O sistema interamericano de proteção dos direitos humanos a partir do constitucionalismo multinível, do transconstitucionalismo e da interconstitucionalidade: desafios e limites

• Autor(a) principal: Cordeiro, Lais Vaz
• Data de Publicação: 2015
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
• dARK ID: ark:/38995/001300000dbr5
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5442
• topic: Direitos humanos; Sistema Interamericano de Proteção de Direitos Humanos; Constitucionalismo multinível; Transconstitucionalismo; Interconstitucionalidade; Human rights; Inter-American System of Human Rights Protection; Multilevel constitutionalism; Transconstitucionalism; Interconstitucionality; CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO

Since the promulgation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by members of the United Nations (UN) in 1948, major historical changes occurred in the international arena. The intensification of the complexity of global society led to the need for development of new legal models for new cross-border problems. It seeks, in this work, display and critically analyze the multilevel constitutionalism, transconstitucionalism and interconstitucionality and approach these perspectives in relation to the Inter-American System of Human Rights Protection (ISHR) in order to try to understand the phenomena of constitutional integration and exchanges in Latin American countries. From this objective, it seeks to present the current Project of ISHR and in particular the Inter-American Court (IACHR).It is understood that jurisprudence built by the IACHR, as well as the "conventionality control”, represent new factors in the legal systems that undergo a process of integration and therefore are relevant to understanding the contemporary dynamic. It presents a brief statement about the ISHR's performance in the Brazilian context and its consequences, as the critical position of Brazil in relation to certain requests and determinations issued by the Commission and Inter-American Court, respectively. Through the exposure of the Inter-American Court jurisprudence in cases of amnesty laws, we intend to identify, in the current Latin American scene, the placement of this Court, I try to view the prospects discussed and delineate potential consequences of each of the three constitutional integration models analyzed with regard the hypothesis of functioning as theoretical references at the Latin American experience of human rights promotion. It is recognized that neither model completely correspond to legal or political dynamics of the ISHR, however, it is expected to identify the approach and the distance of this system about these new emerging constitutional models of Constitutional Law, considering the conceptual delimitation of Human Rights used for the construction of this analysis, that is, they are constituted as an open content class, which is incompatible therefore with a universal-abstract and unifying bias.