The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Rónai |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/ronai/article/view/32068 |
Resumo: | In this paper, I discuss in detail one of the first conclusions drawn by Aristotle in the ergon argument. The paper provides an in-depth approach to Nicomachean Ethics’ lines 1098a3-4, where one reads: “λείπεται δὴ πρακτική τις τοῦ λόγον ἔχοντος”. I divide the discussion into two parts. In the first part, I put under scrutiny how one should take the word “πρακτική” and argue that one should avoid taking this word as meaning “practical” in the passage. I will argue in favor of taking it as meaning “active”. The exegetical inconvenience of taking “πρακτική” as meaning “practical” is the fact that it restricts the results achieved in the ergon argument by excluding the possibility of contemplation being considered a eudaimon life. In the second part, I discuss the expression “λόγον ἔχον” and provide some arguments to take it as preliminarily introducing the criterion of division of the virtues that will be spelled out in EN I.13 so that the λόγον-ἔχον part of the soul here also makes reference to the virtue of the non-rational part, i.e., virtue of character. I offer a deflationary view by showing that the moral psychology is developed in EN I.7 within the limits imposed by the ergon argument. |
id |
UFJF-3_0cf1da28a769d74d2e514282a3594eeb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/32068 |
network_acronym_str |
UFJF-3 |
network_name_str |
Rónai |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argumentA introdução da psicologia moral no argumento do ergonA introdução da psicologia moral no argumento do ergonergon argumentmoral psychologyvirtuesAristotleNichomaean Ethicsargumento do Ergonpsicologia moralvirtudesAristótelesÉtica a NicômacoIn this paper, I discuss in detail one of the first conclusions drawn by Aristotle in the ergon argument. The paper provides an in-depth approach to Nicomachean Ethics’ lines 1098a3-4, where one reads: “λείπεται δὴ πρακτική τις τοῦ λόγον ἔχοντος”. I divide the discussion into two parts. In the first part, I put under scrutiny how one should take the word “πρακτική” and argue that one should avoid taking this word as meaning “practical” in the passage. I will argue in favor of taking it as meaning “active”. The exegetical inconvenience of taking “πρακτική” as meaning “practical” is the fact that it restricts the results achieved in the ergon argument by excluding the possibility of contemplation being considered a eudaimon life. In the second part, I discuss the expression “λόγον ἔχον” and provide some arguments to take it as preliminarily introducing the criterion of division of the virtues that will be spelled out in EN I.13 so that the λόγον-ἔχον part of the soul here also makes reference to the virtue of the non-rational part, i.e., virtue of character. I offer a deflationary view by showing that the moral psychology is developed in EN I.7 within the limits imposed by the ergon argument.Neste artigo, eu discuto em detalhes uma das primeiras conclusões apresentadas por Aristóteles no argumento do ergon. O artigo traz uma discussão pormenorizada da afirmação “λείπεται δὴ πρακτική τις τοῦ λόγον ἔχοντος” nas linhas 1098a3-4 da Ética a Nicômaco. Eu divido a discussão em duas partes. Na primeira parte, eu coloco em discussão como se deve entender a palavra “πρακτική” e argumento que se deve evitar tomá-la como significando “prática”. Eu argumentarei em favor de entendê-la como significando “ativa”. O inconveniente exegético de tomar “πρακτική” com o significado de “prática” é que tal leitura restringe os resultados alcançados no argumento do ergon ao excluir a possibilidade de a vida contemplativa ser considerada uma vida eudaimon. Na segunda parte, eu discuto a expressão “λόγον ἔχον” e forneço alguns argumentos para entender a expressão como preliminarmente introduzindo o critério de divisão de virtudes que será apresentado em EN I.13 de modo que a expressão “λόγον ἔχον” na passagem discutida deve ser entendida como também fazendo referência à virtude da parte não-racional da alma, a saber, à virtude do caráter. Eu apresento uma interpretação deflacionária, argumentando que a psicologia moral é desenvolvida em EN I.7 tendo em vista os interesses argumentativos do argumento do ergon.Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora2020-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/ronai/article/view/3206810.34019/2318-3446.2020.v8.32068Rónai – Revista de Estudos Clássicos e Tradutórios; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020); 375-391Rónai – Revista de Estudos Clássicos e Tradutórios; v. 8 n. 2 (2020); 375-3912318-3446reponame:Rónaiinstname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)instacron:UFJFporhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/ronai/article/view/32068/21801Copyright (c) 2020 Angelo Antonio Pires de Oliveirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPires de Oliveira, Angelo Antonio2023-10-27T19:04:24Zoai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/32068Revistahttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/ronaiPUBhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/ronai/oairevistaronai@gmail.comhttps://doi.org/10.34019/2318-34462318-34462318-3446opendoar:2024-05-03T12:01:06.347394Rónai - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument A introdução da psicologia moral no argumento do ergon A introdução da psicologia moral no argumento do ergon |
title |
The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument |
spellingShingle |
The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument Pires de Oliveira, Angelo Antonio ergon argument moral psychology virtues Aristotle Nichomaean Ethics argumento do Ergon psicologia moral virtudes Aristóteles Ética a Nicômaco |
title_short |
The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument |
title_full |
The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument |
title_fullStr |
The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument |
title_full_unstemmed |
The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument |
title_sort |
The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument |
author |
Pires de Oliveira, Angelo Antonio |
author_facet |
Pires de Oliveira, Angelo Antonio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pires de Oliveira, Angelo Antonio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
ergon argument moral psychology virtues Aristotle Nichomaean Ethics argumento do Ergon psicologia moral virtudes Aristóteles Ética a Nicômaco |
topic |
ergon argument moral psychology virtues Aristotle Nichomaean Ethics argumento do Ergon psicologia moral virtudes Aristóteles Ética a Nicômaco |
description |
In this paper, I discuss in detail one of the first conclusions drawn by Aristotle in the ergon argument. The paper provides an in-depth approach to Nicomachean Ethics’ lines 1098a3-4, where one reads: “λείπεται δὴ πρακτική τις τοῦ λόγον ἔχοντος”. I divide the discussion into two parts. In the first part, I put under scrutiny how one should take the word “πρακτική” and argue that one should avoid taking this word as meaning “practical” in the passage. I will argue in favor of taking it as meaning “active”. The exegetical inconvenience of taking “πρακτική” as meaning “practical” is the fact that it restricts the results achieved in the ergon argument by excluding the possibility of contemplation being considered a eudaimon life. In the second part, I discuss the expression “λόγον ἔχον” and provide some arguments to take it as preliminarily introducing the criterion of division of the virtues that will be spelled out in EN I.13 so that the λόγον-ἔχον part of the soul here also makes reference to the virtue of the non-rational part, i.e., virtue of character. I offer a deflationary view by showing that the moral psychology is developed in EN I.7 within the limits imposed by the ergon argument. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/ronai/article/view/32068 10.34019/2318-3446.2020.v8.32068 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/ronai/article/view/32068 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.34019/2318-3446.2020.v8.32068 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/ronai/article/view/32068/21801 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Angelo Antonio Pires de Oliveira https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Angelo Antonio Pires de Oliveira https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Rónai – Revista de Estudos Clássicos e Tradutórios; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020); 375-391 Rónai – Revista de Estudos Clássicos e Tradutórios; v. 8 n. 2 (2020); 375-391 2318-3446 reponame:Rónai instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) instacron:UFJF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) |
instacron_str |
UFJF |
institution |
UFJF |
reponame_str |
Rónai |
collection |
Rónai |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Rónai - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistaronai@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798044934412959744 |