Endoscopic processing: what are the gaps in clinical practice?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Madureira, Rosilaine Aparecida da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Adriana Cristina de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66550
Resumo: Objective: This paper aimed to identify gaps in clinical practice that interfere with the effectiveness of endoscopic processing. Method: Integrative review of articles published between 2008 and 2020, identified in databases through controlled descriptors in Health Sciences, adopting the PICO strategy. The identified gaps were classified according to the level of evidence (IA, IB, IC, II). Results: Eighteen articles were found, recording 64 gaps, 26.6% at the level of evidence IA and 40.6% IB, predominating: absence/inadequate drying (55.5%), manual cleaning without brushing the inappropriate channels/brushes (50%), omission of the sealing test (38.8%), inadequate storage (33.3%) and use of the disinfectant solution (27.7%), time of immersion or monitoring of the minimum effective concentration, absence of pre-cleaning (16.6%), incorrect transportation to the processing room (11.1%). Conclusion: It was concluded that guidelines strongly recommended by international and national entities have been breached, representing critical aspects in the processing of endoscopes that imply potential failures in patient safety.
id UFG-13_2b5505651fc68acf6cd6b9311e2bbd0c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/66550
network_acronym_str UFG-13
network_name_str Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
repository_id_str
spelling Endoscopic processing: what are the gaps in clinical practice?Processamento endoscópico: quais são os gaps na prática clínica?Endoscopes, GastrointestinalDisinfectionSterilizationInfection ControlEndoscópios GastrointestinaisDesinfecçãoEsterilizaçãoControle de Infecções Objective: This paper aimed to identify gaps in clinical practice that interfere with the effectiveness of endoscopic processing. Method: Integrative review of articles published between 2008 and 2020, identified in databases through controlled descriptors in Health Sciences, adopting the PICO strategy. The identified gaps were classified according to the level of evidence (IA, IB, IC, II). Results: Eighteen articles were found, recording 64 gaps, 26.6% at the level of evidence IA and 40.6% IB, predominating: absence/inadequate drying (55.5%), manual cleaning without brushing the inappropriate channels/brushes (50%), omission of the sealing test (38.8%), inadequate storage (33.3%) and use of the disinfectant solution (27.7%), time of immersion or monitoring of the minimum effective concentration, absence of pre-cleaning (16.6%), incorrect transportation to the processing room (11.1%). Conclusion: It was concluded that guidelines strongly recommended by international and national entities have been breached, representing critical aspects in the processing of endoscopes that imply potential failures in patient safety. Objetivo: Identificar na prática clínica gaps que interferem na efetividade do processamento endoscópico. Método: Revisão integrativa de artigos publicados entre 2008–2020, identificados em bases de dados por meio de descritores controlados em Ciências da Saúde, adotando-se a estratégia PICO. Os gaps identificados foram classificados segundo nível de evidência (IA, IB, IC, II). Resultados: Foram encontrados 18 artigos registrando 64 gaps, 26,6% no nível de evidência IA e 40,6% IB, predominando: ausência/inadequação da secagem (55,5%), limpeza manual sem escovação dos canais/escovas inapropriadas (50%), omissão do teste de vedação (38,8%), inadequações no armazenamento (33,3%) e no uso da solução desinfetante (27,7%), tempo de imersão ou monitorização da concentração mínima eficaz, ausência de pré-limpeza (16,6%), transporte incorreto para a sala de processamento (11,1%). Conclusão: As diretrizes fortemente recomendadas por entidades internacionais e nacional têm sido descumpridas, representando aspectos críticos no processamento dos endoscópios que implicam em potenciais falhas na segurança do paciente. Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG2021-06-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/6655010.5216/ree.v23.66550Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; Vol. 23 (2021); 66550Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; v. 23 (2021); 665501518-1944reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Enfermageminstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporenghttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66550/36746https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66550/36747Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagemhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMadureira, Rosilaine Aparecida da SilvaOliveira, Adriana Cristina de2023-07-31T14:44:03Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/66550Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/fenPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/fen/oairee.fen@ufg.br1518-19441518-1944opendoar:2023-07-31T14:44:03Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Endoscopic processing: what are the gaps in clinical practice?
Processamento endoscópico: quais são os gaps na prática clínica?
title Endoscopic processing: what are the gaps in clinical practice?
spellingShingle Endoscopic processing: what are the gaps in clinical practice?
Madureira, Rosilaine Aparecida da Silva
Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal
Disinfection
Sterilization
Infection Control
Endoscópios Gastrointestinais
Desinfecção
Esterilização
Controle de Infecções
title_short Endoscopic processing: what are the gaps in clinical practice?
title_full Endoscopic processing: what are the gaps in clinical practice?
title_fullStr Endoscopic processing: what are the gaps in clinical practice?
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic processing: what are the gaps in clinical practice?
title_sort Endoscopic processing: what are the gaps in clinical practice?
author Madureira, Rosilaine Aparecida da Silva
author_facet Madureira, Rosilaine Aparecida da Silva
Oliveira, Adriana Cristina de
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Adriana Cristina de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Madureira, Rosilaine Aparecida da Silva
Oliveira, Adriana Cristina de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal
Disinfection
Sterilization
Infection Control
Endoscópios Gastrointestinais
Desinfecção
Esterilização
Controle de Infecções
topic Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal
Disinfection
Sterilization
Infection Control
Endoscópios Gastrointestinais
Desinfecção
Esterilização
Controle de Infecções
description Objective: This paper aimed to identify gaps in clinical practice that interfere with the effectiveness of endoscopic processing. Method: Integrative review of articles published between 2008 and 2020, identified in databases through controlled descriptors in Health Sciences, adopting the PICO strategy. The identified gaps were classified according to the level of evidence (IA, IB, IC, II). Results: Eighteen articles were found, recording 64 gaps, 26.6% at the level of evidence IA and 40.6% IB, predominating: absence/inadequate drying (55.5%), manual cleaning without brushing the inappropriate channels/brushes (50%), omission of the sealing test (38.8%), inadequate storage (33.3%) and use of the disinfectant solution (27.7%), time of immersion or monitoring of the minimum effective concentration, absence of pre-cleaning (16.6%), incorrect transportation to the processing room (11.1%). Conclusion: It was concluded that guidelines strongly recommended by international and national entities have been breached, representing critical aspects in the processing of endoscopes that imply potential failures in patient safety.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66550
10.5216/ree.v23.66550
url https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66550
identifier_str_mv 10.5216/ree.v23.66550
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66550/36746
https://revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/66550/36747
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Enfermagem da UFG
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; Vol. 23 (2021); 66550
Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem; v. 23 (2021); 66550
1518-1944
reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
collection Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ree.fen@ufg.br
_version_ 1797049164251529216