Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | HU Revista (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821 |
Resumo: | Hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) are the most commonly used renal replacement therapy. The nutritional status of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients can be influenced by the dialysis modality used. Objective: To compare the nutritional status of patients in HD and PD, through anthropometric and biochemical evaluation. This is a cross-sectional study carried out in the nephrology sector of the University Hospital of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora. The study consisted of 29 patients in PD and 36 in HD, totaling 65 patients. The data collected were: dry body weight, stature, body mass index (BMI), arm muscle area (BMA), arm muscle circumference (BMC), triceps skin fold and arm circumference. In addition, the biochemical tests: potassium, phosphorus, urea and albumin. It is possible to observe a higher prevalence of female sex in the PD modality in relation to HD (75% X 44.4%, p = 0.01). There was a difference in dialysis times between groups (SD: 41.86 ± 33.2 months X HD: 22.36 ± 5.4 months, p = 0.001). Regarding BMC classification, 48.3% of patients in PD and 22.2% in HD were classified as eutrophic (p = 0.001). As for BMA, 72.5% of patients in PD and 36.1% of patients in HD were classified as eutrophic (p = 0.001). In relation to the biochemical tests, only potassium had a significant difference between the groups (SD: 4.9 ± 0.73 mEq / L and HD: 5.64 ± 0.78 mEq / L, p = 0.01). In the present study, patients in PD present better classification in relation to BMC and BMA, in addition to better control of serum potassium, compared to patients in HD. |
id |
UFJF-8_2c17033fc0d96d79b29f62b7fb5c50f2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/2821 |
network_acronym_str |
UFJF-8 |
network_name_str |
HU Revista (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status?Pacientes em diálise peritoneal e em hemodiálise: Existe diferença em relação ao estado nutricional?Dialysis. Peritoneal dialysis. Hemodialysis. Nutritional status. Biochemical tests. Anthropometry.Diálise. Diálise peritoneal. Hemodiálise. Estado Nutricional. Exames Bioquímicos. Antropometria.Hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) are the most commonly used renal replacement therapy. The nutritional status of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients can be influenced by the dialysis modality used. Objective: To compare the nutritional status of patients in HD and PD, through anthropometric and biochemical evaluation. This is a cross-sectional study carried out in the nephrology sector of the University Hospital of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora. The study consisted of 29 patients in PD and 36 in HD, totaling 65 patients. The data collected were: dry body weight, stature, body mass index (BMI), arm muscle area (BMA), arm muscle circumference (BMC), triceps skin fold and arm circumference. In addition, the biochemical tests: potassium, phosphorus, urea and albumin. It is possible to observe a higher prevalence of female sex in the PD modality in relation to HD (75% X 44.4%, p = 0.01). There was a difference in dialysis times between groups (SD: 41.86 ± 33.2 months X HD: 22.36 ± 5.4 months, p = 0.001). Regarding BMC classification, 48.3% of patients in PD and 22.2% in HD were classified as eutrophic (p = 0.001). As for BMA, 72.5% of patients in PD and 36.1% of patients in HD were classified as eutrophic (p = 0.001). In relation to the biochemical tests, only potassium had a significant difference between the groups (SD: 4.9 ± 0.73 mEq / L and HD: 5.64 ± 0.78 mEq / L, p = 0.01). In the present study, patients in PD present better classification in relation to BMC and BMA, in addition to better control of serum potassium, compared to patients in HD.A hemodiálise (HD) e a diálise peritoneal (DP) são as terapias renais de substituição mais comumente utilizadas, sendo que o estado nutricional dos pacientes com Doença Renal Crônica (DRC) pode ser influenciado pela modalidade de diálise utilizada. Objetivo: Comparar o estado nutricional de pacientes em HD e em DP, por meio da avaliação antropométrica e bioquímica. Trata-se de um estudo transversal, realizado no setor de nefrologia do Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora. O estudo foi constituído por 29 pacientes em DP e 36 em HD, totalizando 65 pacientes. Os dados coletados foram: peso corporal seco, estatura, Índice de Massa Corporal (IMC), área muscular do braço (AMB), circunferência muscular do braço (CMB), prega cutânea tricipital (PCT) e circunferência do braço (CB); além dos exames bioquímicos: potássio, fósforo, uréia e albumina. Pode-se observar maior prevalência do sexo feminino na modalidade DP em relação a HD (75% X 44,4%, p = 0,01). Houve diferença nos tempos em diálise entre os grupos (DP: 41,86 ±33,2 meses X HD: 22,36 ±5,4 meses, p = 0,001). Em relação à classificação da CMB, 48,3% dos pacientes em DP e 22,2% em HD foram classificados como eutróficos (p = 0.001). Quanto à AMB, 72,5% dos pacientes em DP e 36,1% dos pacientes em HD foram classificados como eutróficos (p = 0.001). Em relação aos exames bioquímicos, somente o potássio apresentou diferença significante entre os grupos (DP: 4,9 ±0,73 mEq/L e HD: 5,64 ±0,78 mEq/L, p = 0,01). No presente estudo, os pacientes em DP apresentam melhor classificação em relação a CMB e AMB, além de melhor controle do potássio sérico, em relação aos pacientes em HD.Editora UFJF2019-01-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtOrPesquisa transversalapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/282110.34019/1982-8047.2017.v43.2821HU Revista; v. 43 n. 4 (2017); 325 - 3301982-80470103-3123reponame:HU Revista (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)instacron:UFJFporhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16086https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16087https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16088https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16089https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16090Alvarenga, Livia de AlmeidaMoreira, Michelle AndradePereira, Beatriz CristinaAguiar, Aline Silva deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-07-19T03:27:08Zoai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/2821Revistahttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevistaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/oairevista.hurevista@ufjf.edu.br1982-80470103-3123opendoar:2019-07-19T03:27:08HU Revista (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status? Pacientes em diálise peritoneal e em hemodiálise: Existe diferença em relação ao estado nutricional? |
title |
Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status? |
spellingShingle |
Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status? Alvarenga, Livia de Almeida Dialysis. Peritoneal dialysis. Hemodialysis. Nutritional status. Biochemical tests. Anthropometry. Diálise. Diálise peritoneal. Hemodiálise. Estado Nutricional. Exames Bioquímicos. Antropometria. |
title_short |
Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status? |
title_full |
Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status? |
title_fullStr |
Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status? |
title_sort |
Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status? |
author |
Alvarenga, Livia de Almeida |
author_facet |
Alvarenga, Livia de Almeida Moreira, Michelle Andrade Pereira, Beatriz Cristina Aguiar, Aline Silva de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Moreira, Michelle Andrade Pereira, Beatriz Cristina Aguiar, Aline Silva de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alvarenga, Livia de Almeida Moreira, Michelle Andrade Pereira, Beatriz Cristina Aguiar, Aline Silva de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dialysis. Peritoneal dialysis. Hemodialysis. Nutritional status. Biochemical tests. Anthropometry. Diálise. Diálise peritoneal. Hemodiálise. Estado Nutricional. Exames Bioquímicos. Antropometria. |
topic |
Dialysis. Peritoneal dialysis. Hemodialysis. Nutritional status. Biochemical tests. Anthropometry. Diálise. Diálise peritoneal. Hemodiálise. Estado Nutricional. Exames Bioquímicos. Antropometria. |
description |
Hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) are the most commonly used renal replacement therapy. The nutritional status of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients can be influenced by the dialysis modality used. Objective: To compare the nutritional status of patients in HD and PD, through anthropometric and biochemical evaluation. This is a cross-sectional study carried out in the nephrology sector of the University Hospital of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora. The study consisted of 29 patients in PD and 36 in HD, totaling 65 patients. The data collected were: dry body weight, stature, body mass index (BMI), arm muscle area (BMA), arm muscle circumference (BMC), triceps skin fold and arm circumference. In addition, the biochemical tests: potassium, phosphorus, urea and albumin. It is possible to observe a higher prevalence of female sex in the PD modality in relation to HD (75% X 44.4%, p = 0.01). There was a difference in dialysis times between groups (SD: 41.86 ± 33.2 months X HD: 22.36 ± 5.4 months, p = 0.001). Regarding BMC classification, 48.3% of patients in PD and 22.2% in HD were classified as eutrophic (p = 0.001). As for BMA, 72.5% of patients in PD and 36.1% of patients in HD were classified as eutrophic (p = 0.001). In relation to the biochemical tests, only potassium had a significant difference between the groups (SD: 4.9 ± 0.73 mEq / L and HD: 5.64 ± 0.78 mEq / L, p = 0.01). In the present study, patients in PD present better classification in relation to BMC and BMA, in addition to better control of serum potassium, compared to patients in HD. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion ArtOr Pesquisa transversal |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821 10.34019/1982-8047.2017.v43.2821 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.34019/1982-8047.2017.v43.2821 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/pdf https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16086 https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16087 https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16088 https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16089 https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16090 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/pdf application/pdf application/msword application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora UFJF |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora UFJF |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
HU Revista; v. 43 n. 4 (2017); 325 - 330 1982-8047 0103-3123 reponame:HU Revista (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) instacron:UFJF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) |
instacron_str |
UFJF |
institution |
UFJF |
reponame_str |
HU Revista (Online) |
collection |
HU Revista (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
HU Revista (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.hurevista@ufjf.edu.br |
_version_ |
1796798242429599744 |