THE CREATION OF THE FRENCH METHOD: DISPUTES AROUND A TEACHING OBJECT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Educação em Revista |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/37505 |
Resumo: | This study aims to investigate how the Règlement Général d’Éducation Physique, nationallyknown as the French Method, was developed in France. It goes through in search of new representationsto understand this object, which, in its historicity, was marked by an eclectic philosophy. It dialogues withthe assumptions of Cultural History (CERTEAU, 1994; CHARTIER, 2002) and Micro-history (GINZBURG, 1991; REVEL, 1998) to understand the peculiarities that have marked its constitution andthe competition between individuals and institutions. In the process of developing the French Method,we can highlight eclecticism, an articulated power struggle of École de Joinville-le-Pont in order not to loseits representativeness historically built in the area. The institution has appropriated what they consideredto be the best theses and elements in circulation about Physical Education – Swedish Method, NaturalMethod, Demeny Method, and English sports – reconciling them to obtain a vast system. Its genesisallows us to understand the disputes that occurred in France for its circulation and authority over theformative dimension of the French citizen related to the uses of the body, as well as in foreign countries,such as Brazil. |
id |
UFMG-5_32fbb1dc40fca60024e9c7c0d71534d3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/37505 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-5 |
network_name_str |
Educação em Revista |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE CREATION OF THE FRENCH METHOD: DISPUTES AROUND A TEACHING OBJECT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATIONLA CREACIÓN DEL MÉTODO FRANCÉS: DISPUTAS ALREDEDOR DE UN OBJETO DE ENSEÑANZA DE LA EDUCACIÓN FÍSICAA CRIAÇÃO DO MÉTODO FRANCÊS: AS DISPUTAS EM TORNO DE UM OBJETO DE ENSINO DA EDUCAÇÃO FÍSICAMétodo Francêsguerra dos métodosecletismoFrench Methodwar of methodseclecticismMétodo Francésguerra de métodoseclecticismoThis study aims to investigate how the Règlement Général d’Éducation Physique, nationallyknown as the French Method, was developed in France. It goes through in search of new representationsto understand this object, which, in its historicity, was marked by an eclectic philosophy. It dialogues withthe assumptions of Cultural History (CERTEAU, 1994; CHARTIER, 2002) and Micro-history (GINZBURG, 1991; REVEL, 1998) to understand the peculiarities that have marked its constitution andthe competition between individuals and institutions. In the process of developing the French Method,we can highlight eclecticism, an articulated power struggle of École de Joinville-le-Pont in order not to loseits representativeness historically built in the area. The institution has appropriated what they consideredto be the best theses and elements in circulation about Physical Education – Swedish Method, NaturalMethod, Demeny Method, and English sports – reconciling them to obtain a vast system. Its genesisallows us to understand the disputes that occurred in France for its circulation and authority over theformative dimension of the French citizen related to the uses of the body, as well as in foreign countries,such as Brazil.Este estudio tiene como objetivo investigar cómo se desarrolló en Francia el RèglementGénéral d’Éducation Physique, conocido a nivel nacional como el Método Francés. Sigue en busca de nuevasrepresentaciones para comprender este objeto, que, en su historicidad, estuvo marcado por una filosofíaecléctica. Establece un diálogo con los presupuestos de Historia Cultural (CERTEAU, 1994;CHARTIER, 2002) y Microhistoria (GINZBURG, 1991; REVEL, 1998) para comprender laspeculiaridades que marcaron su constitución y las competencias entre individuos e instituciones. En elproceso de elaboración del Método Francés, se destaca el eclecticismo, un juego articulado de fuerzas dela École de Joinville-le-Pont para no perder su representatividad históricamente construida en el área. Lainstitución se apropió de lo que consideraba las mejores tesis y elementos en circulación sobre EducaciónFísica – Método Sueco, Método Natural, Método de Demeny y Deportes Ingleses –, conciliándolos conel objetivo de obtener un vasto sistema. Su génesis nos permite comprender las disputas internas queocurrieron en Francia para su circulación y autoridad sobre la dimensión formativa del ciudadano francésrelacionada con los usos del cuerpo, así como en países extranjeros, como Brasil.Este estudo objetiva investigar o modo como o Règlement Général d’Éducation Physique,designado nacionalmente como Método Francês, foi elaborado na França. Caminha em busca de novasrepresentações para compreender esse objeto que, na sua historicidade, foi marcado por uma filosofiaeclética. Dialoga com os pressupostos da História Cultural (CERTEAU, 1994; CHARTIER, 2002) e daMicro-história (GINZBURG, 1991; REVEL, 1998) para perceber as peculiaridades que marcaram a suaconstituição e as concorrências entre indivíduos e instituições. No processo de elaboração do MétodoFrancês, destaca-se o ecletismo, um jogo articulado de forças da École de Joinville-le-Pont, para não perdersua representatividade historicamente construída na área. A instituição apropriou-se do que consideroucomo as melhores teses e elementos em circulação sobre a Educação Física – Método Sueco, MétodoNatural, Método de Demeny e os esportes ingleses –, conciliando-os com vistas à obtenção de um sistemavasto. A sua gênese permite perceber as disputas intestinas ocorridas na França para a sua circulação esua autoridade sobre a dimensão formativa do cidadão francês relacionadas com os usos do corpo, bemcomo em países estrangeiros, como o Brasil.Educação em Revista 2020-10-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer reviewedRevisado por paresAvaliado por Parestextoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/37505Educação em Revista ; v. 36 n. 1 (2020): v.36 (2020)1982-66210102-4698reponame:Educação em Revistainstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/37505/29229https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBRUSCH, MARCELALAQUINI ELLER, MARCELOSCHNEIDER, OMAR 2021-12-15T18:43:00Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/37505Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevistaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/oai||sergiocirino99@yahoo.com|| revista@fae.ufmg.br1982-66210102-4698opendoar:2021-12-15T18:43Educação em Revista - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE CREATION OF THE FRENCH METHOD: DISPUTES AROUND A TEACHING OBJECT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION LA CREACIÓN DEL MÉTODO FRANCÉS: DISPUTAS ALREDEDOR DE UN OBJETO DE ENSEÑANZA DE LA EDUCACIÓN FÍSICA A CRIAÇÃO DO MÉTODO FRANCÊS: AS DISPUTAS EM TORNO DE UM OBJETO DE ENSINO DA EDUCAÇÃO FÍSICA |
title |
THE CREATION OF THE FRENCH METHOD: DISPUTES AROUND A TEACHING OBJECT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION |
spellingShingle |
THE CREATION OF THE FRENCH METHOD: DISPUTES AROUND A TEACHING OBJECT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION BRUSCH, MARCELA Método Francês guerra dos métodos ecletismo French Method war of methods eclecticism Método Francés guerra de métodos eclecticismo |
title_short |
THE CREATION OF THE FRENCH METHOD: DISPUTES AROUND A TEACHING OBJECT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION |
title_full |
THE CREATION OF THE FRENCH METHOD: DISPUTES AROUND A TEACHING OBJECT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION |
title_fullStr |
THE CREATION OF THE FRENCH METHOD: DISPUTES AROUND A TEACHING OBJECT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE CREATION OF THE FRENCH METHOD: DISPUTES AROUND A TEACHING OBJECT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION |
title_sort |
THE CREATION OF THE FRENCH METHOD: DISPUTES AROUND A TEACHING OBJECT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION |
author |
BRUSCH, MARCELA |
author_facet |
BRUSCH, MARCELA LAQUINI ELLER, MARCELO SCHNEIDER, OMAR |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
LAQUINI ELLER, MARCELO SCHNEIDER, OMAR |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
BRUSCH, MARCELA LAQUINI ELLER, MARCELO SCHNEIDER, OMAR |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Método Francês guerra dos métodos ecletismo French Method war of methods eclecticism Método Francés guerra de métodos eclecticismo |
topic |
Método Francês guerra dos métodos ecletismo French Method war of methods eclecticism Método Francés guerra de métodos eclecticismo |
description |
This study aims to investigate how the Règlement Général d’Éducation Physique, nationallyknown as the French Method, was developed in France. It goes through in search of new representationsto understand this object, which, in its historicity, was marked by an eclectic philosophy. It dialogues withthe assumptions of Cultural History (CERTEAU, 1994; CHARTIER, 2002) and Micro-history (GINZBURG, 1991; REVEL, 1998) to understand the peculiarities that have marked its constitution andthe competition between individuals and institutions. In the process of developing the French Method,we can highlight eclecticism, an articulated power struggle of École de Joinville-le-Pont in order not to loseits representativeness historically built in the area. The institution has appropriated what they consideredto be the best theses and elements in circulation about Physical Education – Swedish Method, NaturalMethod, Demeny Method, and English sports – reconciling them to obtain a vast system. Its genesisallows us to understand the disputes that occurred in France for its circulation and authority over theformative dimension of the French citizen related to the uses of the body, as well as in foreign countries,such as Brazil. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer reviewed Revisado por pares Avaliado por Pares texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/37505 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/37505 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/37505/29229 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Educação em Revista |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Educação em Revista |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Educação em Revista ; v. 36 n. 1 (2020): v.36 (2020) 1982-6621 0102-4698 reponame:Educação em Revista instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Educação em Revista |
collection |
Educação em Revista |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Educação em Revista - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sergiocirino99@yahoo.com|| revista@fae.ufmg.br |
_version_ |
1799711123666108416 |