A importância das abelhas para a cultura do tomateiro

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva Neto, Carlos de Melo e
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
dARK ID: ark:/38995/0013000004dn2
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/6708
Resumo: Improper use of pesticides is negative visiting bees of agricultural crops, reducing the gains in production resulting from pollination. There are no studies on the effect of fungicides on the bees that pollinate crops, and not only insecticides can cause negative effects bees. The tomato production, is that culture is widely carried out in greenhouses, a condition that reduces the use of pesticides, but generates the pollination deficit, reducing the production of fruit. Thus, the objectives of this study are to verify the pesticides used in tomato crop and the list of products with bees the influence of fungicides in the pollination of culture and bee management in protected environment. In this study there were three activities, first a case study with a survey of pesticides used in tomato plantation in Goianápolis, followed by experiment conducted in a greenhouse to check the pollination of tomato by stingless bee Melipona quadrifasciata and last group experiments to verify effect repellency pollinators of tomato by different combinations of fungicides in the field and their respective fruit production, followed by the death of M. quadrifasciata bees in the laboratory with the use of fungicides. The use of 35 pesticides was found, and 40.5% only of the insecticide class, 32.4% are fungicides, 13.5% are miticides and insecticides and only two products used belong to class of fungicides and bactericides and herbicides. Regarding the toxicological classification of the products, 51.4% are classified as moderately toxic, however 17.14% are classified as extremely toxic and highly toxic, amounting to 34.38% for both groups and only 14.2% are classified as low toxicity. Thus, about 97% of the products used have some degree of danger in relation to the environment. 22 (62.85%) of the chemicals used in growing tomato show the dose lethal to A. mellifera, mostly represented by insecticides. As for pollination in the greenhouse, the fruits of tomatoes produced in greenhouses with the presence of bees showed a superiority of 15% in fresh weight and 41.1% in the number of seeds in relation to the fruits produced in an open environment. For tomato indeterminate growth, seed yield is 33% greater when the flower is pollinated and mass production of tomatoes reaches a 16% gain. The results show the relevance of the use of M. quadrifasciata directed pollination in the greenhouse. The mortality rate for M. quadrifasciata in 24 hours valuation was higher for copper hydroxide and Trifloxistrobin and Tebuconazole, being approximately 75% and 50%, respectively. Already Mancozeb, Bacillus subtilis and the witness did not differ among themselves. Thus, the more pesticide applications made on tomato flowers, fewer visits from bees flowers and consequentenente lower the amount of pollen grains deposited on stigmas, reflecting in fruit production.
id UFG-2_217bad79b21e04ef13f604813c66ad01
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/6708
network_acronym_str UFG-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFG
repository_id_str
spelling Nascimento, Abadia dos Reishttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6270103344297514Franceschinelli, Edivani Villaronhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8863732932277904Nascimento, Abadia dos ReisSant’Ana, Georgia Ribeiro Silveira deCalil, Francine NevesBorges, Jacomo DivinoBraga, Carla Afonso da Silva Bitencourthttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2681735180356106Silva Neto, Carlos de Melo e2017-01-11T09:50:40Z2016-12-09Silva-Neto, C. M. A importância das abelhas para a cultura do tomateiro. 2016. 115 f. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2016.http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/6708ark:/38995/0013000004dn2Improper use of pesticides is negative visiting bees of agricultural crops, reducing the gains in production resulting from pollination. There are no studies on the effect of fungicides on the bees that pollinate crops, and not only insecticides can cause negative effects bees. The tomato production, is that culture is widely carried out in greenhouses, a condition that reduces the use of pesticides, but generates the pollination deficit, reducing the production of fruit. Thus, the objectives of this study are to verify the pesticides used in tomato crop and the list of products with bees the influence of fungicides in the pollination of culture and bee management in protected environment. In this study there were three activities, first a case study with a survey of pesticides used in tomato plantation in Goianápolis, followed by experiment conducted in a greenhouse to check the pollination of tomato by stingless bee Melipona quadrifasciata and last group experiments to verify effect repellency pollinators of tomato by different combinations of fungicides in the field and their respective fruit production, followed by the death of M. quadrifasciata bees in the laboratory with the use of fungicides. The use of 35 pesticides was found, and 40.5% only of the insecticide class, 32.4% are fungicides, 13.5% are miticides and insecticides and only two products used belong to class of fungicides and bactericides and herbicides. Regarding the toxicological classification of the products, 51.4% are classified as moderately toxic, however 17.14% are classified as extremely toxic and highly toxic, amounting to 34.38% for both groups and only 14.2% are classified as low toxicity. Thus, about 97% of the products used have some degree of danger in relation to the environment. 22 (62.85%) of the chemicals used in growing tomato show the dose lethal to A. mellifera, mostly represented by insecticides. As for pollination in the greenhouse, the fruits of tomatoes produced in greenhouses with the presence of bees showed a superiority of 15% in fresh weight and 41.1% in the number of seeds in relation to the fruits produced in an open environment. For tomato indeterminate growth, seed yield is 33% greater when the flower is pollinated and mass production of tomatoes reaches a 16% gain. The results show the relevance of the use of M. quadrifasciata directed pollination in the greenhouse. The mortality rate for M. quadrifasciata in 24 hours valuation was higher for copper hydroxide and Trifloxistrobin and Tebuconazole, being approximately 75% and 50%, respectively. Already Mancozeb, Bacillus subtilis and the witness did not differ among themselves. Thus, the more pesticide applications made on tomato flowers, fewer visits from bees flowers and consequentenente lower the amount of pollen grains deposited on stigmas, reflecting in fruit production.O uso inadequado dos agrotóxicos é negativo às abelhas visitantes das culturas agrícolas, reduzindo os ganhos em produção resultantes da polinização. Ainda não existem estudos acerca do efeito dos fungicidas sobre as abelhas que polinizam culturas agrícolas, sendo que não somente inseticidas podem causar efeitos negativos às abelhas. A produção do tomateiro também é realizada em casas de vegetação, condição que poderia reduzir o uso de agrotóxicos, porém gera o deficit de polinização, reduzindo a produção de frutos. Assim, os objetivos desta pesquisa são verificar os agrotóxicos utilizados na cultura do tomateiro e a relação desses produtos com as abelhas, a influência de fungicidas na polinização da cultura e o manejo de abelha em ambiente protegido. Neste estudo foram realizadas três atividades, primeiro, um estudo de caso com o levantamento de agrotóxicos utilizado no cultivo do tomateiro em Goianápolis, GO, seguido de experimento conduzido em casa de vegetação para verificar a polinização do tomateiro pela abelha sem ferrão Melipona quadrifasciata e, por último, foram conduzidos dois experimentos para verificar o efeito de repelência de visitantes florais de tomateiro por diferentes combinações de fungicidas em campo e sua respectiva produção de frutos, seguido da mortalidade de abelhas M. quadrifasciata em laboratório com uso dos fungicidas. Foi verificada a utilização de 35 agrotóxicos, sendo 40,5% deles exclusivamente da classe dos inseticidas, 32,4% fungicidas, 13,5% acaricidas e inseticidas e apenas dois produtos utilizados pertenciam à classe dos fungicidas e bactericidas, e um herbicida. Em relação à classificação toxicológica dos produtos, 51,4% classificados como medianamente tóxicos, porém 17,14% classificados como extremamente tóxicos e altamente tóxicos, totalizando 34,38% para os dois grupos, e somente 14,2% classificados como pouco tóxicos. Assim, cerca de 97% dos produtos utilizados apresentam algum grau de periculosidade em relação ao meio ambiente. Do total, 22 (62,85%) dos produtos químicos utilizados no cultivo de tomateiro apresentam a dose letal para A. mellifera, sendo a maioria representada por inseticidas. Quanto à polinização em casa de vegetação, os frutos de tomate produzidos em estufas com presença de abelhas apresentaram uma superioridade de 15% em massa fresca e 41,1% no número de sementes em relação aos frutos produzidos em ambiente aberto. Para o tomateiro de crescimento indeterminado, a produção de semente é 33% maior quando a flor é polinizada e a produção de massa de tomate apresenta ganhos de 16%. Os resultados evidenciam a relevância do uso de M. quadrifasciata direcionado à polinização de plantas do tomateiro em casa de vegetação. A taxa de mortalidade para M. quadrifasciata em 24 horas de avaliação foi maior quando aplicados o Hidróxido de cobre (75%) e a Trifloxistrobina + Tebuconazol (50%). No entanto, nos tratamentos com Mancozeb, Bacillus subtilis e no tratamento testemunha não houve diferenças entre si. Assim, quanto mais aplicações de agrotóxicos realizadas sobre as flores de tomateiros, ocorre menos visitas de abelhas às flores e, consequentenente, menor a quantidade de grãos de pólen depositados nos estigmas, refletindo na produção de frutos.Submitted by Erika Demachki (erikademachki@gmail.com) on 2017-01-10T16:36:36Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - Carlos de Melo e Silva Neto - 2016.pdf: 1946853 bytes, checksum: efe032887d4f598ce1710e9dff1b46d1 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2017-01-11T09:50:40Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - Carlos de Melo e Silva Neto - 2016.pdf: 1946853 bytes, checksum: efe032887d4f598ce1710e9dff1b46d1 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-01-11T09:50:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - Carlos de Melo e Silva Neto - 2016.pdf: 1946853 bytes, checksum: efe032887d4f598ce1710e9dff1b46d1 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-12-09Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de GoiásPrograma de Pós-graduação em Agronomia (EAEA)UFGBrasilEscola de Agronomia e Engenharia de Alimentos - EAEA (RG)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAgrotóxicoFungicidasMelipona quadrifasciataMortalidadePolinizaçãoInseticidasPesticidesFungicidesMortalityPollinationInsecticidesCIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIAA importância das abelhas para a cultura do tomateiroThe importance of bees for the tomato cropinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis8421195611339883816006006006004500684695727928426-30911387149076039072075167498588264571reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFGinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/62ac43da-7014-4a3f-910f-205d777a94cd/downloadbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/6df70478-a43a-46df-8fb9-0ae0a5b50df8/download4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-80http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/abec471e-16f6-4455-bf33-722d282c8933/downloadd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD53license_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-80http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/cdcf52db-182a-4ee6-a936-702b27be4597/downloadd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54ORIGINALTese - Carlos de Melo e Silva Neto - 2016.pdfTese - Carlos de Melo e Silva Neto - 2016.pdfapplication/pdf1946853http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/849408fc-9017-43b6-bcbe-5e402f51d4c2/downloadefe032887d4f598ce1710e9dff1b46d1MD55tede/67082017-01-11 07:50:40.327http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acesso Abertoopen.accessoai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/6708http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tedeRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/oai/requesttasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.bropendoar:2017-01-11T09:50:40Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)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
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv A importância das abelhas para a cultura do tomateiro
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv The importance of bees for the tomato crop
title A importância das abelhas para a cultura do tomateiro
spellingShingle A importância das abelhas para a cultura do tomateiro
Silva Neto, Carlos de Melo e
Agrotóxico
Fungicidas
Melipona quadrifasciata
Mortalidade
Polinização
Inseticidas
Pesticides
Fungicides
Mortality
Pollination
Insecticides
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
title_short A importância das abelhas para a cultura do tomateiro
title_full A importância das abelhas para a cultura do tomateiro
title_fullStr A importância das abelhas para a cultura do tomateiro
title_full_unstemmed A importância das abelhas para a cultura do tomateiro
title_sort A importância das abelhas para a cultura do tomateiro
author Silva Neto, Carlos de Melo e
author_facet Silva Neto, Carlos de Melo e
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Nascimento, Abadia dos Reis
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6270103344297514
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv Franceschinelli, Edivani Villaron
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8863732932277904
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Nascimento, Abadia dos Reis
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Sant’Ana, Georgia Ribeiro Silveira de
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Calil, Francine Neves
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv Borges, Jacomo Divino
dc.contributor.referee5.fl_str_mv Braga, Carla Afonso da Silva Bitencourt
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2681735180356106
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva Neto, Carlos de Melo e
contributor_str_mv Nascimento, Abadia dos Reis
Franceschinelli, Edivani Villaron
Nascimento, Abadia dos Reis
Sant’Ana, Georgia Ribeiro Silveira de
Calil, Francine Neves
Borges, Jacomo Divino
Braga, Carla Afonso da Silva Bitencourt
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agrotóxico
Fungicidas
Melipona quadrifasciata
Mortalidade
Polinização
Inseticidas
topic Agrotóxico
Fungicidas
Melipona quadrifasciata
Mortalidade
Polinização
Inseticidas
Pesticides
Fungicides
Mortality
Pollination
Insecticides
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Pesticides
Fungicides
Mortality
Pollination
Insecticides
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
description Improper use of pesticides is negative visiting bees of agricultural crops, reducing the gains in production resulting from pollination. There are no studies on the effect of fungicides on the bees that pollinate crops, and not only insecticides can cause negative effects bees. The tomato production, is that culture is widely carried out in greenhouses, a condition that reduces the use of pesticides, but generates the pollination deficit, reducing the production of fruit. Thus, the objectives of this study are to verify the pesticides used in tomato crop and the list of products with bees the influence of fungicides in the pollination of culture and bee management in protected environment. In this study there were three activities, first a case study with a survey of pesticides used in tomato plantation in Goianápolis, followed by experiment conducted in a greenhouse to check the pollination of tomato by stingless bee Melipona quadrifasciata and last group experiments to verify effect repellency pollinators of tomato by different combinations of fungicides in the field and their respective fruit production, followed by the death of M. quadrifasciata bees in the laboratory with the use of fungicides. The use of 35 pesticides was found, and 40.5% only of the insecticide class, 32.4% are fungicides, 13.5% are miticides and insecticides and only two products used belong to class of fungicides and bactericides and herbicides. Regarding the toxicological classification of the products, 51.4% are classified as moderately toxic, however 17.14% are classified as extremely toxic and highly toxic, amounting to 34.38% for both groups and only 14.2% are classified as low toxicity. Thus, about 97% of the products used have some degree of danger in relation to the environment. 22 (62.85%) of the chemicals used in growing tomato show the dose lethal to A. mellifera, mostly represented by insecticides. As for pollination in the greenhouse, the fruits of tomatoes produced in greenhouses with the presence of bees showed a superiority of 15% in fresh weight and 41.1% in the number of seeds in relation to the fruits produced in an open environment. For tomato indeterminate growth, seed yield is 33% greater when the flower is pollinated and mass production of tomatoes reaches a 16% gain. The results show the relevance of the use of M. quadrifasciata directed pollination in the greenhouse. The mortality rate for M. quadrifasciata in 24 hours valuation was higher for copper hydroxide and Trifloxistrobin and Tebuconazole, being approximately 75% and 50%, respectively. Already Mancozeb, Bacillus subtilis and the witness did not differ among themselves. Thus, the more pesticide applications made on tomato flowers, fewer visits from bees flowers and consequentenente lower the amount of pollen grains deposited on stigmas, reflecting in fruit production.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2016-12-09
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-01-11T09:50:40Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Silva-Neto, C. M. A importância das abelhas para a cultura do tomateiro. 2016. 115 f. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2016.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/6708
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/38995/0013000004dn2
identifier_str_mv Silva-Neto, C. M. A importância das abelhas para a cultura do tomateiro. 2016. 115 f. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2016.
ark:/38995/0013000004dn2
url http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/6708
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv 842119561133988381
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv 4500684695727928426
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -3091138714907603907
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv 2075167498588264571
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-graduação em Agronomia (EAEA)
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFG
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Escola de Agronomia e Engenharia de Alimentos - EAEA (RG)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFG
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/62ac43da-7014-4a3f-910f-205d777a94cd/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/6df70478-a43a-46df-8fb9-0ae0a5b50df8/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/abec471e-16f6-4455-bf33-722d282c8933/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/cdcf52db-182a-4ee6-a936-702b27be4597/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/849408fc-9017-43b6-bcbe-5e402f51d4c2/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
efe032887d4f598ce1710e9dff1b46d1
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.br
_version_ 1815172556529860608