Metamorphoses of logos: from non-predicative to predicative

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, José Gabriel Trindade
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Archai (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/12796
Resumo: This paper deals with some philosophical uses of logos prominent in platonic dialogues, namely those associated to contrasting logical and-epistemological contexts. Contraposed to some non-predicative conceptions, the ‘predicative’ theory of logos (Sophist 261-264) culminates Plato’s research on the subject. In the “socratic” dialogues it focuses on the request to answer the “What is?” question with a logos, to which corresponds, in the Phaedo and the Republic, the logon didonai requirement as proof of knowledge. As examples of sophistic uses of logos it examines three infallibilist and non-referentialist conceptions of logos advanced in the Euthydemus, the Theaetetus and the Cratylus. Having analyzed three cases of non-predicative logos, the paper suggests that with the predicative theory of logos Plato aims at enabling discourse to get at the knowledge of “what is”.
id UNB-18_7dee0241afe596a7802af5f6a544bea5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12796
network_acronym_str UNB-18
network_name_str Revista Archai (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Metamorphoses of logos: from non-predicative to predicativeMetamorfoses do logos: do não-predicativo ao predicativoPlatãodiálogoslogospredicatividadenão-predicatividadePlatodialoguespredicativenon-predicative logosThis paper deals with some philosophical uses of logos prominent in platonic dialogues, namely those associated to contrasting logical and-epistemological contexts. Contraposed to some non-predicative conceptions, the ‘predicative’ theory of logos (Sophist 261-264) culminates Plato’s research on the subject. In the “socratic” dialogues it focuses on the request to answer the “What is?” question with a logos, to which corresponds, in the Phaedo and the Republic, the logon didonai requirement as proof of knowledge. As examples of sophistic uses of logos it examines three infallibilist and non-referentialist conceptions of logos advanced in the Euthydemus, the Theaetetus and the Cratylus. Having analyzed three cases of non-predicative logos, the paper suggests that with the predicative theory of logos Plato aims at enabling discourse to get at the knowledge of “what is”.Este texto aborda alguns usos filosóficos de logos em Platão, em especial os associados a contextos lógico-epistemológicos contrastantes. Contraposta a vagas concepções ‘não-predicativas’, a teoria ‘predicativa’ do enunciado (Sofista 261-264) culmina a pesquisa sobre o logos, desenvolvida nos diálogos. Da obra “socrática”, retira o pedido de resposta à pergunta “O que é?” por meio de um logos, correspondida, no Fédon e na República, pela exigência de logon didonai como prova do saber. Noutro plano, exemplificando usos sofísticos do logos, são expostas três concepções infalibilistas e não-referencialistas de logos, avançadas no Eutidemo, no Teeteto e no Crátilo. Depois de analisar três casos de logos não-predicativo, o texto defende que, com a teoria predicativa do logos, Platão visa a habilitar do discurso para o conhecimento de “o que é”.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2018-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/1279610.14195/1984-249X_24_6Revista Archai; No. 24 (2018): Archai Journal nº24 (September, 2018); 179Archai Journal; n. 24 (2018): Revista Archai nº24 (setembro, 2018); 1791984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_24reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/12796/11180Santos, José Gabriel Trindadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-08-19T15:34:21Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12796Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2019-08-19T15:34:21Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Metamorphoses of logos: from non-predicative to predicative
Metamorfoses do logos: do não-predicativo ao predicativo
title Metamorphoses of logos: from non-predicative to predicative
spellingShingle Metamorphoses of logos: from non-predicative to predicative
Santos, José Gabriel Trindade
Platão
diálogos
logos
predicatividade
não-predicatividade
Plato
dialogues
predicative
non-predicative logos
title_short Metamorphoses of logos: from non-predicative to predicative
title_full Metamorphoses of logos: from non-predicative to predicative
title_fullStr Metamorphoses of logos: from non-predicative to predicative
title_full_unstemmed Metamorphoses of logos: from non-predicative to predicative
title_sort Metamorphoses of logos: from non-predicative to predicative
author Santos, José Gabriel Trindade
author_facet Santos, José Gabriel Trindade
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, José Gabriel Trindade
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Platão
diálogos
logos
predicatividade
não-predicatividade
Plato
dialogues
predicative
non-predicative logos
topic Platão
diálogos
logos
predicatividade
não-predicatividade
Plato
dialogues
predicative
non-predicative logos
description This paper deals with some philosophical uses of logos prominent in platonic dialogues, namely those associated to contrasting logical and-epistemological contexts. Contraposed to some non-predicative conceptions, the ‘predicative’ theory of logos (Sophist 261-264) culminates Plato’s research on the subject. In the “socratic” dialogues it focuses on the request to answer the “What is?” question with a logos, to which corresponds, in the Phaedo and the Republic, the logon didonai requirement as proof of knowledge. As examples of sophistic uses of logos it examines three infallibilist and non-referentialist conceptions of logos advanced in the Euthydemus, the Theaetetus and the Cratylus. Having analyzed three cases of non-predicative logos, the paper suggests that with the predicative theory of logos Plato aims at enabling discourse to get at the knowledge of “what is”.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articles
Artigos
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/12796
10.14195/1984-249X_24_6
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/12796
identifier_str_mv 10.14195/1984-249X_24_6
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/12796/11180
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Archai; No. 24 (2018): Archai Journal nº24 (September, 2018); 179
Archai Journal; n. 24 (2018): Revista Archai nº24 (setembro, 2018); 179
1984-249X
2179-4960
10.14195/1984-249X_24
reponame:Revista Archai (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Revista Archai (Online)
collection Revista Archai (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br
_version_ 1798319945308700672

Registros relacionados