THE ARCHAISM OF SUBSTANTIALITY IN HEGEL’S DIFFERENCE WRITING

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Luiz Filipe da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2024
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Kriterion (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/39659
Resumo: The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that one of the reasonsfor Hegel’s failure in consummating the project of “construct the absolute forconsciousness” presented in 1801 in his Writing on Difference consisted in thepatent mismatch between the negativity to which the determinations of finitudewould be submitted and the conception of the absolute still substantially thought.Precisely, what we call here the archaism of substantiality would set the tone ofthis mismatch that still entailed the heterogeneity between finitude, with its wayof ascending to the absolute, and the absolute itself. Among other things, thiswill become clearer observing the formalism of the intuitionist proposal thatHegel presents at that time, aiming to safeguard the elevation of consciousnesswithout its intrinsic negativity tainting the absolutity of the principle to whichit was elevated.
id UFMG-10_d2bc6eb210413143fca4e890ce1b0956
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/39659
network_acronym_str UFMG-10
network_name_str Kriterion (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling THE ARCHAISM OF SUBSTANTIALITY IN HEGEL’S DIFFERENCE WRITINGO ARCAÍSMO DA SUBSTANCIALIDADE NO ESCRITO DA DIFERENÇA DE HEGELConsciênciaAbsolutoFinitudeSubstânciaHegelConsciousnessAbsoluteFinitudeSubstanceHegelThe aim of this paper is to demonstrate that one of the reasonsfor Hegel’s failure in consummating the project of “construct the absolute forconsciousness” presented in 1801 in his Writing on Difference consisted in thepatent mismatch between the negativity to which the determinations of finitudewould be submitted and the conception of the absolute still substantially thought.Precisely, what we call here the archaism of substantiality would set the tone ofthis mismatch that still entailed the heterogeneity between finitude, with its wayof ascending to the absolute, and the absolute itself. Among other things, thiswill become clearer observing the formalism of the intuitionist proposal thatHegel presents at that time, aiming to safeguard the elevation of consciousnesswithout its intrinsic negativity tainting the absolutity of the principle to whichit was elevated.O objetivo deste trabalho é demonstrar que uma das razõespara o fracasso de Hegel em consumar o projeto de “construir do absoluto paraa consciência” apresentado em 1801 em seu Escrito da Diferença consistia nodescompasso patente entre a negatividade que estaria submetida às determinaçõesda finitude e à concepção do absoluto pensado ainda substancialmente. Nessesentido, aquilo que chamamos aqui de arcaísmo da substancialidade dariao tom desse descompasso que acarretava ainda na heterogeneidade entre afinitude, com seu modo de ascender ao absoluto, e o absoluto mesmo. Entreoutras coisas, isso ficará mais claro observando o formalismo da propostaintuicionista que Hegel apresenta nessa época, visando salvaguardar a elevaçãoda consciência sem que, com isso, sua negatividade intrínseca manchasse aabsolutidade do princípio ao qual essa se elevava.Revista KriterionRevista KriterionKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaRevista Kriterion2024-02-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/39659Revista Kriterion; Vol. 65 No. 156 (2023)Revista Kriterion; Vol. 65 Núm. 156 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 65 No 156 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 65 N. 156 (2023)Revista Kriterion; v. 65 n. 156 (2023)1981-53360100-512Xreponame:Kriterion (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/39659/43314Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Kriterionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Luiz Filipe da Silva2024-02-14T15:55:45Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/39659Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterionPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/oairevistakriterion@gmail.com1981-53360100-512Xopendoar:2024-02-14T15:55:45Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE ARCHAISM OF SUBSTANTIALITY IN HEGEL’S DIFFERENCE WRITING
O ARCAÍSMO DA SUBSTANCIALIDADE NO ESCRITO DA DIFERENÇA DE HEGEL
title THE ARCHAISM OF SUBSTANTIALITY IN HEGEL’S DIFFERENCE WRITING
spellingShingle THE ARCHAISM OF SUBSTANTIALITY IN HEGEL’S DIFFERENCE WRITING
Oliveira, Luiz Filipe da Silva
Consciência
Absoluto
Finitude
Substância
Hegel
Consciousness
Absolute
Finitude
Substance
Hegel
title_short THE ARCHAISM OF SUBSTANTIALITY IN HEGEL’S DIFFERENCE WRITING
title_full THE ARCHAISM OF SUBSTANTIALITY IN HEGEL’S DIFFERENCE WRITING
title_fullStr THE ARCHAISM OF SUBSTANTIALITY IN HEGEL’S DIFFERENCE WRITING
title_full_unstemmed THE ARCHAISM OF SUBSTANTIALITY IN HEGEL’S DIFFERENCE WRITING
title_sort THE ARCHAISM OF SUBSTANTIALITY IN HEGEL’S DIFFERENCE WRITING
author Oliveira, Luiz Filipe da Silva
author_facet Oliveira, Luiz Filipe da Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Luiz Filipe da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Consciência
Absoluto
Finitude
Substância
Hegel
Consciousness
Absolute
Finitude
Substance
Hegel
topic Consciência
Absoluto
Finitude
Substância
Hegel
Consciousness
Absolute
Finitude
Substance
Hegel
description The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that one of the reasonsfor Hegel’s failure in consummating the project of “construct the absolute forconsciousness” presented in 1801 in his Writing on Difference consisted in thepatent mismatch between the negativity to which the determinations of finitudewould be submitted and the conception of the absolute still substantially thought.Precisely, what we call here the archaism of substantiality would set the tone ofthis mismatch that still entailed the heterogeneity between finitude, with its wayof ascending to the absolute, and the absolute itself. Among other things, thiswill become clearer observing the formalism of the intuitionist proposal thatHegel presents at that time, aiming to safeguard the elevation of consciousnesswithout its intrinsic negativity tainting the absolutity of the principle to whichit was elevated.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-02-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/39659
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/39659
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/39659/43314
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Kriterion
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Kriterion
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion; Vol. 65 No. 156 (2023)
Revista Kriterion; Vol. 65 Núm. 156 (2023)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 65 No 156 (2023)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 65 N. 156 (2023)
Revista Kriterion; v. 65 n. 156 (2023)
1981-5336
0100-512X
reponame:Kriterion (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Kriterion (Online)
collection Kriterion (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistakriterion@gmail.com
_version_ 1799711182969372672