Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bartel, Bruno Ferraz
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Saraiva, Clara
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Antropolítica (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/62098
Resumo: The structure of the dossier was modeled based on studies in which religious and secular practices are addressed in an interconnected manner, avoiding their isolated analysis or consideration as neutral descriptive terms. Instead, they were treated as elements intrinsic to the very object of investigation or as analytical tools connected to other relevant categories, such as heritage, modernity, and nation. Our goal was to compile ethnographies that highlighted the new dynamics in which “sacredness and secularity inform, reinforce, and overflow into each other,” especially in the processes of “heritagization of the sacred” and “sacralization of heritage.” We started from the concept of “secular sacred,” which encompasses the intertwined processes of secularization and sacralization. In this context, ideas, feelings, emotions, motivations, experiences, perceptions about people, objects, images, representations, or places intertwine, merge, and sometimes conflict. This approach was inspired by the Talal Asad’s and Saba Mahmood’s insight in the sense that the secular regime does not necessarily oppose religion. The foundation of this perspective lies in understanding religion as a complex social construction process, intertwining history and power. This allows us to identify multiple social agents competing in the construction of their sources of authority, claiming “heritage” through discourses and practices. Therefore, our focus is not on the separation between the categories of religion and secular but on the way they participate in the processes of sacralization and desacralization of heritage endeavors.
id UFF-18_5921d248d82ba4be2c04b5ce57595cb6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/62098
network_acronym_str UFF-18
network_name_str Antropolítica (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contextsApresentação: “Entre a tradição e a inovação”: tensões e negociações entre as categorias religião, secular e patrimônio em contextos lusófonosReligiãoSecularPatrimônio.ReligionSecularHeritage.The structure of the dossier was modeled based on studies in which religious and secular practices are addressed in an interconnected manner, avoiding their isolated analysis or consideration as neutral descriptive terms. Instead, they were treated as elements intrinsic to the very object of investigation or as analytical tools connected to other relevant categories, such as heritage, modernity, and nation. Our goal was to compile ethnographies that highlighted the new dynamics in which “sacredness and secularity inform, reinforce, and overflow into each other,” especially in the processes of “heritagization of the sacred” and “sacralization of heritage.” We started from the concept of “secular sacred,” which encompasses the intertwined processes of secularization and sacralization. In this context, ideas, feelings, emotions, motivations, experiences, perceptions about people, objects, images, representations, or places intertwine, merge, and sometimes conflict. This approach was inspired by the Talal Asad’s and Saba Mahmood’s insight in the sense that the secular regime does not necessarily oppose religion. The foundation of this perspective lies in understanding religion as a complex social construction process, intertwining history and power. This allows us to identify multiple social agents competing in the construction of their sources of authority, claiming “heritage” through discourses and practices. Therefore, our focus is not on the separation between the categories of religion and secular but on the way they participate in the processes of sacralization and desacralization of heritage endeavors.A estrutura do dossiê foi modelada com base em estudos nos quais práticas religiosas e seculares são abordadas de maneira interligada, evitando sua análise isolada ou encará-los como termos descritivos neutros. Em vez disso, foram tratadas como elementos intrínsecos ao próprio objeto de investigação ou como ferramentas analíticas que se conectam a outras categorias relevantes, como patrimônio, modernidade e nação. Nosso objetivo era compilar etnografias que destacassem as novas dinâmicas em que “sacralidade e secularidade se informam, reforçam e transbordam uma para a outra”, especialmente nos processos de “patrimonialização do sagrado” e “sacralização do patrimônio”. Partimos do conceito de “sagrado secular”, que abrange os processos entrelaçados de secularização e sacralização. Nesse contexto, ideias, sentimentos, emoções, motivações, experiências, percepções sobre pessoas, objetos, imagens, representações ou lugares se entrelaçam, se fundem e, por vezes, entram em conflito. Essa abordagem foi inspirada no insight de Talal Asad e Saba Mahmood de que o regime secular não se opõe necessariamente à religião. A base dessa perspectiva reside na compreensão da religião como um processo de construção social complexo, que entrelaça história e poder. Isso permite identificar múltiplos agentes sociais competindo na construção de suas fontes de autoridade, reivindicando a “herança” por meio de discursos e práticas. Portanto nosso enfoque não se volta para a separação entre categorias tais como religião e secular, mas sim para o modo como elas participam dos processos de sacralização e dessacralização dos empreendimentos patrimoniais.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense2024-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/6209810.22409/antropolitica.i.a62098Antropolítica - Revista Contemporânea de Antropologia; v. 56 n. 1 (2024): JAN/FEV/MAR/ABR2179-73311414-737810.22409/antropolitica.reponame:Antropolítica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/62098/36493https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/62098/36494Copyright (c) 2024 Bruno Ferraz Bartel, Clara Saraivahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBartel, Bruno FerrazSaraiva, Clara2024-04-22T18:01:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/62098Revistahttp://www.revistas.uff.br/index.php/antropoliticaPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/oaiperiodicos@proppi.uff.br||antropoliticauff@gmail.com||lauragraziela@gmail.com2179-73312179-7331opendoar:2024-04-22T18:01:34Antropolítica (Online) - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts
Apresentação: “Entre a tradição e a inovação”: tensões e negociações entre as categorias religião, secular e patrimônio em contextos lusófonos
title Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts
spellingShingle Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts
Bartel, Bruno Ferraz
Religião
Secular
Patrimônio.
Religion
Secular
Heritage.
title_short Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts
title_full Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts
title_fullStr Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts
title_full_unstemmed Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts
title_sort Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts
author Bartel, Bruno Ferraz
author_facet Bartel, Bruno Ferraz
Saraiva, Clara
author_role author
author2 Saraiva, Clara
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bartel, Bruno Ferraz
Saraiva, Clara
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Religião
Secular
Patrimônio.
Religion
Secular
Heritage.
topic Religião
Secular
Patrimônio.
Religion
Secular
Heritage.
description The structure of the dossier was modeled based on studies in which religious and secular practices are addressed in an interconnected manner, avoiding their isolated analysis or consideration as neutral descriptive terms. Instead, they were treated as elements intrinsic to the very object of investigation or as analytical tools connected to other relevant categories, such as heritage, modernity, and nation. Our goal was to compile ethnographies that highlighted the new dynamics in which “sacredness and secularity inform, reinforce, and overflow into each other,” especially in the processes of “heritagization of the sacred” and “sacralization of heritage.” We started from the concept of “secular sacred,” which encompasses the intertwined processes of secularization and sacralization. In this context, ideas, feelings, emotions, motivations, experiences, perceptions about people, objects, images, representations, or places intertwine, merge, and sometimes conflict. This approach was inspired by the Talal Asad’s and Saba Mahmood’s insight in the sense that the secular regime does not necessarily oppose religion. The foundation of this perspective lies in understanding religion as a complex social construction process, intertwining history and power. This allows us to identify multiple social agents competing in the construction of their sources of authority, claiming “heritage” through discourses and practices. Therefore, our focus is not on the separation between the categories of religion and secular but on the way they participate in the processes of sacralization and desacralization of heritage endeavors.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/62098
10.22409/antropolitica.i.a62098
url https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/62098
identifier_str_mv 10.22409/antropolitica.i.a62098
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/62098/36493
https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/62098/36494
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Bruno Ferraz Bartel, Clara Saraiva
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Bruno Ferraz Bartel, Clara Saraiva
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Antropolítica - Revista Contemporânea de Antropologia; v. 56 n. 1 (2024): JAN/FEV/MAR/ABR
2179-7331
1414-7378
10.22409/antropolitica.
reponame:Antropolítica (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron:UFF
instname_str Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron_str UFF
institution UFF
reponame_str Antropolítica (Online)
collection Antropolítica (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Antropolítica (Online) - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv periodicos@proppi.uff.br||antropoliticauff@gmail.com||lauragraziela@gmail.com
_version_ 1797068792638996480