Poder e legitimidade na disputa pelo Jalapão

• Autor(a) principal: Caracristi, Maria de Fátima de Albuquerque
• Data de Publicação: 2016
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFG
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/6875
• topic: Poder; Jalapão; Capim dourado; Turismo; Power; Jalapão; Golden grass; Tourism; CIENCIAS HUMANAS::GEOGRAFIA

The principal problem is related to the implications of the government regarding to their authority to authenticity regulate the production and marketing of Golden grass in Jalapão which reverterbrates in Mumbuca community. This legitimacy will be analyzed by the theoretical construction of Max Weber, as well as analysis of the results achieved by the social indicators. This will prove to the Municipal Human Development Index (HDI) proposed to check people, groups and communities’vulnerability, which are historically excluded, as the case of the population of Mumbuca. The intention is to collect data that allow us to analyze the period between 2002 and 2012, exactly ten years, to examine what the Jalapão acheived in terms of improving quality of life for the people of Mumbuca. Looking at how the involvment of public policies ensured the preservation of stalks of Golden grass and the exapnsion of the manufaturer’s trade of Golden grass.The symbolism of the Golden grass, which was co-opted by the state and by private capital, is identified as the state of Tocantins. The same state as co-opted this identity matrix remained unprotected in this territory and population, which assists the grass to be stolen in its natural resource. In this sense, the state will once again be responsible for the deconstruction of that territory, and in promoting development. In semantic meaning, brings the first notion of the damage causin by the involviment of government. This results in a loss of the partnership in this community that remains including incentives of the state’s governmental / federal such as family welfare and rural retirement, proving beforehand the government‘s illegitimacy due to the market pressure.