ASPECTOS AMBIENTAIS DO CICLO DE VIDA DA TAIPA DE PILÃO

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ISABELA MARIA CARVALHO IUNES
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMS
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/5478
Resumo: Rammed Earth is a construction technique that has become important for sustainability due its lower embodied energy and carbon of extraction, production and construction phases. However, there aren’t many studies of rammed earth life cycle, especially with “cradle to cradle” boundaries. This study aims to asses environmental aspects of rammed earth walls since extraction phase until reuse phase (recycling and reversibility). Therefore, four cases of rammed earth walls were chosen, being different from the use, or not, of cement as stabilizer and the use of dynamic or manual compaction. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was the method applied to this study, in order to quantify environmental impacts indicators from renewable and non-renewable resources. As a result, the energy spent (MJ), carbon dioxide emission (g) and greenhouse gases emission (g) – GHG – were evaluated to show which phases are the most environmentally harmful and which rammed earth construction technology harms the most the environment. One thing the results indicated was that the transport phase is the most harmful one, releasing more carbon dioxide and GHG than all the others, but the cement stabilizer walls also harms the environment at production phase as well. Another thing was that the compaction process does not influence environmental aspects as much as any other activity or use of stabilizers, meaning that even though to use dynamic compaction, electric energy is spent, the dynamic equipment is still more practical, as it is easy to handle, it speeds the construction process and standardize wall layer compaction.
id UFMS_f787a0079e620c8491b426165082b8b7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufms.br:123456789/5478
network_acronym_str UFMS
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMS
repository_id_str 2124
spelling 2022-12-20T14:04:11Z2022-12-20T14:04:11Z2022https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/5478Rammed Earth is a construction technique that has become important for sustainability due its lower embodied energy and carbon of extraction, production and construction phases. However, there aren’t many studies of rammed earth life cycle, especially with “cradle to cradle” boundaries. This study aims to asses environmental aspects of rammed earth walls since extraction phase until reuse phase (recycling and reversibility). Therefore, four cases of rammed earth walls were chosen, being different from the use, or not, of cement as stabilizer and the use of dynamic or manual compaction. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was the method applied to this study, in order to quantify environmental impacts indicators from renewable and non-renewable resources. As a result, the energy spent (MJ), carbon dioxide emission (g) and greenhouse gases emission (g) – GHG – were evaluated to show which phases are the most environmentally harmful and which rammed earth construction technology harms the most the environment. One thing the results indicated was that the transport phase is the most harmful one, releasing more carbon dioxide and GHG than all the others, but the cement stabilizer walls also harms the environment at production phase as well. Another thing was that the compaction process does not influence environmental aspects as much as any other activity or use of stabilizers, meaning that even though to use dynamic compaction, electric energy is spent, the dynamic equipment is still more practical, as it is easy to handle, it speeds the construction process and standardize wall layer compaction.No contexto da sustentabilidade, o sistema construtivo taipa de pilão voltou a ser relevante por conta de sua baixa energia incorporada e baixa emissão de CO2 durante a extração da matéria-prima até sua execução. No entanto, existem lacunas quanto ao ciclo de vida da taipa nas fronteiras de “berço a berço”. Assim, foi feito um estudo dos aspectos ambientais da taipa de pilão nas etapas de extração e fabricação, transporte até a obra, construção da parede, manutenção, demolição e reuso (reciclagem ou reversibilidade). Para tal, selecionou-se quatro tipos de taipa de pilão, diferenciando a adição do estabilizante cimento e uso do compactador manual ou mecânico. Foi utilizado o método de análise de ciclo de vida (ACV), de modo a quantificar os indicadores energético e ambiental por meio do consumo de fontes renováveis, de fontes não renováveis que cada insumo consumia nas etapas. Como resultado, foram obtidos valores de consumo de energia (MJ), emissões de gás carbônico (g) e emissões de poluentes (g), mostrando quais etapas são as mais prejudiciais ao meio ambiente, e quais variáveis tecnológicas do processo construtivo da taipa causaram mudanças consideráveis nos aspectos ambientais. Os resultados mostraram que entre as etapas analisadas, o transporte é a mais prejudicial, com maiores emissões de gás carbônico e poluentes, sendo a taipa de pilão estabilizada mais nociva ambientalmente por conta da etapa de fabricação do cimento. Por fim, foi comprovado que independente da composição da mistura da taipa, diferentes processos de compactação não têm influência relevante nos resultados do consumo de energia e nas emissões de gases. Sendo assim, seria viável a utilização de compactadores mecanizados por conta da sua facilidade de manuseio, agilidade no processo construtivo, e padronização da compactação das camadas da parede.Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do SulUFMSBrasilACV, berço a berço, indicador ambiental, construção com terraASPECTOS AMBIENTAIS DO CICLO DE VIDA DA TAIPA DE PILÃOinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisAna Paula da Silva MilaniISABELA MARIA CARVALHO IUNESinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMSinstname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)instacron:UFMSORIGINALTCC DEFESA - ISABELA IUNES.pdfTCC DEFESA - ISABELA IUNES.pdfapplication/pdf2039800https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/5478/-1/TCC%20DEFESA%20-%20ISABELA%20IUNES.pdf70f91e15b863d6058faf8806b7a0bb01MD5-1123456789/54782022-12-20 10:04:12.676oai:repositorio.ufms.br:123456789/5478Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufms.br/oai/requestri.prograd@ufms.bropendoar:21242022-12-20T14:04:12Repositório Institucional da UFMS - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv ASPECTOS AMBIENTAIS DO CICLO DE VIDA DA TAIPA DE PILÃO
title ASPECTOS AMBIENTAIS DO CICLO DE VIDA DA TAIPA DE PILÃO
spellingShingle ASPECTOS AMBIENTAIS DO CICLO DE VIDA DA TAIPA DE PILÃO
ISABELA MARIA CARVALHO IUNES
ACV, berço a berço, indicador ambiental, construção com terra
title_short ASPECTOS AMBIENTAIS DO CICLO DE VIDA DA TAIPA DE PILÃO
title_full ASPECTOS AMBIENTAIS DO CICLO DE VIDA DA TAIPA DE PILÃO
title_fullStr ASPECTOS AMBIENTAIS DO CICLO DE VIDA DA TAIPA DE PILÃO
title_full_unstemmed ASPECTOS AMBIENTAIS DO CICLO DE VIDA DA TAIPA DE PILÃO
title_sort ASPECTOS AMBIENTAIS DO CICLO DE VIDA DA TAIPA DE PILÃO
author ISABELA MARIA CARVALHO IUNES
author_facet ISABELA MARIA CARVALHO IUNES
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Ana Paula da Silva Milani
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ISABELA MARIA CARVALHO IUNES
contributor_str_mv Ana Paula da Silva Milani
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ACV, berço a berço, indicador ambiental, construção com terra
topic ACV, berço a berço, indicador ambiental, construção com terra
description Rammed Earth is a construction technique that has become important for sustainability due its lower embodied energy and carbon of extraction, production and construction phases. However, there aren’t many studies of rammed earth life cycle, especially with “cradle to cradle” boundaries. This study aims to asses environmental aspects of rammed earth walls since extraction phase until reuse phase (recycling and reversibility). Therefore, four cases of rammed earth walls were chosen, being different from the use, or not, of cement as stabilizer and the use of dynamic or manual compaction. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was the method applied to this study, in order to quantify environmental impacts indicators from renewable and non-renewable resources. As a result, the energy spent (MJ), carbon dioxide emission (g) and greenhouse gases emission (g) – GHG – were evaluated to show which phases are the most environmentally harmful and which rammed earth construction technology harms the most the environment. One thing the results indicated was that the transport phase is the most harmful one, releasing more carbon dioxide and GHG than all the others, but the cement stabilizer walls also harms the environment at production phase as well. Another thing was that the compaction process does not influence environmental aspects as much as any other activity or use of stabilizers, meaning that even though to use dynamic compaction, electric energy is spent, the dynamic equipment is still more practical, as it is easy to handle, it speeds the construction process and standardize wall layer compaction.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2022-12-20T14:04:11Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2022-12-20T14:04:11Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/5478
url https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/5478
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFMS
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMS
instname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
instacron:UFMS
instname_str Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
instacron_str UFMS
institution UFMS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/5478/-1/TCC%20DEFESA%20-%20ISABELA%20IUNES.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 70f91e15b863d6058faf8806b7a0bb01
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMS - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ri.prograd@ufms.br
_version_ 1807552848481746944