Comparisons of counterfactual affirmative action policies at the Federal University of Minas Gerais

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: André Braz Golgher
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMG
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.1590/3610508/2020
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/37105
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5884-225X
Resumo: Tertiary education attendance in Brazil varies remarkably among different population groups. In order to decrease inequalities and increase the proportion of minorities in public universities, many institutions of higher education in Brazil have implemented affirmative action policies since the 2000s. The main objective of this paper was to analyze different counterfactual affirmative action policies at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) based on simulations, measuring the proportion of minorities and the level of academic performance at this institution under each scenario. The current quota policy of 50% for students from public secondary schools, divided between four main groups (non poor/non-minority; poor/non-minority; non-poor/minority; poor/minority), was shown to be well designed to promote higher proportions of minorities among the student body. However, if academic performance is also taken into account, the best options would be either a quota policy of 50% divided between poor and non-poor students or a bonus policy based on a linear function of course competitiveness with an average bonus of 6%.
id UFMG_ac0a8a457198d50294bfb33cc9265f8c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/37105
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling 2021-07-29T00:01:08Z2021-07-29T00:01:08Z2021361050122https://doi.org/10.1590/3610508/202018069053http://hdl.handle.net/1843/37105https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5884-225XTertiary education attendance in Brazil varies remarkably among different population groups. In order to decrease inequalities and increase the proportion of minorities in public universities, many institutions of higher education in Brazil have implemented affirmative action policies since the 2000s. The main objective of this paper was to analyze different counterfactual affirmative action policies at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) based on simulations, measuring the proportion of minorities and the level of academic performance at this institution under each scenario. The current quota policy of 50% for students from public secondary schools, divided between four main groups (non poor/non-minority; poor/non-minority; non-poor/minority; poor/minority), was shown to be well designed to promote higher proportions of minorities among the student body. However, if academic performance is also taken into account, the best options would be either a quota policy of 50% divided between poor and non-poor students or a bonus policy based on a linear function of course competitiveness with an average bonus of 6%.A proporção de indivíduos que frequenta a educação superior no Brasil varia de forma marcante entre os diferentes grupos da população. Como forma de diminuir a desigualdade no acesso à educação superior e aumentar a proporção de minorias na universidade públicas, muitas instituições de nível superior no Brasil implementaram políticas de ação afirmativa a partir de 2000. O objetivo principal desse artigo é analisar políticas contrafactuais de ação afirmativa na Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), a partir de simulações que mediram a proporção de minorias e o desempenho acadêmico nessa instituição. A atual política de 50% de cotas para estudantes do ensino médio público dividida em quatro grupos principais (não pobre/não negro; pobre/não negro; não pobre/negro; pobre/negro) se mostrou eficaz para promover a inclusão de maiores proporções de minorias na universidade. Entretanto, se o desempenho acadêmico é levado em conta, as melhores escolhas de políticas afirmativas seriam uma política de cotas de 50%, dividida entre pobres e não pobres, ou uma política de bônus baseada em uma função linear da competitividade do curso com bônus médio de 6%.engUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisUFMGBrasilFCE - DEPARTAMENTO DE CIÊNCIAS ECONÔMICASRevista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais (São Paulo)MinoriasProgramas de ação afirmativaUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisMinoritiesAffirmative action policiesBonusQuotasUFMGComparisons of counterfactual affirmative action policies at the Federal University of Minas GeraisComparações de políticas de ações afirmativas simuladas na Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisComparaisons de politiques d’actions positives simulées à L'Université Fédérale du Minas Geraisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbcsoc/v36n105/0102-6909-rbcsoc-36-105-e3610508.pdfAndré Braz Golgherapplication/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82118https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/37105/2/license.txtcda590c95a0b51b4d15f60c9642ca272MD52ORIGINALComparisons of counterfactual affirmative action policies at the Federal University of Minas Gerais.pdfComparisons of counterfactual affirmative action policies at the Federal University of Minas Gerais.pdfapplication/pdf603380https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/37105/1/Comparisons%20of%20counterfactual%20affirmative%20action%20policies%20at%20the%20Federal%20University%20of%20Minas%20Gerais.pdf9457c2db37f7d0d308fe8748c2b6751bMD511843/371052021-07-28 21:01:08.576oai:repositorio.ufmg.br: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ório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oaiopendoar:2021-07-29T00:01:08Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Comparisons of counterfactual affirmative action policies at the Federal University of Minas Gerais
dc.title.alternative.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Comparações de políticas de ações afirmativas simuladas na Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Comparaisons de politiques d’actions positives simulées à L'Université Fédérale du Minas Gerais
title Comparisons of counterfactual affirmative action policies at the Federal University of Minas Gerais
spellingShingle Comparisons of counterfactual affirmative action policies at the Federal University of Minas Gerais
André Braz Golgher
Minorities
Affirmative action policies
Bonus
Quotas
UFMG
Minorias
Programas de ação afirmativa
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
title_short Comparisons of counterfactual affirmative action policies at the Federal University of Minas Gerais
title_full Comparisons of counterfactual affirmative action policies at the Federal University of Minas Gerais
title_fullStr Comparisons of counterfactual affirmative action policies at the Federal University of Minas Gerais
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of counterfactual affirmative action policies at the Federal University of Minas Gerais
title_sort Comparisons of counterfactual affirmative action policies at the Federal University of Minas Gerais
author André Braz Golgher
author_facet André Braz Golgher
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv André Braz Golgher
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Minorities
Affirmative action policies
Bonus
Quotas
UFMG
topic Minorities
Affirmative action policies
Bonus
Quotas
UFMG
Minorias
Programas de ação afirmativa
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.subject.other.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Minorias
Programas de ação afirmativa
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
description Tertiary education attendance in Brazil varies remarkably among different population groups. In order to decrease inequalities and increase the proportion of minorities in public universities, many institutions of higher education in Brazil have implemented affirmative action policies since the 2000s. The main objective of this paper was to analyze different counterfactual affirmative action policies at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) based on simulations, measuring the proportion of minorities and the level of academic performance at this institution under each scenario. The current quota policy of 50% for students from public secondary schools, divided between four main groups (non poor/non-minority; poor/non-minority; non-poor/minority; poor/minority), was shown to be well designed to promote higher proportions of minorities among the student body. However, if academic performance is also taken into account, the best options would be either a quota policy of 50% divided between poor and non-poor students or a bonus policy based on a linear function of course competitiveness with an average bonus of 6%.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-07-29T00:01:08Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2021-07-29T00:01:08Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1843/37105
dc.identifier.doi.pt_BR.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1590/3610508/2020
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 18069053
dc.identifier.orcid.pt_BR.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5884-225X
url https://doi.org/10.1590/3610508/2020
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/37105
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5884-225X
identifier_str_mv 18069053
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais (São Paulo)
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFMG
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv FCE - DEPARTAMENTO DE CIÊNCIAS ECONÔMICAS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/37105/2/license.txt
https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/37105/1/Comparisons%20of%20counterfactual%20affirmative%20action%20policies%20at%20the%20Federal%20University%20of%20Minas%20Gerais.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv cda590c95a0b51b4d15f60c9642ca272
9457c2db37f7d0d308fe8748c2b6751b
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803589251004104704