Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Iori,Piero
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Dias Junior,Moacir de Souza, Ajayi,Ayodele Ebenezer, Guimarães,Paulo Tácito Gontijo, Pais,Paula Sant'Anna Moreira, Andrade,Maria Luiza de Carvalho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542013000200003
Resumo: Precompression stress is an important property for assessment of tropical soil structure sustainability and is often determined in laboratory tests. The objective of this study was to compare the load bearing capacity models obtained with controlled moisture in laboratory and those obtained with natural field moistures determined a long one year. The evaluation of soil structural sustainability follows four distinct steps: soil sampling in the field, uniaxial compression test of the samples in the laboratory, determination of precompression stress and estimation of the load bearing capacity models. Laboratory estimates of precompression stress were obtained from moisture controlled in laboratory and from natural moisture determined in a field a long one year. In this process, the soil samples were saturated by capillarity with distilled water in laboratory, and after 48 hours, the samples were air dried to obtain the different moisture contents. Then, the precompression stress was determined for this both conditions. To verify if the load bearing capacity models obtained with controlled moisture in laboratory may represent the load bearing models obtained with natural field moisture, these models were compared using the homogeneity test procedure. It was observed that 75% of field models analyzed were similar to the laboratory models. Thus, due to the similarity on the load-bearing capacity models obtained using natural (field) or controlled (laboratory) moisture contents, the assessment of the soil structure sustainability can be done using both methods.
id UFLA-2_98060ba84bb7df0c1d24d47b7f0ae008
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-70542013000200003
network_acronym_str UFLA-2
network_name_str Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantationsAgricultural trafficCoffea Arabica L.homogeneity testprecompression stressPrecompression stress is an important property for assessment of tropical soil structure sustainability and is often determined in laboratory tests. The objective of this study was to compare the load bearing capacity models obtained with controlled moisture in laboratory and those obtained with natural field moistures determined a long one year. The evaluation of soil structural sustainability follows four distinct steps: soil sampling in the field, uniaxial compression test of the samples in the laboratory, determination of precompression stress and estimation of the load bearing capacity models. Laboratory estimates of precompression stress were obtained from moisture controlled in laboratory and from natural moisture determined in a field a long one year. In this process, the soil samples were saturated by capillarity with distilled water in laboratory, and after 48 hours, the samples were air dried to obtain the different moisture contents. Then, the precompression stress was determined for this both conditions. To verify if the load bearing capacity models obtained with controlled moisture in laboratory may represent the load bearing models obtained with natural field moisture, these models were compared using the homogeneity test procedure. It was observed that 75% of field models analyzed were similar to the laboratory models. Thus, due to the similarity on the load-bearing capacity models obtained using natural (field) or controlled (laboratory) moisture contents, the assessment of the soil structure sustainability can be done using both methods.Editora da UFLA2013-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542013000200003Ciência e Agrotecnologia v.37 n.2 2013reponame:Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLA10.1590/S1413-70542013000200003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIori,PieroDias Junior,Moacir de SouzaAjayi,Ayodele EbenezerGuimarães,Paulo Tácito GontijoPais,Paula Sant'Anna MoreiraAndrade,Maria Luiza de Carvalhoeng2013-03-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-70542013000200003Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/cagroPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||renpaiva@dbi.ufla.br|| editora@editora.ufla.br1981-18291413-7054opendoar:2022-11-22T16:31:16.071916Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations
title Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations
spellingShingle Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations
Iori,Piero
Agricultural traffic
Coffea Arabica L.
homogeneity test
precompression stress
title_short Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations
title_full Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations
title_fullStr Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations
title_sort Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations
author Iori,Piero
author_facet Iori,Piero
Dias Junior,Moacir de Souza
Ajayi,Ayodele Ebenezer
Guimarães,Paulo Tácito Gontijo
Pais,Paula Sant'Anna Moreira
Andrade,Maria Luiza de Carvalho
author_role author
author2 Dias Junior,Moacir de Souza
Ajayi,Ayodele Ebenezer
Guimarães,Paulo Tácito Gontijo
Pais,Paula Sant'Anna Moreira
Andrade,Maria Luiza de Carvalho
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Iori,Piero
Dias Junior,Moacir de Souza
Ajayi,Ayodele Ebenezer
Guimarães,Paulo Tácito Gontijo
Pais,Paula Sant'Anna Moreira
Andrade,Maria Luiza de Carvalho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agricultural traffic
Coffea Arabica L.
homogeneity test
precompression stress
topic Agricultural traffic
Coffea Arabica L.
homogeneity test
precompression stress
description Precompression stress is an important property for assessment of tropical soil structure sustainability and is often determined in laboratory tests. The objective of this study was to compare the load bearing capacity models obtained with controlled moisture in laboratory and those obtained with natural field moistures determined a long one year. The evaluation of soil structural sustainability follows four distinct steps: soil sampling in the field, uniaxial compression test of the samples in the laboratory, determination of precompression stress and estimation of the load bearing capacity models. Laboratory estimates of precompression stress were obtained from moisture controlled in laboratory and from natural moisture determined in a field a long one year. In this process, the soil samples were saturated by capillarity with distilled water in laboratory, and after 48 hours, the samples were air dried to obtain the different moisture contents. Then, the precompression stress was determined for this both conditions. To verify if the load bearing capacity models obtained with controlled moisture in laboratory may represent the load bearing models obtained with natural field moisture, these models were compared using the homogeneity test procedure. It was observed that 75% of field models analyzed were similar to the laboratory models. Thus, due to the similarity on the load-bearing capacity models obtained using natural (field) or controlled (laboratory) moisture contents, the assessment of the soil structure sustainability can be done using both methods.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542013000200003
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542013000200003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1413-70542013000200003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da UFLA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da UFLA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência e Agrotecnologia v.37 n.2 2013
reponame:Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron:UFLA
instname_str Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron_str UFLA
institution UFLA
reponame_str Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
collection Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||renpaiva@dbi.ufla.br|| editora@editora.ufla.br
_version_ 1799874969177423872