Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Iori, Piero
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Dias Junior, Moacir de Souza, Ajayi, Ayodele Ebenezer, Guimarães, Paulo Tácito Gontijo, Pais, Paula Sant’Anna Moreira, Andrade, Maria Luiza de Carvalho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFLA
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/39794
Resumo: Precompression stress is an important property for assessment of tropical soil structure sustainability and is often determined in laboratory tests. The objective of this study was to compare the load bearing capacity models obtained with controlled moisture in laboratory and those obtained with natural field moistures determined a long one year. The evaluation of soil structural sustainability follows four distinct steps: soil sampling in the field, uniaxial compression test of the samples in the laboratory, determination of precompression stress and estimation of the load bearing capacity models. Laboratory estimates of precompression stress were obtained from moisture controlled in laboratory and from natural moisture determined in a field a long one year. In this process, the soil samples were saturated by capillarity with distilled water in laboratory, and after 48 hours, the samples were air dried to obtain the different moisture contents. Then, the precompression stress was determined for this both conditions. To verify if the load bearing capacity models obtained with controlled moisture in laboratory may represent the load bearing models obtained with natural field moisture, these models were compared using the homogeneity test procedure. It was observed that 75% of field models analyzed were similar to the laboratory models. Thus, due to the similarity on the load-bearing capacity models obtained using natural (field) or controlled (laboratory) moisture contents, the assessment of the soil structure sustainability can be done using both methods.
id UFLA_219588b930ab9746745cd65ac0eda644
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:1/39794
network_acronym_str UFLA
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFLA
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantationsComparação de modelos de capacidade de suporte de carga do solo de campo e laboratório em plantações de caféAgricultural trafficCoffea Arabica L.Homogeneity testPrecompression stressTráfego agrícolaTeste de homogeneidadePressão de pré-consolidaçãoPrecompression stress is an important property for assessment of tropical soil structure sustainability and is often determined in laboratory tests. The objective of this study was to compare the load bearing capacity models obtained with controlled moisture in laboratory and those obtained with natural field moistures determined a long one year. The evaluation of soil structural sustainability follows four distinct steps: soil sampling in the field, uniaxial compression test of the samples in the laboratory, determination of precompression stress and estimation of the load bearing capacity models. Laboratory estimates of precompression stress were obtained from moisture controlled in laboratory and from natural moisture determined in a field a long one year. In this process, the soil samples were saturated by capillarity with distilled water in laboratory, and after 48 hours, the samples were air dried to obtain the different moisture contents. Then, the precompression stress was determined for this both conditions. To verify if the load bearing capacity models obtained with controlled moisture in laboratory may represent the load bearing models obtained with natural field moisture, these models were compared using the homogeneity test procedure. It was observed that 75% of field models analyzed were similar to the laboratory models. Thus, due to the similarity on the load-bearing capacity models obtained using natural (field) or controlled (laboratory) moisture contents, the assessment of the soil structure sustainability can be done using both methods.Pressão de pré-consolidação é uma importante propriedade na avaliação da sustentabilidade estrutural do solo e é determinada em testes de laboratório. Neste estudo, objetivou-se comparar modelos de capacidade de suporte de carga obtidos com umidade controlada em laboratório e com umidade natural de campo ao longo de um ano. A avaliação da sustentabilidade estrutural do solo ocorreu em quatro etapas: coleta de amostras de solo indeformado, ensaio de compressão uniaxial das amostras em laboratório, estimativa da pressão de pré-consolidação e obtenção dos modelos de capacidade de suporte de carga. As estimativas da pressão de pré-consolidação de laboratório e de campo foram obtidas com umidades controladas em laboratório e com umidade de campo, respectivamente, ao longo de um ano. No laboratório, a saturaçaõ das amostras se deu por capilaridade, com água destilada e depois de 48 horas, essas amostras foram secas ao ar para obter diferentes valores de umidade. Em seguida, realizou-se o ensaio de compressão uniaxial dessas amostras e a pressão de pré-consolidação foi determinada para as duas condições aqui proposta. Para verificar se os modelos de capacidade de suporte de carga com umidade controlada em laboratório podem representar os modelos de capacidade de suporte de carga de umidade natural, esses modelos foram comparados utilizando o teste de homogeneidade de dados. Observou-se semelhança em 75% dos modelos de umidade de campo com modelos de umidade controlada em laboratório. Portanto, em razão da similaridade, a análise da sustentabilidade estrutural do solo pode ser feita por ambos os modelos de capacidade de suporte carga, ou seja, modelos obtidos com amostras de solo com umidade natural (campo) ou com umidade controlada (laboratório).Editora UFLA (Editora da Universidade Federal de Lavras)2020-04-06T10:33:30Z2020-04-06T10:33:30Z2013-04info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfIORI, P. et al. Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, Lavras, v. 37, n. 2, p. 130-137, Mar./Apr. 2013. DOI: 10.1590/S1413-70542013000200003.http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/39794Ciência e Agrotecnologiareponame:Repositório Institucional da UFLAinstname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLAAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIori, PieroDias Junior, Moacir de SouzaAjayi, Ayodele EbenezerGuimarães, Paulo Tácito GontijoPais, Paula Sant’Anna MoreiraAndrade, Maria Luiza de Carvalhoeng2020-04-06T10:33:31Zoai:localhost:1/39794Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ufla.br/oai/requestnivaldo@ufla.br || repositorio.biblioteca@ufla.bropendoar:2020-04-06T10:33:31Repositório Institucional da UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations
Comparação de modelos de capacidade de suporte de carga do solo de campo e laboratório em plantações de café
title Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations
spellingShingle Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations
Iori, Piero
Agricultural traffic
Coffea Arabica L.
Homogeneity test
Precompression stress
Tráfego agrícola
Teste de homogeneidade
Pressão de pré-consolidação
title_short Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations
title_full Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations
title_fullStr Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations
title_sort Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations
author Iori, Piero
author_facet Iori, Piero
Dias Junior, Moacir de Souza
Ajayi, Ayodele Ebenezer
Guimarães, Paulo Tácito Gontijo
Pais, Paula Sant’Anna Moreira
Andrade, Maria Luiza de Carvalho
author_role author
author2 Dias Junior, Moacir de Souza
Ajayi, Ayodele Ebenezer
Guimarães, Paulo Tácito Gontijo
Pais, Paula Sant’Anna Moreira
Andrade, Maria Luiza de Carvalho
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Iori, Piero
Dias Junior, Moacir de Souza
Ajayi, Ayodele Ebenezer
Guimarães, Paulo Tácito Gontijo
Pais, Paula Sant’Anna Moreira
Andrade, Maria Luiza de Carvalho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agricultural traffic
Coffea Arabica L.
Homogeneity test
Precompression stress
Tráfego agrícola
Teste de homogeneidade
Pressão de pré-consolidação
topic Agricultural traffic
Coffea Arabica L.
Homogeneity test
Precompression stress
Tráfego agrícola
Teste de homogeneidade
Pressão de pré-consolidação
description Precompression stress is an important property for assessment of tropical soil structure sustainability and is often determined in laboratory tests. The objective of this study was to compare the load bearing capacity models obtained with controlled moisture in laboratory and those obtained with natural field moistures determined a long one year. The evaluation of soil structural sustainability follows four distinct steps: soil sampling in the field, uniaxial compression test of the samples in the laboratory, determination of precompression stress and estimation of the load bearing capacity models. Laboratory estimates of precompression stress were obtained from moisture controlled in laboratory and from natural moisture determined in a field a long one year. In this process, the soil samples were saturated by capillarity with distilled water in laboratory, and after 48 hours, the samples were air dried to obtain the different moisture contents. Then, the precompression stress was determined for this both conditions. To verify if the load bearing capacity models obtained with controlled moisture in laboratory may represent the load bearing models obtained with natural field moisture, these models were compared using the homogeneity test procedure. It was observed that 75% of field models analyzed were similar to the laboratory models. Thus, due to the similarity on the load-bearing capacity models obtained using natural (field) or controlled (laboratory) moisture contents, the assessment of the soil structure sustainability can be done using both methods.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-04
2020-04-06T10:33:30Z
2020-04-06T10:33:30Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv IORI, P. et al. Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, Lavras, v. 37, n. 2, p. 130-137, Mar./Apr. 2013. DOI: 10.1590/S1413-70542013000200003.
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/39794
identifier_str_mv IORI, P. et al. Comparison of field and laboratory models of the load bearing capacity in coffee plantations. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, Lavras, v. 37, n. 2, p. 130-137, Mar./Apr. 2013. DOI: 10.1590/S1413-70542013000200003.
url http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/39794
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora UFLA (Editora da Universidade Federal de Lavras)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora UFLA (Editora da Universidade Federal de Lavras)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência e Agrotecnologia
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFLA
instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron:UFLA
instname_str Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron_str UFLA
institution UFLA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFLA
collection Repositório Institucional da UFLA
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv nivaldo@ufla.br || repositorio.biblioteca@ufla.br
_version_ 1807835223289757696