MILLET SILAGE COMPARED TO TRADITIONAL GRASSES: QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Jacovetti, Reginaldo
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Fernandes de Souza França, Aldi, Aparecida Carnevalli, Roberta, Sayuri Miyagi, Eliane, Costa Brunes, Ludmilla, Staciarini Corrêa, Daniel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/e-26539
Resumo: In this assay, we evaluated morphological composition, agronomic parameters, dry matter yield, and the silage fermentative process from pearl millet, sorghum, and corn plant with or without ears within different silos opening times (3, 7, 15, 30, 60, and 120 days). Effluent and gas release from silages were also evaluated besides its chemical composition and protein fractioning. Production costs of all silages were estimated. We also estimate milk production according to different silages dry matter production. Evaluated cultivars were, ADR-7010 (pearl millet), BRS-610 (sorghum), AG-5055 (corn), and IAC-86-2480 (sugarcane). Significant differences were observed for both production as well as chemical composition and production costs. Pearl millet did not prove to be competitive when compared with other forages. However, as winter crop, pearl millet could be profitable due to the low water exigencies when compared to the other crops.Keywords: chemical composition; CNCPS; dry matter yield; grasses; production costs. 
id UFG-7_0be2851fdfded243b7c2acd06807fe97
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/26539
network_acronym_str UFG-7
network_name_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling MILLET SILAGE COMPARED TO TRADITIONAL GRASSES: QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICSMilheto como silagem comparado a gramíneas tradicionais: aspectos quantitativos, qualitativos e econômicosForrage productionComposição bromatológicaCustos de produçãoCNCPSGramíneasProdução de massa secaIn this assay, we evaluated morphological composition, agronomic parameters, dry matter yield, and the silage fermentative process from pearl millet, sorghum, and corn plant with or without ears within different silos opening times (3, 7, 15, 30, 60, and 120 days). Effluent and gas release from silages were also evaluated besides its chemical composition and protein fractioning. Production costs of all silages were estimated. We also estimate milk production according to different silages dry matter production. Evaluated cultivars were, ADR-7010 (pearl millet), BRS-610 (sorghum), AG-5055 (corn), and IAC-86-2480 (sugarcane). Significant differences were observed for both production as well as chemical composition and production costs. Pearl millet did not prove to be competitive when compared with other forages. However, as winter crop, pearl millet could be profitable due to the low water exigencies when compared to the other crops.Keywords: chemical composition; CNCPS; dry matter yield; grasses; production costs. Foram avaliados a composição morfológica, os parâmetros agronômicos, a produção de massa seca das plantas forrageiras utilizadas para o processo de ensilagem, bem como a caracterização do processo fermentativo, em diferentes tempos de abertura dos mini-silos (3, 7, 15, 30, 60, 120 dias) após a ensilagem. Procedeu-se também às determinações das perdas de efluentes e gases, além da composição bromatológica e fracionamento de proteína das silagens. Também foi estimado o custo de produção e a produção de leite em função da matéria seca das silagens produzidas a partir de diferentes gramíneas. As espécies forrageiras avaliadas foram: milheto ADR-7010, sorgo BRS 610, milho AG 5055 com espiga, milho AG 5055 sem espiga e cana-de-açúcar IAC 86-2480. Foram observadas diferenças significativas tanto para produção, quanto composição bromatológica e custos de produção. O milheto não se mostrou competitivo com as demais forrageiras; entretanto, constitui opção como cultura de inverno em decorrência de sua baixa exigência hídrica quando comparado às demais culturas.Universidade Federal de Goiás2018-10-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa CientíficaResearchapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/e-2653910.1590/cab19026539Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 19 (2018): Continuous publication; 1-16Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 19 (2018): Publicação contínua; 1-161809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/e-26539/26391https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/e-26539/26392Jacovetti, ReginaldoFernandes de Souza França, AldiAparecida Carnevalli, RobertaSayuri Miyagi, ElianeCosta Brunes, LudmillaStaciarini Corrêa, Danielinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-23T18:50:39Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/26539Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2024-05-21T19:56:02.215363Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv MILLET SILAGE COMPARED TO TRADITIONAL GRASSES: QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
Milheto como silagem comparado a gramíneas tradicionais: aspectos quantitativos, qualitativos e econômicos
title MILLET SILAGE COMPARED TO TRADITIONAL GRASSES: QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
spellingShingle MILLET SILAGE COMPARED TO TRADITIONAL GRASSES: QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
Jacovetti, Reginaldo
Forrage production
Composição bromatológica
Custos de produção
CNCPS
Gramíneas
Produção de massa seca
title_short MILLET SILAGE COMPARED TO TRADITIONAL GRASSES: QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
title_full MILLET SILAGE COMPARED TO TRADITIONAL GRASSES: QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
title_fullStr MILLET SILAGE COMPARED TO TRADITIONAL GRASSES: QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
title_full_unstemmed MILLET SILAGE COMPARED TO TRADITIONAL GRASSES: QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
title_sort MILLET SILAGE COMPARED TO TRADITIONAL GRASSES: QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
author Jacovetti, Reginaldo
author_facet Jacovetti, Reginaldo
Fernandes de Souza França, Aldi
Aparecida Carnevalli, Roberta
Sayuri Miyagi, Eliane
Costa Brunes, Ludmilla
Staciarini Corrêa, Daniel
author_role author
author2 Fernandes de Souza França, Aldi
Aparecida Carnevalli, Roberta
Sayuri Miyagi, Eliane
Costa Brunes, Ludmilla
Staciarini Corrêa, Daniel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jacovetti, Reginaldo
Fernandes de Souza França, Aldi
Aparecida Carnevalli, Roberta
Sayuri Miyagi, Eliane
Costa Brunes, Ludmilla
Staciarini Corrêa, Daniel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Forrage production
Composição bromatológica
Custos de produção
CNCPS
Gramíneas
Produção de massa seca
topic Forrage production
Composição bromatológica
Custos de produção
CNCPS
Gramíneas
Produção de massa seca
description In this assay, we evaluated morphological composition, agronomic parameters, dry matter yield, and the silage fermentative process from pearl millet, sorghum, and corn plant with or without ears within different silos opening times (3, 7, 15, 30, 60, and 120 days). Effluent and gas release from silages were also evaluated besides its chemical composition and protein fractioning. Production costs of all silages were estimated. We also estimate milk production according to different silages dry matter production. Evaluated cultivars were, ADR-7010 (pearl millet), BRS-610 (sorghum), AG-5055 (corn), and IAC-86-2480 (sugarcane). Significant differences were observed for both production as well as chemical composition and production costs. Pearl millet did not prove to be competitive when compared with other forages. However, as winter crop, pearl millet could be profitable due to the low water exigencies when compared to the other crops.Keywords: chemical composition; CNCPS; dry matter yield; grasses; production costs. 
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa Científica
Research
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/e-26539
10.1590/cab19026539
url https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/e-26539
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/cab19026539
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/e-26539/26391
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/e-26539/26392
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 19 (2018): Continuous publication; 1-16
Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 19 (2018): Publicação contínua; 1-16
1809-6891
1518-2797
reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
collection Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacab@gmail.com
_version_ 1799874788251926528

Registros relacionados