THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Kriterion (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36072 |
Resumo: | The passage between 276b1 and 277b3 of the dialogue Phaedrus has been used to indicate a dichotomy between orality and writing, as a sign of an irreconcilable relationship between dialectics and writing. Both of them are associated respectively to a serious activity (spoudé) and a game (paidiá). In our reading, we intend to show that it is not possible to subscribe to such association, considering, on the one hand, that the passage must be read as a kind of synthesis of a more comprehensive reflection (the determination of the philosophical lógos, i.e., dialectics) and, on the other hand, that it is possible to see in this context layers of meaning produced by an intertextual dialogue (the debate on writing between Alcidamas and Isocrate). In this sense, we propose an interpretation which takes into account an immanent analysis of the passage, showing that it does not display signifiers for subscribing the dichotomy between orality and writing, followed by a discussion that puts it back in the overall context of the dialogue, by analysing the philosophical meaning of the image of the “Garden of Adonis” and the opposition between paidiá and spoudé. |
id |
UFMG-10_b7e87030d3682f17781972ae49338e9a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/36072 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-10 |
network_name_str |
Kriterion (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3)A IMAGEM DO “JARDIM DE ADÔNIS” E A REFLEXÃO SOBRE A ESCRITA COMO PARADIGMA PARA DETERMINAÇÃO DO LÓGOS NO FEDRO DE PLATÃO (276B1-277B3)PlatãoescritaoralidadedialéticalógosPlatowritingoralitydialeticslógosThe passage between 276b1 and 277b3 of the dialogue Phaedrus has been used to indicate a dichotomy between orality and writing, as a sign of an irreconcilable relationship between dialectics and writing. Both of them are associated respectively to a serious activity (spoudé) and a game (paidiá). In our reading, we intend to show that it is not possible to subscribe to such association, considering, on the one hand, that the passage must be read as a kind of synthesis of a more comprehensive reflection (the determination of the philosophical lógos, i.e., dialectics) and, on the other hand, that it is possible to see in this context layers of meaning produced by an intertextual dialogue (the debate on writing between Alcidamas and Isocrate). In this sense, we propose an interpretation which takes into account an immanent analysis of the passage, showing that it does not display signifiers for subscribing the dichotomy between orality and writing, followed by a discussion that puts it back in the overall context of the dialogue, by analysing the philosophical meaning of the image of the “Garden of Adonis” and the opposition between paidiá and spoudé.O trecho entre 276b1 e 277b3 do diálogo Fedro tem sido usado como indício de uma dicotomia entre oralidade e escrita, que seria, por sua vez, signo de uma inconciliável relação entre a dialética e a escrita. Ambas são associadas, respectivamente, a uma atividade séria (spoudé) e a uma brincadeira ou jogo (paidiá). Em nossa leitura, pretendemos mostrar não ser possível subscrever tal associação, tendo em vista que, por um lado, a passagem deve ser lida como uma espécie de síntese de uma reflexão mais abrangente (a determinação do lógos filosófico, i.e., a dialética) e, por outro, que nela se entreveem camadas de significação produzidas pelo diálogo intertextual (o debate sobre a escrita encetado entre Alcidamante e Isócrates). Nesse sentido, propomos uma interpretação que leva em conta uma análise imanente da passagem, mostrando que ela carece dos significantes para uma dicotomia oralidade vs. escrita, seguida de uma reflexão que a repõe no enquadre do diálogo, ao analisarmos os sentidos filosóficos da imagem do “Jardim de Adônis” e da oposição entre paidiá e spoudé.Revista KriterionRevista KriterionKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaRevista Kriterion2021-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36072Revista Kriterion; Vol. 62 No. 150 (2021)Revista Kriterion; Vol. 62 Núm. 150 (2021)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 62 No 150 (2021)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 62 N. 150 (2021)Revista Kriterion; v. 62 n. 150 (2021)1981-53360100-512Xreponame:Kriterion (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36072/29081Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Kriterionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFortes, Fábio2021-12-07T20:11:25Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/36072Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterionPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/oairevistakriterion@gmail.com1981-53360100-512Xopendoar:2024-01-24T12:41:30.523240Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3) A IMAGEM DO “JARDIM DE ADÔNIS” E A REFLEXÃO SOBRE A ESCRITA COMO PARADIGMA PARA DETERMINAÇÃO DO LÓGOS NO FEDRO DE PLATÃO (276B1-277B3) |
title |
THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3) |
spellingShingle |
THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3) Fortes, Fábio Platão escrita oralidade dialética lógos Plato writing orality dialetics lógos |
title_short |
THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3) |
title_full |
THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3) |
title_fullStr |
THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3) |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3) |
title_sort |
THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3) |
author |
Fortes, Fábio |
author_facet |
Fortes, Fábio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fortes, Fábio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Platão escrita oralidade dialética lógos Plato writing orality dialetics lógos |
topic |
Platão escrita oralidade dialética lógos Plato writing orality dialetics lógos |
description |
The passage between 276b1 and 277b3 of the dialogue Phaedrus has been used to indicate a dichotomy between orality and writing, as a sign of an irreconcilable relationship between dialectics and writing. Both of them are associated respectively to a serious activity (spoudé) and a game (paidiá). In our reading, we intend to show that it is not possible to subscribe to such association, considering, on the one hand, that the passage must be read as a kind of synthesis of a more comprehensive reflection (the determination of the philosophical lógos, i.e., dialectics) and, on the other hand, that it is possible to see in this context layers of meaning produced by an intertextual dialogue (the debate on writing between Alcidamas and Isocrate). In this sense, we propose an interpretation which takes into account an immanent analysis of the passage, showing that it does not display signifiers for subscribing the dichotomy between orality and writing, followed by a discussion that puts it back in the overall context of the dialogue, by analysing the philosophical meaning of the image of the “Garden of Adonis” and the opposition between paidiá and spoudé. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36072 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36072 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36072/29081 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Kriterion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Kriterion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion Revista Kriterion Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Revista Kriterion |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion Revista Kriterion Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Revista Kriterion |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion; Vol. 62 No. 150 (2021) Revista Kriterion; Vol. 62 Núm. 150 (2021) Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 62 No 150 (2021) Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 62 N. 150 (2021) Revista Kriterion; v. 62 n. 150 (2021) 1981-5336 0100-512X reponame:Kriterion (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Kriterion (Online) |
collection |
Kriterion (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistakriterion@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799711183388803072 |