EL USO DE LOS RESULTADOS DE LA EVALUACIÓN DE CURSOS DE GRADO POR PARTE DE LA UEMA EM BASE AL REGLAMENTO CEE

• Autor(a) principal: Santana, Fabíola de Jesus Soares
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Outros Autores: Silva, Nadja Fonsêca da
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Cadernos de Pesquisa (Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação, Universidade Federal do Maranhão. Online)
• Texto Completo: http://periodicoseletronicos.ufma.br/index.php/cadernosdepesquisa/article/view/19493
• topic: evaluation and regulation policies; State Board of Education; UEMA; use of results; challenges and possibilities; políticas de avaliação e regulação; Conselho Estadual de Educação; UEMA; uso dos resultados; qualidade educacional; desafios e possibilidades; políticas de evaluaciòn y regulaciòn; Junta Estatal de Educaciòn; UEMA; uso de resultados; calidad educativa; desafios y posibilidades

This paper aims to analyze the challenges and possibilities for the use of the results of the evaluation of the dimensions and indicators of the Assessment Instrument for undergraduate courses at SINAES, taken as a reference by CEE-MA in the evaluation processes for recognition and renewal of recognition of undergraduate courses. UEMA graduation. To carry out this study, a guiding question was established: what actions are developed by the Undergraduate Course Directors based on the results of the CEE/MA assessments? As a methodological approach, a qualitative approach was used, of the case study type; the literature review; analysis of CEE documentary and legal sources; mapping the state of knowledge with studies from regulations that deal with the role and attributions of CEE-MA regarding the regulation and evaluation policies of Higher Education. The results reveal that UEMA has developed planned actions based on the results of internal and external evaluation reports, as well as in line with the PDI, to raise the quality of teaching from the perspective of formative evaluation, breaking with the culture of control, efficiency and effectiveness demanded by the market. We consider that a broad discussion is necessary with the managers of UEMA (Rectorate, Pro-Rectories, Center Directorates, Course Directors, Department Heads, Course Collegiate, Structuring Teaching Nucleus (NDE), Own Assessment Commission/CPA) on the relevance of critical analysis of regulation and evaluation policies, in the perspective of the democratic construction of university autonomy with commitments anchored to the internal and external community focused on social quality.