The Writing of the History of Science from the Notion of Scientific Field
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Transversal (Belo Horizonte) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/34891 |
Resumo: | Does science depend on its historical context? Does understanding science as a social construction demand us to abandon rationalist perspectives of knowledge? Based on these issues, this article aims to discuss epistemological questions concerning the problem of the historicity of sciences. In first part, we analyze how different philosophical systems conceptualize this problem and point out to tensions that emerge when one tries to reconcile a rationalist with a historicist perspective of knowledge. Then, we discuss the sociological epistemology of Pierre Bourdieu arguing that the field autonomy is a key concept to understand what the author denominates the “social conditions of the progress of reason”. Finally, we present criteria to delimit the most relevant contexts in a case study on the history of science. |
id |
UFMG-26_feb83267b7ed8dbba2cf1a2992a57d0c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/34891 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-26 |
network_name_str |
Transversal (Belo Horizonte) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Writing of the History of Science from the Notion of Scientific FieldPierre BourdieuScientific FieldEpistemologyHistoriography of ScienceDoes science depend on its historical context? Does understanding science as a social construction demand us to abandon rationalist perspectives of knowledge? Based on these issues, this article aims to discuss epistemological questions concerning the problem of the historicity of sciences. In first part, we analyze how different philosophical systems conceptualize this problem and point out to tensions that emerge when one tries to reconcile a rationalist with a historicist perspective of knowledge. Then, we discuss the sociological epistemology of Pierre Bourdieu arguing that the field autonomy is a key concept to understand what the author denominates the “social conditions of the progress of reason”. Finally, we present criteria to delimit the most relevant contexts in a case study on the history of science. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais2020-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/3489110.24117/2526-2270.2020.i8.05Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; No. 8 (2020): Historiography of PhysicsTransversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; Núm. 8 (2020): Historiography of PhysicsTransversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; No 8 (2020): Historiography of PhysicsTransversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; n. 8 (2020): Historiography of Physics2526-2270reponame:Transversal (Belo Horizonte)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGenghttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/34891/27617Copyright (c) 2020 Ivã Gurgel, Graciella Watanabehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGurgel, IvãWatanabe, Graciella2021-07-26T19:46:14Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/34891Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/oaimauroconde@ufmg.br2526-22702526-2270opendoar:2021-07-26T19:46:14Transversal (Belo Horizonte) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Writing of the History of Science from the Notion of Scientific Field |
title |
The Writing of the History of Science from the Notion of Scientific Field |
spellingShingle |
The Writing of the History of Science from the Notion of Scientific Field Gurgel, Ivã Pierre Bourdieu Scientific Field Epistemology Historiography of Science |
title_short |
The Writing of the History of Science from the Notion of Scientific Field |
title_full |
The Writing of the History of Science from the Notion of Scientific Field |
title_fullStr |
The Writing of the History of Science from the Notion of Scientific Field |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Writing of the History of Science from the Notion of Scientific Field |
title_sort |
The Writing of the History of Science from the Notion of Scientific Field |
author |
Gurgel, Ivã |
author_facet |
Gurgel, Ivã Watanabe, Graciella |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Watanabe, Graciella |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gurgel, Ivã Watanabe, Graciella |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pierre Bourdieu Scientific Field Epistemology Historiography of Science |
topic |
Pierre Bourdieu Scientific Field Epistemology Historiography of Science |
description |
Does science depend on its historical context? Does understanding science as a social construction demand us to abandon rationalist perspectives of knowledge? Based on these issues, this article aims to discuss epistemological questions concerning the problem of the historicity of sciences. In first part, we analyze how different philosophical systems conceptualize this problem and point out to tensions that emerge when one tries to reconcile a rationalist with a historicist perspective of knowledge. Then, we discuss the sociological epistemology of Pierre Bourdieu arguing that the field autonomy is a key concept to understand what the author denominates the “social conditions of the progress of reason”. Finally, we present criteria to delimit the most relevant contexts in a case study on the history of science. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/34891 10.24117/2526-2270.2020.i8.05 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/34891 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.24117/2526-2270.2020.i8.05 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/34891/27617 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Ivã Gurgel, Graciella Watanabe https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Ivã Gurgel, Graciella Watanabe https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; No. 8 (2020): Historiography of Physics Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; Núm. 8 (2020): Historiography of Physics Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; No 8 (2020): Historiography of Physics Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; n. 8 (2020): Historiography of Physics 2526-2270 reponame:Transversal (Belo Horizonte) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Transversal (Belo Horizonte) |
collection |
Transversal (Belo Horizonte) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Transversal (Belo Horizonte) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mauroconde@ufmg.br |
_version_ |
1754913651254362112 |