Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Antropolítica (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/62098 |
Resumo: | The structure of the dossier was modeled based on studies in which religious and secular practices are addressed in an interconnected manner, avoiding their isolated analysis or consideration as neutral descriptive terms. Instead, they were treated as elements intrinsic to the very object of investigation or as analytical tools connected to other relevant categories, such as heritage, modernity, and nation. Our goal was to compile ethnographies that highlighted the new dynamics in which “sacredness and secularity inform, reinforce, and overflow into each other,” especially in the processes of “heritagization of the sacred” and “sacralization of heritage.” We started from the concept of “secular sacred,” which encompasses the intertwined processes of secularization and sacralization. In this context, ideas, feelings, emotions, motivations, experiences, perceptions about people, objects, images, representations, or places intertwine, merge, and sometimes conflict. This approach was inspired by the Talal Asad’s and Saba Mahmood’s insight in the sense that the secular regime does not necessarily oppose religion. The foundation of this perspective lies in understanding religion as a complex social construction process, intertwining history and power. This allows us to identify multiple social agents competing in the construction of their sources of authority, claiming “heritage” through discourses and practices. Therefore, our focus is not on the separation between the categories of religion and secular but on the way they participate in the processes of sacralization and desacralization of heritage endeavors. |
id |
UFF-18_5921d248d82ba4be2c04b5ce57595cb6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/62098 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-18 |
network_name_str |
Antropolítica (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contextsApresentação: “Entre a tradição e a inovação”: tensões e negociações entre as categorias religião, secular e patrimônio em contextos lusófonosReligiãoSecularPatrimônio.ReligionSecularHeritage.The structure of the dossier was modeled based on studies in which religious and secular practices are addressed in an interconnected manner, avoiding their isolated analysis or consideration as neutral descriptive terms. Instead, they were treated as elements intrinsic to the very object of investigation or as analytical tools connected to other relevant categories, such as heritage, modernity, and nation. Our goal was to compile ethnographies that highlighted the new dynamics in which “sacredness and secularity inform, reinforce, and overflow into each other,” especially in the processes of “heritagization of the sacred” and “sacralization of heritage.” We started from the concept of “secular sacred,” which encompasses the intertwined processes of secularization and sacralization. In this context, ideas, feelings, emotions, motivations, experiences, perceptions about people, objects, images, representations, or places intertwine, merge, and sometimes conflict. This approach was inspired by the Talal Asad’s and Saba Mahmood’s insight in the sense that the secular regime does not necessarily oppose religion. The foundation of this perspective lies in understanding religion as a complex social construction process, intertwining history and power. This allows us to identify multiple social agents competing in the construction of their sources of authority, claiming “heritage” through discourses and practices. Therefore, our focus is not on the separation between the categories of religion and secular but on the way they participate in the processes of sacralization and desacralization of heritage endeavors.A estrutura do dossiê foi modelada com base em estudos nos quais práticas religiosas e seculares são abordadas de maneira interligada, evitando sua análise isolada ou encará-los como termos descritivos neutros. Em vez disso, foram tratadas como elementos intrínsecos ao próprio objeto de investigação ou como ferramentas analíticas que se conectam a outras categorias relevantes, como patrimônio, modernidade e nação. Nosso objetivo era compilar etnografias que destacassem as novas dinâmicas em que “sacralidade e secularidade se informam, reforçam e transbordam uma para a outra”, especialmente nos processos de “patrimonialização do sagrado” e “sacralização do patrimônio”. Partimos do conceito de “sagrado secular”, que abrange os processos entrelaçados de secularização e sacralização. Nesse contexto, ideias, sentimentos, emoções, motivações, experiências, percepções sobre pessoas, objetos, imagens, representações ou lugares se entrelaçam, se fundem e, por vezes, entram em conflito. Essa abordagem foi inspirada no insight de Talal Asad e Saba Mahmood de que o regime secular não se opõe necessariamente à religião. A base dessa perspectiva reside na compreensão da religião como um processo de construção social complexo, que entrelaça história e poder. Isso permite identificar múltiplos agentes sociais competindo na construção de suas fontes de autoridade, reivindicando a “herança” por meio de discursos e práticas. Portanto nosso enfoque não se volta para a separação entre categorias tais como religião e secular, mas sim para o modo como elas participam dos processos de sacralização e dessacralização dos empreendimentos patrimoniais.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense2024-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/6209810.22409/antropolitica.i.a62098Antropolítica - Revista Contemporânea de Antropologia; v. 56 n. 1 (2024): JAN/FEV/MAR/ABR2179-73311414-737810.22409/antropolitica.reponame:Antropolítica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/62098/36493https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/62098/36494Copyright (c) 2024 Bruno Ferraz Bartel, Clara Saraivahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBartel, Bruno FerrazSaraiva, Clara2024-04-22T18:01:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/62098Revistahttp://www.revistas.uff.br/index.php/antropoliticaPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/oaiperiodicos@proppi.uff.br||antropoliticauff@gmail.com||lauragraziela@gmail.com2179-73312179-7331opendoar:2024-04-22T18:01:34Antropolítica (Online) - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts Apresentação: “Entre a tradição e a inovação”: tensões e negociações entre as categorias religião, secular e patrimônio em contextos lusófonos |
title |
Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts |
spellingShingle |
Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts Bartel, Bruno Ferraz Religião Secular Patrimônio. Religion Secular Heritage. |
title_short |
Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts |
title_full |
Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts |
title_fullStr |
Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts |
title_sort |
Presentation: “Between tradition and innovation”: tensions and negotiations between religion, secular, and heritage categories in lusophone contexts |
author |
Bartel, Bruno Ferraz |
author_facet |
Bartel, Bruno Ferraz Saraiva, Clara |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Saraiva, Clara |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bartel, Bruno Ferraz Saraiva, Clara |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Religião Secular Patrimônio. Religion Secular Heritage. |
topic |
Religião Secular Patrimônio. Religion Secular Heritage. |
description |
The structure of the dossier was modeled based on studies in which religious and secular practices are addressed in an interconnected manner, avoiding their isolated analysis or consideration as neutral descriptive terms. Instead, they were treated as elements intrinsic to the very object of investigation or as analytical tools connected to other relevant categories, such as heritage, modernity, and nation. Our goal was to compile ethnographies that highlighted the new dynamics in which “sacredness and secularity inform, reinforce, and overflow into each other,” especially in the processes of “heritagization of the sacred” and “sacralization of heritage.” We started from the concept of “secular sacred,” which encompasses the intertwined processes of secularization and sacralization. In this context, ideas, feelings, emotions, motivations, experiences, perceptions about people, objects, images, representations, or places intertwine, merge, and sometimes conflict. This approach was inspired by the Talal Asad’s and Saba Mahmood’s insight in the sense that the secular regime does not necessarily oppose religion. The foundation of this perspective lies in understanding religion as a complex social construction process, intertwining history and power. This allows us to identify multiple social agents competing in the construction of their sources of authority, claiming “heritage” through discourses and practices. Therefore, our focus is not on the separation between the categories of religion and secular but on the way they participate in the processes of sacralization and desacralization of heritage endeavors. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/62098 10.22409/antropolitica.i.a62098 |
url |
https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/62098 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22409/antropolitica.i.a62098 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/62098/36493 https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/62098/36494 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Bruno Ferraz Bartel, Clara Saraiva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Bruno Ferraz Bartel, Clara Saraiva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Antropolítica - Revista Contemporânea de Antropologia; v. 56 n. 1 (2024): JAN/FEV/MAR/ABR 2179-7331 1414-7378 10.22409/antropolitica. reponame:Antropolítica (Online) instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Antropolítica (Online) |
collection |
Antropolítica (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Antropolítica (Online) - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
periodicos@proppi.uff.br||antropoliticauff@gmail.com||lauragraziela@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797068792638996480 |