EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY: EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sampaio, José Adércio Leite
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/68800
Resumo: The judicial review requires, expressly or implicitly, that the legislative process must be based on empirical elements or on evidence that support the prognoses made in them. This requirement tends to be gauged generally through formal conformity judgments, but, as the case law of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany reveals, it is sometimes assessed by forays into factual elements that integrated the deliberative process in the parliamentary sphere. The sub-theorizing of the matter and the democratic criticism of recognizing a judicial jurisdiction of such magnitude have provided judicial intervention without much coherence or predictability. In this article, answers are sought in the jurisprudence of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. Bibliographic and documentary research were used in the methodology.
id UFG-14_b52d4684be36d37e2e929527b76cca17
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/68800
network_acronym_str UFG-14
network_name_str Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY: EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANYO CONTROLE DE PROGNOSE LEGISLATIVA NA JURISPRUDÊNCIA DO TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL FEDERAL DA ALEMANHA: EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANYControle de constitucionalidadeDevido processo legislativoPrognose LegislativaTribunal Constitucional Federal da AlemanhaThe judicial review requires, expressly or implicitly, that the legislative process must be based on empirical elements or on evidence that support the prognoses made in them. This requirement tends to be gauged generally through formal conformity judgments, but, as the case law of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany reveals, it is sometimes assessed by forays into factual elements that integrated the deliberative process in the parliamentary sphere. The sub-theorizing of the matter and the democratic criticism of recognizing a judicial jurisdiction of such magnitude have provided judicial intervention without much coherence or predictability. In this article, answers are sought in the jurisprudence of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. Bibliographic and documentary research were used in the methodology.A constitucionalidade das leis, realizada pelos órgãos da jurisdição constitucional, requer, de maneira expressa ou implícita, que o processo legislativo se tenha baseado em elementos empíricos ou em evidências que sustentem as prognoses nelas positivadas. Esse requerimento tende a ser aferido geralmente por meio de juízos formais de conformidade, mas, como revela a jurisprudência do Tribunal Constitucional Federal da Alemanha, é, às vezes, avaliado por incursões em elementos factuais que integraram o processo deliberativo no âmbito parlamentar. A subteorização da matéria e a crítica democrática de reconhecimento de uma competência judicial de tamanha magnitude têm propiciado intervenções judiciais sem muita coerência ou previsibilidade. No presente artigo, procuram-se respostas na jurisprudência do Tribunal Constitucional Federal da Alemanha. Na metodologia utilizou-se a pesquisa bibliográfica e documental.Universidade Federal de Goiás2023-08-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliação por "double-blind review"application/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/68800Revista Facultad de Derecho UFG; Vol. 47 Núm. 1 (2023): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFGMagazine de la faculté de droit UFG; Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFGRevista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG; v. 47 n. 1 (2023): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFG0101-7187reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/68800/40123Copyright (c) 2023 Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFGinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSampaio, José Adércio Leite2023-08-22T22:12:21Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/68800Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/revfdPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/oaimcvidotte@gmail.com || rfdufg@gmail.com2317-67330101-7187opendoar:2023-08-22T22:12:21Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY: EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY
O CONTROLE DE PROGNOSE LEGISLATIVA NA JURISPRUDÊNCIA DO TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL FEDERAL DA ALEMANHA: EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY
title EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY: EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY
spellingShingle EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY: EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY
Sampaio, José Adércio Leite
Controle de constitucionalidade
Devido processo legislativo
Prognose Legislativa
Tribunal Constitucional Federal da Alemanha
title_short EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY: EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY
title_full EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY: EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY
title_fullStr EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY: EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY
title_full_unstemmed EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY: EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY
title_sort EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY: EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY
author Sampaio, José Adércio Leite
author_facet Sampaio, José Adércio Leite
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sampaio, José Adércio Leite
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Controle de constitucionalidade
Devido processo legislativo
Prognose Legislativa
Tribunal Constitucional Federal da Alemanha
topic Controle de constitucionalidade
Devido processo legislativo
Prognose Legislativa
Tribunal Constitucional Federal da Alemanha
description The judicial review requires, expressly or implicitly, that the legislative process must be based on empirical elements or on evidence that support the prognoses made in them. This requirement tends to be gauged generally through formal conformity judgments, but, as the case law of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany reveals, it is sometimes assessed by forays into factual elements that integrated the deliberative process in the parliamentary sphere. The sub-theorizing of the matter and the democratic criticism of recognizing a judicial jurisdiction of such magnitude have provided judicial intervention without much coherence or predictability. In this article, answers are sought in the jurisprudence of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. Bibliographic and documentary research were used in the methodology.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliação por "double-blind review"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/68800
url https://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/68800
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/68800/40123
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Facultad de Derecho UFG; Vol. 47 Núm. 1 (2023): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFG
Magazine de la faculté de droit UFG; Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFG
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG; v. 47 n. 1 (2023): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFG
0101-7187
reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online)
collection Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mcvidotte@gmail.com || rfdufg@gmail.com
_version_ 1796798165771354112

Registros relacionados