The Brazilian development in the nineties – myths, circles, and structures

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Erber, Fábio
Data de Publicação: 2009
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Nova Economia (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/novaeconomia/article/view/392
Resumo: The article argues that theories of economic development are metaphors which have a strong mythical content, albeit unacknowledged by social scientists. The policies derived from such theories have two agendas: a “positive” agenda that states which problems should be tackled and how; and a “negative” agenda that contains issues and policies to be avoided. This approach is used to interpret the hegemonic view of development, as stated by the Washington Consensus, showing that such view contains all ingredients of a millenary myth – the crossing of the Desert towards a Promised Land. The two agendas of this view of development, which have ruled the Brazilian development strategy of the second half of the nineties, are then analyzed as applied to the Brazilian case. Finally, the article discusses alternative approaches to the present view of development, arguing for open-ended metaphors, as expressed by the Ulysses myth.
id UFMG-4_3f3943c6237cd72deaffdd3031f94924
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/392
network_acronym_str UFMG-4
network_name_str Nova Economia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Brazilian development in the nineties – myths, circles, and structuresThe Brazilian development in the nineties – myths, circles, and structuresEconomic developmentmythseconomic policyinstitutional changeproductive structurehistory.Desenvolvimento econômicomitospolítica econômicamudança institucionalestrutura produtivahistória.The article argues that theories of economic development are metaphors which have a strong mythical content, albeit unacknowledged by social scientists. The policies derived from such theories have two agendas: a “positive” agenda that states which problems should be tackled and how; and a “negative” agenda that contains issues and policies to be avoided. This approach is used to interpret the hegemonic view of development, as stated by the Washington Consensus, showing that such view contains all ingredients of a millenary myth – the crossing of the Desert towards a Promised Land. The two agendas of this view of development, which have ruled the Brazilian development strategy of the second half of the nineties, are then analyzed as applied to the Brazilian case. Finally, the article discusses alternative approaches to the present view of development, arguing for open-ended metaphors, as expressed by the Ulysses myth.O artigo argumenta que as teorias de desenvolvimento econômico são metáforas que têm um forte conteúdo mítico, embora este não seja normalmente reconhecido. As políticas que derivam destas teorias têm duas agendas: uma agenda “positiva”, que especifica quais problemas são relevantes e as formas aceitáveis de resolvê-los; e uma agenda “negativa”, que contém as questões e políticas que devem ser evitadas. Esta abordagem é usada para interpretar a visão hegemônica do desenvolvimento, tal como explicitada no Consenso de Washington, mostrando que esta visão contém todos os ingredientes de um mito milenarista – o da travessia do Deserto rumo à Terra Prometida. Analisa-se a seguir a aplicação das duas agendas desta visão de desenvolvimento ao caso brasileiro durante a segunda metade dos anos noventa. Finalmente, o artigo discute visões alternativas de desenvolvimento, argumentando a favor de metáforas abertas, como o mito de Ulisses.Departamento de Ciências Econômicas da UFMG2009-05-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/novaeconomia/article/view/392Nova Economia; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2002)Nova Economia; v. 12 n. 1 (2002)1980-53810103-6351reponame:Nova Economia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/novaeconomia/article/view/392/398Erber, Fábioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-08-10T23:19:09Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/392Revistahttps://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/novaeconomiaPUBhttps://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/novaeconomia/oai||ne@face.ufmg.br1980-53810103-6351opendoar:2020-08-10T23:19:09Nova Economia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Brazilian development in the nineties – myths, circles, and structures
The Brazilian development in the nineties – myths, circles, and structures
title The Brazilian development in the nineties – myths, circles, and structures
spellingShingle The Brazilian development in the nineties – myths, circles, and structures
Erber, Fábio
Economic development
myths
economic policy
institutional change
productive structure
history.
Desenvolvimento econômico
mitos
política econômica
mudança institucional
estrutura produtiva
história.
title_short The Brazilian development in the nineties – myths, circles, and structures
title_full The Brazilian development in the nineties – myths, circles, and structures
title_fullStr The Brazilian development in the nineties – myths, circles, and structures
title_full_unstemmed The Brazilian development in the nineties – myths, circles, and structures
title_sort The Brazilian development in the nineties – myths, circles, and structures
author Erber, Fábio
author_facet Erber, Fábio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Erber, Fábio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Economic development
myths
economic policy
institutional change
productive structure
history.
Desenvolvimento econômico
mitos
política econômica
mudança institucional
estrutura produtiva
história.
topic Economic development
myths
economic policy
institutional change
productive structure
history.
Desenvolvimento econômico
mitos
política econômica
mudança institucional
estrutura produtiva
história.
description The article argues that theories of economic development are metaphors which have a strong mythical content, albeit unacknowledged by social scientists. The policies derived from such theories have two agendas: a “positive” agenda that states which problems should be tackled and how; and a “negative” agenda that contains issues and policies to be avoided. This approach is used to interpret the hegemonic view of development, as stated by the Washington Consensus, showing that such view contains all ingredients of a millenary myth – the crossing of the Desert towards a Promised Land. The two agendas of this view of development, which have ruled the Brazilian development strategy of the second half of the nineties, are then analyzed as applied to the Brazilian case. Finally, the article discusses alternative approaches to the present view of development, arguing for open-ended metaphors, as expressed by the Ulysses myth.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-05-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/novaeconomia/article/view/392
url https://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/novaeconomia/article/view/392
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/novaeconomia/article/view/392/398
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Ciências Econômicas da UFMG
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Ciências Econômicas da UFMG
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Nova Economia; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2002)
Nova Economia; v. 12 n. 1 (2002)
1980-5381
0103-6351
reponame:Nova Economia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Nova Economia (Online)
collection Nova Economia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Nova Economia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ne@face.ufmg.br
_version_ 1799711057245110272