The rejection of aesthetics in Boris Eikhenbaum’s formalist theory

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Donata Guerizoli Kempinska, Olga
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Signótica (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/sig/article/view/51530
Resumo: In taking as its starting point the rejection of the aesthetics in Boris Eikhenbaum’s text “The theory of the ‘Formal Method’” (1925), the paper discusses and exemplifies the process and the political motivation of this denial. The great importance of the aesthetics, above all in its German version, in Eikhenbaum’s previous reflection, especially related to his reception of Friedrich Schiller’s theory of tragic and sublime in 1917, calls indeed one’s attention. After this positive reception, we can observe, though, a quick rising of the increasingly negative interpretation, ended by the radical refutation of the aesthetics in the 1920s.
id UFG-8_2aa84fd8217e9c0dd376153da22a1dd2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/51530
network_acronym_str UFG-8
network_name_str Signótica (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The rejection of aesthetics in Boris Eikhenbaum’s formalist theoryEl rechazo de la estética en la teoría formalista de Boris EikhenbaumA rejeição da estética na teoria formalista de Boris Eikhenbaumruso. Boris Eikhenbaum. Estética. Teoría de la literatura.Formalismo russo. Boris Eikhenbaum. Estética. Teoria da Literatura.In taking as its starting point the rejection of the aesthetics in Boris Eikhenbaum’s text “The theory of the ‘Formal Method’” (1925), the paper discusses and exemplifies the process and the political motivation of this denial. The great importance of the aesthetics, above all in its German version, in Eikhenbaum’s previous reflection, especially related to his reception of Friedrich Schiller’s theory of tragic and sublime in 1917, calls indeed one’s attention. After this positive reception, we can observe, though, a quick rising of the increasingly negative interpretation, ended by the radical refutation of the aesthetics in the 1920s.Tomando como punto de partida el rechazo definitivo de la estética en el texto de Boris Eikhenbaum “La teoría del ‘Método Formal’” (1925), el trabajo discute el proceso y los motivos políticos de ese gesto negativo. La importancia de la estética, principalmente en su versión alemana, en la reflexión anterior de Eikhenbaum, especialmente relacionada con su recepción de la teoría de Schiller acerca del trágico y sublime en 1917, llama en efecto la atención. Después de esta recepción positiva, podemos observar, sin embargo, la rápida ascensión de la interpretación cada vez más negativa, llegando a la refutación radical de la estética en la década de 1920.Tomando como ponto de partida a rejeição definitiva da estética no texto “A Teoria do ‘Método Formal’” (1925), de Boris Eikhenbaum, o artigo discute o processo e os motivos políticos desse gesto negativo. A importância da estética, sobretudo de cunho alemão, na reflexão anterior de Eikhenbaum, relacionada antes de mais nada a sua recepção, em 1917, da teoria do trágico e do sublime de Friedrich Schiller, é, de fato, inegável. Depois dessa recepção positiva, pode-se observar, no entanto, uma rápida ascensão de uma interpretação cada vez mais negativa, que culmina na rejeição da estética em meados dos anos 20.Universidade Federal de Goiás2018-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/sig/article/view/5153010.5216/sig.v30i3.51530Signótica; Vol. 30 No. 3 (2018); 365-380Signótica; v. 30 n. 3 (2018); 365-3802316-36900103-7250reponame:Signótica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/sig/article/view/51530/26143Copyright (c) 2018 Signóticainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDonata Guerizoli Kempinska, Olga2022-04-20T12:58:09Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/51530Revistahttp://www.revistas.ufg.br/index.php/sig/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.ufg.br/sig/oaisignotica@gmail.com2316-36900103-7250opendoar:2022-04-20T12:58:09Signótica (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The rejection of aesthetics in Boris Eikhenbaum’s formalist theory
El rechazo de la estética en la teoría formalista de Boris Eikhenbaum
A rejeição da estética na teoria formalista de Boris Eikhenbaum
title The rejection of aesthetics in Boris Eikhenbaum’s formalist theory
spellingShingle The rejection of aesthetics in Boris Eikhenbaum’s formalist theory
Donata Guerizoli Kempinska, Olga
ruso. Boris Eikhenbaum. Estética. Teoría de la literatura.
Formalismo russo. Boris Eikhenbaum. Estética. Teoria da Literatura.
title_short The rejection of aesthetics in Boris Eikhenbaum’s formalist theory
title_full The rejection of aesthetics in Boris Eikhenbaum’s formalist theory
title_fullStr The rejection of aesthetics in Boris Eikhenbaum’s formalist theory
title_full_unstemmed The rejection of aesthetics in Boris Eikhenbaum’s formalist theory
title_sort The rejection of aesthetics in Boris Eikhenbaum’s formalist theory
author Donata Guerizoli Kempinska, Olga
author_facet Donata Guerizoli Kempinska, Olga
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Donata Guerizoli Kempinska, Olga
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ruso. Boris Eikhenbaum. Estética. Teoría de la literatura.
Formalismo russo. Boris Eikhenbaum. Estética. Teoria da Literatura.
topic ruso. Boris Eikhenbaum. Estética. Teoría de la literatura.
Formalismo russo. Boris Eikhenbaum. Estética. Teoria da Literatura.
description In taking as its starting point the rejection of the aesthetics in Boris Eikhenbaum’s text “The theory of the ‘Formal Method’” (1925), the paper discusses and exemplifies the process and the political motivation of this denial. The great importance of the aesthetics, above all in its German version, in Eikhenbaum’s previous reflection, especially related to his reception of Friedrich Schiller’s theory of tragic and sublime in 1917, calls indeed one’s attention. After this positive reception, we can observe, though, a quick rising of the increasingly negative interpretation, ended by the radical refutation of the aesthetics in the 1920s.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/sig/article/view/51530
10.5216/sig.v30i3.51530
url https://revistas.ufg.br/sig/article/view/51530
identifier_str_mv 10.5216/sig.v30i3.51530
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/sig/article/view/51530/26143
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Signótica
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Signótica
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Signótica; Vol. 30 No. 3 (2018); 365-380
Signótica; v. 30 n. 3 (2018); 365-380
2316-3690
0103-7250
reponame:Signótica (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Signótica (Online)
collection Signótica (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Signótica (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv signotica@gmail.com
_version_ 1789440406098804736

Registros relacionados