The National Exam of Students’ Performance: teachers’ appreciation on the evaluation method

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ott, Joice Nedel
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Costa, Bartira Ercília Pinheiro da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Docência do Ensino Superior (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/article/view/2506
Resumo: The National Exam of Students' Performance (ENADE) is part of the National System for the Evaluation of Higher Education (SINAES), assessing the students' performance following the National Curricular Guidelines. The objective of this study was to analyze the opinion of professors of Pharmacy courses from public and private institutions of the state of Rio Grande do Sul in relation to ENADE. Through the Qualtrics system, 168 professors participated in the questionnaires, with a return submitted to the Discursive Textual Analysis. The answers revealed that 28,6% of them (48/168) presented favorable opinion to the evaluation method; 45.2% (76/168), moderate opinion; 14.3% (24/168), indifferent opinion; and 11,9% (20/168), unfavorable opinion. Furthermore, 22% (37/168) of the professors mentioned the assessment approach that focuses on the student. The opinion of those involved and the constant monitoring are crucial to recognize the exam’s limitations as well as the importance of ENADE as an instrument for measuring student performance, so that it becomes effectively useful in the qualification of higher education, complementing the SINAES proposal.
id UFMG-24_b2323c4d45986c87cc90a7230ce430b9
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/2506
network_acronym_str UFMG-24
network_name_str Revista Docência do Ensino Superior (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The National Exam of Students’ Performance: teachers’ appreciation on the evaluation methodExamen Nacional de Desempeño de Estudiantes: apreciación docente sobre el método evalutivoExame Nacional de Desempenho de Estudantes: apreciação docente sobre o método avaliativoEducaçãoAvaliaçãoDocentesSaúdeFarmácia.EducationEvaluationTeachersHealthPharmacyEducaciónEvaluaciónProfesoresSaludFarmaciaThe National Exam of Students' Performance (ENADE) is part of the National System for the Evaluation of Higher Education (SINAES), assessing the students' performance following the National Curricular Guidelines. The objective of this study was to analyze the opinion of professors of Pharmacy courses from public and private institutions of the state of Rio Grande do Sul in relation to ENADE. Through the Qualtrics system, 168 professors participated in the questionnaires, with a return submitted to the Discursive Textual Analysis. The answers revealed that 28,6% of them (48/168) presented favorable opinion to the evaluation method; 45.2% (76/168), moderate opinion; 14.3% (24/168), indifferent opinion; and 11,9% (20/168), unfavorable opinion. Furthermore, 22% (37/168) of the professors mentioned the assessment approach that focuses on the student. The opinion of those involved and the constant monitoring are crucial to recognize the exam’s limitations as well as the importance of ENADE as an instrument for measuring student performance, so that it becomes effectively useful in the qualification of higher education, complementing the SINAES proposal.El Examen Nacional de Desempeño de Estudiantes (ENADE) integra el Sistema Nacional de Evaluación de la Educación Superior (SINAES) evaluando el rendimiento de los alumnos según las Directrices Curriculares Nacionales. El objetivo de este trabajo fue analizar la opinión de profesores de los cursos de Farmacia de instituciones públicas y privadas del estado del Rio Grande do Sul con relación al ENADE. A través del sistema Qualtrics, 168 docentes participaron de los cuestionarios, con retorno sometido al Análisis Textual Discursivo. Las respuestas revelaron el 28,6% de los profesores (48/168) con opinión favorable al método de evaluación; el 45,2% (76/168) con opinión moderada; el 14,3% (24/168) con opinión indiferente y el 11,9% (20/168) con opinión desfavorable. 22% (37/168) de los profesores mencionaron le abordaje de evaluación en que el aluno es el foco.  La opinión de los involucrados y el constante monitoreo son cruciales para reconocer las limitaciones y la importancia del ENADE como instrumento de evaluación del desempeño estudiantil, para que este resulte efectivamente útil en la calificación de la educación superior, complementando la propuesta del SINAES.O Exame Nacional de Desempenho de Estudantes (ENADE) integra o Sistema Nacional de Avaliação da Educação Superior (SINAES) aferindo o rendimento dos alunos quanto às Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais. O objetivo deste trabalho foi analisar a opinião de professores dos Cursos de Farmácia de Instituições públicas e privadas do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, em relação ao ENADE. Através do sistema Qualtrics, 168 docentes participaram dos questionários, com retorno submetido à Análise Textual Discursiva. As respostas revelaram que 28% dos professores (47/168) apresentam opinião favorável ao método avaliativo; 45,2% (76/168) opinião moderada; 14,3% (24/168) indiferente e 12,5% (21/168) desfavorável, cuja abordagem, principal, ao aluno, mencionada por 22% (37/168) dos professores. Considerando que o sistema está em construção e assim deve permanecer para manter-se atual através dos tempos, a opinião dos envolvidos e constante monitoramento é crucial para que o instrumento de aferição efetivamente promova a qualificação constante da educação superior.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais2019-05-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/article/view/250610.35699/2237-5864.2019.2506Revista Docência do Ensino Superior; Vol. 9 (2019); 1-15Revista Docência do Ensino Superior; Vol. 9 (2019); 1-15Revista Docência do Ensino Superior; v. 9 (2019); 1-152237-58642358-6338reponame:Revista Docência do Ensino Superior (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/article/view/2506/9960Copyright (c) 2019 Joice Nedel Ott, Bartira Ercília Pinheiro da Costainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOtt, Joice NedelCosta, Bartira Ercília Pinheiro da2020-05-19T18:02:43Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/2506Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/oairevistadocenciaensinosuperior@ufmg.br||2237-58642237-5864opendoar:2020-05-19T18:02:43Revista Docência do Ensino Superior (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The National Exam of Students’ Performance: teachers’ appreciation on the evaluation method
Examen Nacional de Desempeño de Estudiantes: apreciación docente sobre el método evalutivo
Exame Nacional de Desempenho de Estudantes: apreciação docente sobre o método avaliativo
title The National Exam of Students’ Performance: teachers’ appreciation on the evaluation method
spellingShingle The National Exam of Students’ Performance: teachers’ appreciation on the evaluation method
Ott, Joice Nedel
Educação
Avaliação
Docentes
Saúde
Farmácia.
Education
Evaluation
Teachers
Health
Pharmacy
Educación
Evaluación
Profesores
Salud
Farmacia
title_short The National Exam of Students’ Performance: teachers’ appreciation on the evaluation method
title_full The National Exam of Students’ Performance: teachers’ appreciation on the evaluation method
title_fullStr The National Exam of Students’ Performance: teachers’ appreciation on the evaluation method
title_full_unstemmed The National Exam of Students’ Performance: teachers’ appreciation on the evaluation method
title_sort The National Exam of Students’ Performance: teachers’ appreciation on the evaluation method
author Ott, Joice Nedel
author_facet Ott, Joice Nedel
Costa, Bartira Ercília Pinheiro da
author_role author
author2 Costa, Bartira Ercília Pinheiro da
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ott, Joice Nedel
Costa, Bartira Ercília Pinheiro da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Educação
Avaliação
Docentes
Saúde
Farmácia.
Education
Evaluation
Teachers
Health
Pharmacy
Educación
Evaluación
Profesores
Salud
Farmacia
topic Educação
Avaliação
Docentes
Saúde
Farmácia.
Education
Evaluation
Teachers
Health
Pharmacy
Educación
Evaluación
Profesores
Salud
Farmacia
description The National Exam of Students' Performance (ENADE) is part of the National System for the Evaluation of Higher Education (SINAES), assessing the students' performance following the National Curricular Guidelines. The objective of this study was to analyze the opinion of professors of Pharmacy courses from public and private institutions of the state of Rio Grande do Sul in relation to ENADE. Through the Qualtrics system, 168 professors participated in the questionnaires, with a return submitted to the Discursive Textual Analysis. The answers revealed that 28,6% of them (48/168) presented favorable opinion to the evaluation method; 45.2% (76/168), moderate opinion; 14.3% (24/168), indifferent opinion; and 11,9% (20/168), unfavorable opinion. Furthermore, 22% (37/168) of the professors mentioned the assessment approach that focuses on the student. The opinion of those involved and the constant monitoring are crucial to recognize the exam’s limitations as well as the importance of ENADE as an instrument for measuring student performance, so that it becomes effectively useful in the qualification of higher education, complementing the SINAES proposal.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/article/view/2506
10.35699/2237-5864.2019.2506
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/article/view/2506
identifier_str_mv 10.35699/2237-5864.2019.2506
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/article/view/2506/9960
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Joice Nedel Ott, Bartira Ercília Pinheiro da Costa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Joice Nedel Ott, Bartira Ercília Pinheiro da Costa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Docência do Ensino Superior; Vol. 9 (2019); 1-15
Revista Docência do Ensino Superior; Vol. 9 (2019); 1-15
Revista Docência do Ensino Superior; v. 9 (2019); 1-15
2237-5864
2358-6338
reponame:Revista Docência do Ensino Superior (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Revista Docência do Ensino Superior (Online)
collection Revista Docência do Ensino Superior (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Docência do Ensino Superior (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadocenciaensinosuperior@ufmg.br||
_version_ 1797174637404094464

Registros relacionados