Frege on the Ontological Presuppositions of Scientific Discourse
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Princípios (Natal. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/29584 |
Resumo: | According to the standard conception of ontological commitment, which goes back to Quine, we are ontologically committed to acknowledge those and only those entities whose existence is a condition for the truth of our theories. Frege has sketched, in the context of his critique of the idealist interpretation of scientific language, a more complete approach according to which we are committed to accept also those entities whose existence is a condition for successful communication in science. He argued that we must acknowledge a Platonic realm of objective senses because the existence of such entities is a condition for communicating non-trivial scientific discoveries. The aim of this paper is to reconstruct and defend Frege’s approach. The main thesis defended is that, although Frege’s analysis of ontological commitment is largely obsolete, his general approach to derive our ontological commitments from both the truth and the success conditions of scientific discourse is correct. |
id |
UFRN-5_2ee2d882f3c9c42b5c7eee1913e7c4fc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/29584 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRN-5 |
network_name_str |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Frege on the Ontological Presuppositions of Scientific DiscourseOntological commitmentFregeScientific DiscourseAccording to the standard conception of ontological commitment, which goes back to Quine, we are ontologically committed to acknowledge those and only those entities whose existence is a condition for the truth of our theories. Frege has sketched, in the context of his critique of the idealist interpretation of scientific language, a more complete approach according to which we are committed to accept also those entities whose existence is a condition for successful communication in science. He argued that we must acknowledge a Platonic realm of objective senses because the existence of such entities is a condition for communicating non-trivial scientific discoveries. The aim of this paper is to reconstruct and defend Frege’s approach. The main thesis defended is that, although Frege’s analysis of ontological commitment is largely obsolete, his general approach to derive our ontological commitments from both the truth and the success conditions of scientific discourse is correct.EDUFRN2022-08-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/2958410.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n59ID29584Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 29 n. 59 (2022): Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); 92-1101983-21090104-869410.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n59reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/29584/15989Copyright (c) 2022 Dirk Greimannhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGreimann, Dirk2022-08-04T23:01:47Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/29584Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principiosPUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/oai||principios@cchla.ufrn.br1983-21090104-8694opendoar:2022-08-04T23:01:47Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Frege on the Ontological Presuppositions of Scientific Discourse |
title |
Frege on the Ontological Presuppositions of Scientific Discourse |
spellingShingle |
Frege on the Ontological Presuppositions of Scientific Discourse Greimann, Dirk Ontological commitment Frege Scientific Discourse |
title_short |
Frege on the Ontological Presuppositions of Scientific Discourse |
title_full |
Frege on the Ontological Presuppositions of Scientific Discourse |
title_fullStr |
Frege on the Ontological Presuppositions of Scientific Discourse |
title_full_unstemmed |
Frege on the Ontological Presuppositions of Scientific Discourse |
title_sort |
Frege on the Ontological Presuppositions of Scientific Discourse |
author |
Greimann, Dirk |
author_facet |
Greimann, Dirk |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Greimann, Dirk |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ontological commitment Frege Scientific Discourse |
topic |
Ontological commitment Frege Scientific Discourse |
description |
According to the standard conception of ontological commitment, which goes back to Quine, we are ontologically committed to acknowledge those and only those entities whose existence is a condition for the truth of our theories. Frege has sketched, in the context of his critique of the idealist interpretation of scientific language, a more complete approach according to which we are committed to accept also those entities whose existence is a condition for successful communication in science. He argued that we must acknowledge a Platonic realm of objective senses because the existence of such entities is a condition for communicating non-trivial scientific discoveries. The aim of this paper is to reconstruct and defend Frege’s approach. The main thesis defended is that, although Frege’s analysis of ontological commitment is largely obsolete, his general approach to derive our ontological commitments from both the truth and the success conditions of scientific discourse is correct. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/29584 10.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n59ID29584 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/29584 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n59ID29584 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/29584/15989 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Dirk Greimann http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Dirk Greimann http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFRN |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFRN |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 29 n. 59 (2022): Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); 92-110 1983-2109 0104-8694 10.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n59 reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) instacron:UFRN |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
instacron_str |
UFRN |
institution |
UFRN |
reponame_str |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
collection |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||principios@cchla.ufrn.br |
_version_ |
1799769976690704384 |