Reason against history: presuppositions of Contractarian Natural Law in the Modern Period

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Castro, Alexander
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
Texto Completo: https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/652
Resumo: The political and legal philosophy of early modern period was dominated by contractarian natural law theory, which in its most relevant philosophical forms implied the abandonment of some dominant ideas in the medieval Aristotelianism. In this paradigm shift, not only the content of the ideas, but also the methods applied in the political thinking have played an important role. We analyze some questions concerning the nature of contractarian political thought in its relation to the philosophical and scientific culture that emerged with the Renaissance and try to explain the nature of some of its limitations, as well as the reasons of its decline in the early 19th Century, during the emergence of political and legal historicism. The method we chose is the comparison of the contractarian natural law theory to the currents of thought it confronted and was confronted by, in order to highlight some of its characteristics that were neglected by other commentators. In so doing, we intend to contribute to deepen the understanding of this current of philosophical-political-legal thought that informed the first declarations of human rights, the first constitutionalism and, later and indirectly, also private law through the doctrine of personality rights.
id UFMG-21_1e3619a23449e70eeed3722fc2b1ef7a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/652
network_acronym_str UFMG-21
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Reason against history: presuppositions of Contractarian Natural Law in the Modern PeriodA razão contra a História: pressupostos do Direito Natural Contratualista na ModernidadeThe political and legal philosophy of early modern period was dominated by contractarian natural law theory, which in its most relevant philosophical forms implied the abandonment of some dominant ideas in the medieval Aristotelianism. In this paradigm shift, not only the content of the ideas, but also the methods applied in the political thinking have played an important role. We analyze some questions concerning the nature of contractarian political thought in its relation to the philosophical and scientific culture that emerged with the Renaissance and try to explain the nature of some of its limitations, as well as the reasons of its decline in the early 19th Century, during the emergence of political and legal historicism. The method we chose is the comparison of the contractarian natural law theory to the currents of thought it confronted and was confronted by, in order to highlight some of its characteristics that were neglected by other commentators. In so doing, we intend to contribute to deepen the understanding of this current of philosophical-political-legal thought that informed the first declarations of human rights, the first constitutionalism and, later and indirectly, also private law through the doctrine of personality rights.CONTEXTO: O pensamento filosófico político e jurídico da primeira modernidade foi  dominado pela teoria do direito natural contratualista, que veio a exercer significativa  influência sobre as doutrinas jurídicas propriamente ditas, em especial sobre as  declarações de direitos e sobre o nascente constitucionalismo, durante o ocaso do antigo  regime. O impacto da doutrina do direito natural sobre aspectos do direito positivo  continuaram a aflorar mesmo após os momentos fundacionais do direito ocidental  moderno. Ela manifesta-se nas entrelinhas de outras tendências do direito, como a  ascensão dos direitos da personalidade no segundo pós-guerra. Logo, a ideia de direitos  que emanam diretamente da condição de pessoa humana ecoa esquemas de pensamento e  de compreensão do fenômeno jurídico inaugurados pelas escolas do direito natural. OBJETIVO: Almejamos discutir alguns aspectos das condicionantes do contratualismo  históricas de forma a contribuir para o desenvolvimento de uma história das ideias  políticas e jurídicas atenta não apenas à sua lógica interna, mas sobretudo aos complexos  mecanismos pelos quais ela se relaciona com o mundo dos interesses materiais e dos  conflitos políticos e sociais concretos. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: análise qualitativa de conteúdo comparativa entre a  literatura do direito natural e as correntes de pensamento contra as quais o direito natural  contratualista se confrontou e foi confrontado. RESULTADOS: A interpretação filosófica dos desafios que a sociedade tinha diante de  si dependia das características que a própria racionalidade moderna havia adquirido com  o declínio da escolástica. Alguns autores buscam inspiração na matemática para inaugurar  um tipo de argumentação que parte exclusivamente da perspectiva do indivíduo e deduz,  formas de estado e governo como necessidade racional inscrita na psicologia humana.  CONCLUSÕES: Essa abordagem fazia tábula rasa da história, pondo de lado o conjunto  de vínculos sociais aos quais os indivíduos estão submetidos a despeito de sua vontade,  em favor da construção de um modelo abstrato e trans-histórico de ser humano, sob o qual  se erguerá um modelo também abstrato e pretensamente universal de direito e de estado. Apenas com o historicismo aquelas condicionantes da interação social voltariam a ser  tematizadas, aposentando assim o modelo do contrato social e suas abstrações  generalizantes para concentra-se sobre aquilo que se mostrava refratário ao racionalismo  lógico-formal cartesiano dos modernos filósofos.RBEP2021-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/65210.9732/2021.v123.652Brazilian Journal of Political Studies; Vol. 123 (2021): RBEP 123; 15-48Revista Brasileña de Estudios Políticos; Vol. 123 (2021): RBEP 123; 15-48Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos; v. 123 (2021): RBEP 123; 15-482359-57360034-7191reponame:Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/652/632Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Castro, Alexander2021-12-31T20:28:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/652Revistahttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/indexONGhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/oairbep.ufmg@gmail.com || ati@direito.ufmg.br2359-57360034-7191opendoar:2021-12-31T20:28:26Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reason against history: presuppositions of Contractarian Natural Law in the Modern Period
A razão contra a História: pressupostos do Direito Natural Contratualista na Modernidade
title Reason against history: presuppositions of Contractarian Natural Law in the Modern Period
spellingShingle Reason against history: presuppositions of Contractarian Natural Law in the Modern Period
de Castro, Alexander
title_short Reason against history: presuppositions of Contractarian Natural Law in the Modern Period
title_full Reason against history: presuppositions of Contractarian Natural Law in the Modern Period
title_fullStr Reason against history: presuppositions of Contractarian Natural Law in the Modern Period
title_full_unstemmed Reason against history: presuppositions of Contractarian Natural Law in the Modern Period
title_sort Reason against history: presuppositions of Contractarian Natural Law in the Modern Period
author de Castro, Alexander
author_facet de Castro, Alexander
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Castro, Alexander
description The political and legal philosophy of early modern period was dominated by contractarian natural law theory, which in its most relevant philosophical forms implied the abandonment of some dominant ideas in the medieval Aristotelianism. In this paradigm shift, not only the content of the ideas, but also the methods applied in the political thinking have played an important role. We analyze some questions concerning the nature of contractarian political thought in its relation to the philosophical and scientific culture that emerged with the Renaissance and try to explain the nature of some of its limitations, as well as the reasons of its decline in the early 19th Century, during the emergence of political and legal historicism. The method we chose is the comparison of the contractarian natural law theory to the currents of thought it confronted and was confronted by, in order to highlight some of its characteristics that were neglected by other commentators. In so doing, we intend to contribute to deepen the understanding of this current of philosophical-political-legal thought that informed the first declarations of human rights, the first constitutionalism and, later and indirectly, also private law through the doctrine of personality rights.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/652
10.9732/2021.v123.652
url https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/652
identifier_str_mv 10.9732/2021.v123.652
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/652/632
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv RBEP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv RBEP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Political Studies; Vol. 123 (2021): RBEP 123; 15-48
Revista Brasileña de Estudios Políticos; Vol. 123 (2021): RBEP 123; 15-48
Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos; v. 123 (2021): RBEP 123; 15-48
2359-5736
0034-7191
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbep.ufmg@gmail.com || ati@direito.ufmg.br
_version_ 1798042218793009152