Popper’s and Berlin’s challenge to cultural relativism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Grubba, Leilane Serratine
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ramos, Renata Rodrigues
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
Texto Completo: https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/694
Resumo: PROBLEM: The problematic of this article covers the theoretical position of Karl R. Popper and Isaiah Berlin on the thesis of cultural relativism. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to present Karl Popper's and Isaiah Berlin's counterpoints to the cultural relativism thesis, mainly by examining the texts The Myth of Context and The Search for the Ideal. METHODOLOGY: Using the deductive method, first Popper's theoretical position on the thesis of cultural relativism will be analyzed. After that, Berlin's theoretical position will be analyzed. Finally, both positions will be analyzed in exemplary cases. RESULT: The analysis carried out allows us to criticize the thesis of cultural relativism, according to which any rational discussion is only possible with the sharing of common contexts. It advances by proposing the need for confrontation between different cultures and contexts and the use of methodological pluralism in the critique of relativism. CONCLUSIONS: As a conclusion of the paper, according to relativism, rational discussion would only be possible if individuals shared common contexts, including cultural ones. Popper, on the contrary, affirms that our civilization comes precisely from the confrontation of different cultures and, consequently, from the confrontation of different contexts. In the same vein, Isaiah Berlin suggests "methodological pluralism" in the struggle against relativism; collisions, for him, are part of the essence of values. Berlin advises to criticize those who suggest that these contradictions will be resolved in some perfect world. 
id UFMG-21_cb644594578e3a757e512e63a650ddbb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/694
network_acronym_str UFMG-21
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Popper’s and Berlin’s challenge to cultural relativismLa objeción de Popper y Berlin a la tesis del relativismo culturalA objeção de Popper e Berlin à tese do relativismo culturalDignidadeKarl PopperIsaiah BerlinRelativismo culturalMisoginiaDignityKarl PopperIsaiah BerlinCultural relativismMisogynyDignidadKarl PopperIsaiah Berlinrelativismo cultural y misoginiaPROBLEM: The problematic of this article covers the theoretical position of Karl R. Popper and Isaiah Berlin on the thesis of cultural relativism. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to present Karl Popper's and Isaiah Berlin's counterpoints to the cultural relativism thesis, mainly by examining the texts The Myth of Context and The Search for the Ideal. METHODOLOGY: Using the deductive method, first Popper's theoretical position on the thesis of cultural relativism will be analyzed. After that, Berlin's theoretical position will be analyzed. Finally, both positions will be analyzed in exemplary cases. RESULT: The analysis carried out allows us to criticize the thesis of cultural relativism, according to which any rational discussion is only possible with the sharing of common contexts. It advances by proposing the need for confrontation between different cultures and contexts and the use of methodological pluralism in the critique of relativism. CONCLUSIONS: As a conclusion of the paper, according to relativism, rational discussion would only be possible if individuals shared common contexts, including cultural ones. Popper, on the contrary, affirms that our civilization comes precisely from the confrontation of different cultures and, consequently, from the confrontation of different contexts. In the same vein, Isaiah Berlin suggests "methodological pluralism" in the struggle against relativism; collisions, for him, are part of the essence of values. Berlin advises to criticize those who suggest that these contradictions will be resolved in some perfect world. PROBLEMA: La problemática de este artículo abarca la posición teórica de Karl R. Popper e Isaiah Berlin sobre la tesis del relativismo cultural. OBJETIVOS: Este estudio pretende presentar los contrapuntos de Karl Popper e Isaiah Berlin a la tesis del relativismo cultural, principalmente a partir del examen de los textos El mito del contexto y La búsqueda del ideal. METODOLOGÍA: Utilizando el método deductivo, en primer lugar, se analizará la posición teórica de Popper sobre la tesis del relativismo cultural. En consecuencia, la posición teórica de Berlín. Por último, se analizarán ambas posturas en casos ejemplares. RESULTADO: El análisis realizado permite criticar la tesis del relativismo cultural, según la cual toda discusión racional sólo es posible si se comparten contextos comunes. Avanza proponiendo la necesidad de confrontación entre diferentes culturas y contextos y el uso del pluralismo metodológico en la crítica del relativismo. CONCLUSIONES: Como conclusión del trabajo, según el relativismo, la discusión racional sólo sería posible si los individuos compartieran contextos comunes, incluidos los culturales. Popper, por el contrario, afirma que nuestra civilización proviene precisamente de la confrontación de diferentes culturas y, en consecuencia, de la confrontación de diferentes contextos. En la misma línea, Isaiah Berlin sugiere el "pluralismo metodológico" en la lucha contra el relativismo; las colisiones, para él, forman parte de la esencia de los valores. Berlín aconseja criticar a quienes sugieren que estas contradicciones se resolverán en algún mundo perfecto. PROBLEMÁTICA: A problemática do presente artigo abrange a posição teórica de Karl R. Popper e de Isaiah Berlin sobre a tese do relativismo cultural. OBJETIVOS: O presente estudo objetiva apresentar os contrapontos de Karl Popper e de Isaiah Berlin à tese do relativismo cultural, principalmente a partir do exame dos textos O Mito do Contexto e a A Busca do Ideal. METODOLOGIA: A partir do método dedutivo, em primeiro lugar, será analisada a posição teórica de Popper sobre a tese do relativismo cultural. Sequencialmente, a posição teórica de Berlin. Por fim, serão analisadas ambas as posições em casos exemplificativos. RESULTADO: A análise efetuada permite a crítica à tese do relativismo cultural, segundo a qual qualquer discussão racional somente é possível com a partilha de contextos comuns. Avança ao propor a necessidade de confronto entre diferentes culturas e contextos e o uso do pluralismo metodológico na crítica ao relativismo. CONCLUSÕES: Como conclusão do trabalho, de acordo com o relativismo, a discussão racional somente seria possível caso os indivíduos partilhassem contextos comuns, inclusive culturais. Popper, ao contrário, afirma que nossa civilização advém justamente do confronto de diferentes culturas e, por conseguinte, do confronto de diferentes contextos. No mesmo sentido, Isaiah Berlin sugere o “pluralismo metodológico” no embate ao relativismo; as colisões, para ele, fazem parte da essência dos valores. Berlin aconselha a criticar aqueles que sugerem que essas contradições serão resolvidas em algum mundo perfeito. RBEP2021-07-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/69410.9732/2021.v122.694Brazilian Journal of Political Studies; Vol. 122 (2021): RBEP 122; 405-446Revista Brasileña de Estudios Políticos; Vol. 122 (2021): RBEP 122; 405-446Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos; v. 122 (2021): RBEP 122; 405-4462359-57360034-7191reponame:Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/694/610Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGrubba, Leilane SerratineRamos, Renata Rodrigues2021-07-13T16:22:33Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/694Revistahttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/indexONGhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/oairbep.ufmg@gmail.com || ati@direito.ufmg.br2359-57360034-7191opendoar:2021-07-13T16:22:33Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Popper’s and Berlin’s challenge to cultural relativism
La objeción de Popper y Berlin a la tesis del relativismo cultural
A objeção de Popper e Berlin à tese do relativismo cultural
title Popper’s and Berlin’s challenge to cultural relativism
spellingShingle Popper’s and Berlin’s challenge to cultural relativism
Grubba, Leilane Serratine
Dignidade
Karl Popper
Isaiah Berlin
Relativismo cultural
Misoginia
Dignity
Karl Popper
Isaiah Berlin
Cultural relativism
Misogyny
Dignidad
Karl Popper
Isaiah Berlin
relativismo cultural y misoginia
title_short Popper’s and Berlin’s challenge to cultural relativism
title_full Popper’s and Berlin’s challenge to cultural relativism
title_fullStr Popper’s and Berlin’s challenge to cultural relativism
title_full_unstemmed Popper’s and Berlin’s challenge to cultural relativism
title_sort Popper’s and Berlin’s challenge to cultural relativism
author Grubba, Leilane Serratine
author_facet Grubba, Leilane Serratine
Ramos, Renata Rodrigues
author_role author
author2 Ramos, Renata Rodrigues
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Grubba, Leilane Serratine
Ramos, Renata Rodrigues
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dignidade
Karl Popper
Isaiah Berlin
Relativismo cultural
Misoginia
Dignity
Karl Popper
Isaiah Berlin
Cultural relativism
Misogyny
Dignidad
Karl Popper
Isaiah Berlin
relativismo cultural y misoginia
topic Dignidade
Karl Popper
Isaiah Berlin
Relativismo cultural
Misoginia
Dignity
Karl Popper
Isaiah Berlin
Cultural relativism
Misogyny
Dignidad
Karl Popper
Isaiah Berlin
relativismo cultural y misoginia
description PROBLEM: The problematic of this article covers the theoretical position of Karl R. Popper and Isaiah Berlin on the thesis of cultural relativism. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to present Karl Popper's and Isaiah Berlin's counterpoints to the cultural relativism thesis, mainly by examining the texts The Myth of Context and The Search for the Ideal. METHODOLOGY: Using the deductive method, first Popper's theoretical position on the thesis of cultural relativism will be analyzed. After that, Berlin's theoretical position will be analyzed. Finally, both positions will be analyzed in exemplary cases. RESULT: The analysis carried out allows us to criticize the thesis of cultural relativism, according to which any rational discussion is only possible with the sharing of common contexts. It advances by proposing the need for confrontation between different cultures and contexts and the use of methodological pluralism in the critique of relativism. CONCLUSIONS: As a conclusion of the paper, according to relativism, rational discussion would only be possible if individuals shared common contexts, including cultural ones. Popper, on the contrary, affirms that our civilization comes precisely from the confrontation of different cultures and, consequently, from the confrontation of different contexts. In the same vein, Isaiah Berlin suggests "methodological pluralism" in the struggle against relativism; collisions, for him, are part of the essence of values. Berlin advises to criticize those who suggest that these contradictions will be resolved in some perfect world. 
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/694
10.9732/2021.v122.694
url https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/694
identifier_str_mv 10.9732/2021.v122.694
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/694/610
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv RBEP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv RBEP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Political Studies; Vol. 122 (2021): RBEP 122; 405-446
Revista Brasileña de Estudios Políticos; Vol. 122 (2021): RBEP 122; 405-446
Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos; v. 122 (2021): RBEP 122; 405-446
2359-5736
0034-7191
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbep.ufmg@gmail.com || ati@direito.ufmg.br
_version_ 1798042218821320704