Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alvarenga, Livia de Almeida
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Moreira, Michelle Andrade, Pereira, Beatriz Cristina, Aguiar, Aline Silva de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: HU Revista (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821
Resumo: Hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) are the most commonly used renal replacement therapy. The nutritional status of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients can be influenced by the dialysis modality used. Objective: To compare the nutritional status of patients in HD and PD, through anthropometric and biochemical evaluation. This is a cross-sectional study carried out in the nephrology sector of the University Hospital of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora. The study consisted of 29 patients in PD and 36 in HD, totaling 65 patients. The data collected were: dry body weight, stature, body mass index (BMI), arm muscle area (BMA), arm muscle circumference (BMC), triceps skin fold and arm circumference. In addition, the biochemical tests: potassium, phosphorus, urea and albumin. It is possible to observe a higher prevalence of female sex in the PD modality in relation to HD (75% X 44.4%, p = 0.01). There was a difference in dialysis times between groups (SD: 41.86 ± 33.2 months X HD: 22.36 ± 5.4 months, p = 0.001). Regarding BMC classification, 48.3% of patients in PD and 22.2% in HD were classified as eutrophic (p = 0.001). As for BMA, 72.5% of patients in PD and 36.1% of patients in HD were classified as eutrophic (p = 0.001). In relation to the biochemical tests, only potassium had a significant difference between the groups (SD: 4.9 ± 0.73 mEq / L and HD: 5.64 ± 0.78 mEq / L, p = 0.01). In the present study, patients in PD present better classification in relation to BMC and BMA, in addition to better control of serum potassium, compared to patients in HD.
id UFJF-8_2c17033fc0d96d79b29f62b7fb5c50f2
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/2821
network_acronym_str UFJF-8
network_name_str HU Revista (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status?Pacientes em diálise peritoneal e em hemodiálise: Existe diferença em relação ao estado nutricional?Dialysis. Peritoneal dialysis. Hemodialysis. Nutritional status. Biochemical tests. Anthropometry.Diálise. Diálise peritoneal. Hemodiálise. Estado Nutricional. Exames Bioquímicos. Antropometria.Hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) are the most commonly used renal replacement therapy. The nutritional status of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients can be influenced by the dialysis modality used. Objective: To compare the nutritional status of patients in HD and PD, through anthropometric and biochemical evaluation. This is a cross-sectional study carried out in the nephrology sector of the University Hospital of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora. The study consisted of 29 patients in PD and 36 in HD, totaling 65 patients. The data collected were: dry body weight, stature, body mass index (BMI), arm muscle area (BMA), arm muscle circumference (BMC), triceps skin fold and arm circumference. In addition, the biochemical tests: potassium, phosphorus, urea and albumin. It is possible to observe a higher prevalence of female sex in the PD modality in relation to HD (75% X 44.4%, p = 0.01). There was a difference in dialysis times between groups (SD: 41.86 ± 33.2 months X HD: 22.36 ± 5.4 months, p = 0.001). Regarding BMC classification, 48.3% of patients in PD and 22.2% in HD were classified as eutrophic (p = 0.001). As for BMA, 72.5% of patients in PD and 36.1% of patients in HD were classified as eutrophic (p = 0.001). In relation to the biochemical tests, only potassium had a significant difference between the groups (SD: 4.9 ± 0.73 mEq / L and HD: 5.64 ± 0.78 mEq / L, p = 0.01). In the present study, patients in PD present better classification in relation to BMC and BMA, in addition to better control of serum potassium, compared to patients in HD.A hemodiálise (HD) e a diálise peritoneal (DP) são as terapias renais de substituição mais comumente utilizadas, sendo que o estado nutricional dos pacientes com Doença Renal Crônica (DRC) pode ser influenciado pela modalidade de diálise utilizada. Objetivo: Comparar o estado nutricional de pacientes em HD e em DP, por meio da avaliação antropométrica e bioquímica. Trata-se de um estudo transversal, realizado no setor de nefrologia do Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora. O estudo foi constituído por 29 pacientes em DP e 36 em HD, totalizando 65 pacientes. Os dados coletados foram: peso corporal seco, estatura, Índice de Massa Corporal (IMC), área muscular do braço (AMB), circunferência muscular do braço (CMB), prega cutânea tricipital (PCT) e circunferência do braço (CB); além dos exames bioquímicos: potássio, fósforo, uréia e albumina.  Pode-se observar maior prevalência do sexo feminino na modalidade DP em relação a HD (75% X 44,4%, p = 0,01).  Houve diferença nos tempos em diálise entre os grupos (DP: 41,86 ±33,2 meses X HD: 22,36 ±5,4 meses, p = 0,001). Em relação à classificação da CMB, 48,3% dos pacientes em DP e 22,2% em HD foram classificados como eutróficos (p = 0.001). Quanto à AMB, 72,5% dos pacientes em DP e 36,1% dos pacientes em HD foram classificados como eutróficos (p = 0.001). Em relação aos exames bioquímicos, somente o potássio apresentou diferença significante entre os grupos (DP: 4,9 ±0,73 mEq/L e HD: 5,64 ±0,78 mEq/L, p = 0,01). No presente estudo, os pacientes em DP apresentam melhor classificação em relação a CMB e AMB, além de melhor controle do potássio sérico, em relação aos pacientes em HD.Editora UFJF2019-01-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtOrPesquisa transversalapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/282110.34019/1982-8047.2017.v43.2821HU Revista; v. 43 n. 4 (2017); 325 - 3301982-80470103-3123reponame:HU Revista (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)instacron:UFJFporhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16086https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16087https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16088https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16089https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16090Alvarenga, Livia de AlmeidaMoreira, Michelle AndradePereira, Beatriz CristinaAguiar, Aline Silva deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-07-19T03:27:08Zoai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/2821Revistahttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevistaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/oairevista.hurevista@ufjf.edu.br1982-80470103-3123opendoar:2019-07-19T03:27:08HU Revista (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status?
Pacientes em diálise peritoneal e em hemodiálise: Existe diferença em relação ao estado nutricional?
title Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status?
spellingShingle Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status?
Alvarenga, Livia de Almeida
Dialysis. Peritoneal dialysis. Hemodialysis. Nutritional status. Biochemical tests. Anthropometry.
Diálise. Diálise peritoneal. Hemodiálise. Estado Nutricional. Exames Bioquímicos. Antropometria.
title_short Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status?
title_full Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status?
title_fullStr Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status?
title_full_unstemmed Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status?
title_sort Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status?
author Alvarenga, Livia de Almeida
author_facet Alvarenga, Livia de Almeida
Moreira, Michelle Andrade
Pereira, Beatriz Cristina
Aguiar, Aline Silva de
author_role author
author2 Moreira, Michelle Andrade
Pereira, Beatriz Cristina
Aguiar, Aline Silva de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alvarenga, Livia de Almeida
Moreira, Michelle Andrade
Pereira, Beatriz Cristina
Aguiar, Aline Silva de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dialysis. Peritoneal dialysis. Hemodialysis. Nutritional status. Biochemical tests. Anthropometry.
Diálise. Diálise peritoneal. Hemodiálise. Estado Nutricional. Exames Bioquímicos. Antropometria.
topic Dialysis. Peritoneal dialysis. Hemodialysis. Nutritional status. Biochemical tests. Anthropometry.
Diálise. Diálise peritoneal. Hemodiálise. Estado Nutricional. Exames Bioquímicos. Antropometria.
description Hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) are the most commonly used renal replacement therapy. The nutritional status of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients can be influenced by the dialysis modality used. Objective: To compare the nutritional status of patients in HD and PD, through anthropometric and biochemical evaluation. This is a cross-sectional study carried out in the nephrology sector of the University Hospital of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora. The study consisted of 29 patients in PD and 36 in HD, totaling 65 patients. The data collected were: dry body weight, stature, body mass index (BMI), arm muscle area (BMA), arm muscle circumference (BMC), triceps skin fold and arm circumference. In addition, the biochemical tests: potassium, phosphorus, urea and albumin. It is possible to observe a higher prevalence of female sex in the PD modality in relation to HD (75% X 44.4%, p = 0.01). There was a difference in dialysis times between groups (SD: 41.86 ± 33.2 months X HD: 22.36 ± 5.4 months, p = 0.001). Regarding BMC classification, 48.3% of patients in PD and 22.2% in HD were classified as eutrophic (p = 0.001). As for BMA, 72.5% of patients in PD and 36.1% of patients in HD were classified as eutrophic (p = 0.001). In relation to the biochemical tests, only potassium had a significant difference between the groups (SD: 4.9 ± 0.73 mEq / L and HD: 5.64 ± 0.78 mEq / L, p = 0.01). In the present study, patients in PD present better classification in relation to BMC and BMA, in addition to better control of serum potassium, compared to patients in HD.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
ArtOr
Pesquisa transversal
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821
10.34019/1982-8047.2017.v43.2821
url https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821
identifier_str_mv 10.34019/1982-8047.2017.v43.2821
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/pdf
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16086
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16087
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16088
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16089
https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821/16090
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/msword
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora UFJF
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora UFJF
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv HU Revista; v. 43 n. 4 (2017); 325 - 330
1982-8047
0103-3123
reponame:HU Revista (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
instacron:UFJF
instname_str Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
instacron_str UFJF
institution UFJF
reponame_str HU Revista (Online)
collection HU Revista (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv HU Revista (Online) - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.hurevista@ufjf.edu.br
_version_ 1796798242429599744