Writing, Acting and Engaging in Socioscientific Controversies as a Way to Learn about the Nature of Sciences

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Bernardo J.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Fonseca, Marina A., Segantini, Verona Campos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Transversal (Belo Horizonte)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/15044
Resumo: This article presents a methodology to teach about the nature of sciences and their histories through the construction of controversial dialogs in order to promote reflective and engaging practices among undergraduate and graduate students.  This proposal seeks to establish the study’s guidelines and organize the distribution of tasks in groups to draft scripts of dialogs that bring relevant information and that produce antagonistic positions on controversial socioscientific issues. This information will later be recorded in short home videos of 5 to 10 minutes each, which will then be shown and discussed in the classroom. Finally, this article highlights some limitations of this methodology, primarily in the way it has been used in this study. By contrast, the advantages of its use are pinpointed as a didactic strategy that serves to stimulate historical research and critical thinking regarding the nature of science and its sociotechnical relations. 
id UFMG-26_03338cc2b094f75ba7cb9722e9b2328a
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/15044
network_acronym_str UFMG-26
network_name_str Transversal (Belo Horizonte)
repository_id_str
spelling Writing, Acting and Engaging in Socioscientific Controversies as a Way to Learn about the Nature of SciencesHistorical ControversiesVideo ProductionArgumentationHistory and Philosophy of ScienceTeaching SciencesThis article presents a methodology to teach about the nature of sciences and their histories through the construction of controversial dialogs in order to promote reflective and engaging practices among undergraduate and graduate students.  This proposal seeks to establish the study’s guidelines and organize the distribution of tasks in groups to draft scripts of dialogs that bring relevant information and that produce antagonistic positions on controversial socioscientific issues. This information will later be recorded in short home videos of 5 to 10 minutes each, which will then be shown and discussed in the classroom. Finally, this article highlights some limitations of this methodology, primarily in the way it has been used in this study. By contrast, the advantages of its use are pinpointed as a didactic strategy that serves to stimulate historical research and critical thinking regarding the nature of science and its sociotechnical relations. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais2018-12-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/1504410.24117/2526-2270.2018.i5.11Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; No. 5 (2018): Dossier IDTC Special Issue | Methods and Cognitive Modelling in the History and Philosophy of Science–&–EducationTransversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; Núm. 5 (2018): Dossier IDTC Special Issue | Methods and Cognitive Modelling in the History and Philosophy of Science–&–EducationTransversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; No 5 (2018): Dossier IDTC Special Issue | Methods and Cognitive Modelling in the History and Philosophy of Science–&–EducationTransversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; n. 5 (2018): Dossier IDTC Special Issue | Methods and Cognitive Modelling in the History and Philosophy of Science–&–Education2526-2270reponame:Transversal (Belo Horizonte)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGenghttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/15044/12004Copyright (c) 2018 Bernardo J. Oliveira, Marina A. Fonseca, Verona Campos Segantinihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Bernardo J.Fonseca, Marina A.Segantini, Verona Campos2021-07-26T19:45:59Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/15044Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/oaimauroconde@ufmg.br2526-22702526-2270opendoar:2021-07-26T19:45:59Transversal (Belo Horizonte) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Writing, Acting and Engaging in Socioscientific Controversies as a Way to Learn about the Nature of Sciences
title Writing, Acting and Engaging in Socioscientific Controversies as a Way to Learn about the Nature of Sciences
spellingShingle Writing, Acting and Engaging in Socioscientific Controversies as a Way to Learn about the Nature of Sciences
Oliveira, Bernardo J.
Historical Controversies
Video Production
Argumentation
History and Philosophy of Science
Teaching Sciences
title_short Writing, Acting and Engaging in Socioscientific Controversies as a Way to Learn about the Nature of Sciences
title_full Writing, Acting and Engaging in Socioscientific Controversies as a Way to Learn about the Nature of Sciences
title_fullStr Writing, Acting and Engaging in Socioscientific Controversies as a Way to Learn about the Nature of Sciences
title_full_unstemmed Writing, Acting and Engaging in Socioscientific Controversies as a Way to Learn about the Nature of Sciences
title_sort Writing, Acting and Engaging in Socioscientific Controversies as a Way to Learn about the Nature of Sciences
author Oliveira, Bernardo J.
author_facet Oliveira, Bernardo J.
Fonseca, Marina A.
Segantini, Verona Campos
author_role author
author2 Fonseca, Marina A.
Segantini, Verona Campos
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Bernardo J.
Fonseca, Marina A.
Segantini, Verona Campos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Historical Controversies
Video Production
Argumentation
History and Philosophy of Science
Teaching Sciences
topic Historical Controversies
Video Production
Argumentation
History and Philosophy of Science
Teaching Sciences
description This article presents a methodology to teach about the nature of sciences and their histories through the construction of controversial dialogs in order to promote reflective and engaging practices among undergraduate and graduate students.  This proposal seeks to establish the study’s guidelines and organize the distribution of tasks in groups to draft scripts of dialogs that bring relevant information and that produce antagonistic positions on controversial socioscientific issues. This information will later be recorded in short home videos of 5 to 10 minutes each, which will then be shown and discussed in the classroom. Finally, this article highlights some limitations of this methodology, primarily in the way it has been used in this study. By contrast, the advantages of its use are pinpointed as a didactic strategy that serves to stimulate historical research and critical thinking regarding the nature of science and its sociotechnical relations. 
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/15044
10.24117/2526-2270.2018.i5.11
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/15044
identifier_str_mv 10.24117/2526-2270.2018.i5.11
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/15044/12004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Bernardo J. Oliveira, Marina A. Fonseca, Verona Campos Segantini
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Bernardo J. Oliveira, Marina A. Fonseca, Verona Campos Segantini
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; No. 5 (2018): Dossier IDTC Special Issue | Methods and Cognitive Modelling in the History and Philosophy of Science–&–Education
Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; Núm. 5 (2018): Dossier IDTC Special Issue | Methods and Cognitive Modelling in the History and Philosophy of Science–&–Education
Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; No 5 (2018): Dossier IDTC Special Issue | Methods and Cognitive Modelling in the History and Philosophy of Science–&–Education
Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; n. 5 (2018): Dossier IDTC Special Issue | Methods and Cognitive Modelling in the History and Philosophy of Science–&–Education
2526-2270
reponame:Transversal (Belo Horizonte)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Transversal (Belo Horizonte)
collection Transversal (Belo Horizonte)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Transversal (Belo Horizonte) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mauroconde@ufmg.br
_version_ 1754913651074007040