Iconologia, Alegorismo Medieval e o conceito de habitus na obra de E. Panofsky

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Neto, Liszt Vianna
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Artefilosofia
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/585
Resumo: The present article addresses the concept of habitus according to Erwin Panofsky's work Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism, seeking todistance it from past historiographical traditions–such as Wölfflin's, Riegl's, Warburg's and Cassirer's. It also aims at the debates which Panofsky's works engendered, and the influence that his theory and methodology exerted, through the concept of habitus, upon authors coming from the most diverse fields of knowledge. Such influence would cause this concept to be readapted by authors such as Gombrich, Eco, Bourdieu and Chartier. These last two recognized in the concept Panofsky's overcomingof his criticisms of Wölfflin and Riegl: the overcoming of Positivism and Formalism, as well as the abandonment of the search for the pioneer,oftheidea of anindividual's freedom and capacity for invention,of the psychological approach to genius and his detachment from the“History ofthe Spirit”. Despite being an efficient theoretical solution to many open historical questions (some of them common to The Annales School), this concept received very little attention from historians and theoreticians. Most often they turn their sights strictly to his renowned Iconologic method, or to the "symbolic forms". However, both the concept of habitus and the Iconologic method share a common historiographic genesis. Both come from Panofsky's interest in the Gothic phenomena,in Scholasticism–especially from his interest in Aquinas and Suger–and in the Sacred Allegorism. Allegorism–the medieval idea of revealing triple meanings inimages and texts–is the basis upon which Panofsky conceived of his tripartite method of artistic meaning investigation: the Iconology. Likewise, the elaboration of the concept of habitus and his renowned thesis from Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism share a scholastic foundation with Allegorism itself.
id UFOP-1_540957937c1a21c27589cfd5ec638023
oai_identifier_str oai:pp.www.periodicos.ufop.br:article/585
network_acronym_str UFOP-1
network_name_str Artefilosofia
repository_id_str
spelling Iconologia, Alegorismo Medieval e o conceito de habitus na obra de E. PanofskyArt HistoryHistoriographyPanofskyHistória da ArteHistoriografiaPanofskyThe present article addresses the concept of habitus according to Erwin Panofsky's work Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism, seeking todistance it from past historiographical traditions–such as Wölfflin's, Riegl's, Warburg's and Cassirer's. It also aims at the debates which Panofsky's works engendered, and the influence that his theory and methodology exerted, through the concept of habitus, upon authors coming from the most diverse fields of knowledge. Such influence would cause this concept to be readapted by authors such as Gombrich, Eco, Bourdieu and Chartier. These last two recognized in the concept Panofsky's overcomingof his criticisms of Wölfflin and Riegl: the overcoming of Positivism and Formalism, as well as the abandonment of the search for the pioneer,oftheidea of anindividual's freedom and capacity for invention,of the psychological approach to genius and his detachment from the“History ofthe Spirit”. Despite being an efficient theoretical solution to many open historical questions (some of them common to The Annales School), this concept received very little attention from historians and theoreticians. Most often they turn their sights strictly to his renowned Iconologic method, or to the "symbolic forms". However, both the concept of habitus and the Iconologic method share a common historiographic genesis. Both come from Panofsky's interest in the Gothic phenomena,in Scholasticism–especially from his interest in Aquinas and Suger–and in the Sacred Allegorism. Allegorism–the medieval idea of revealing triple meanings inimages and texts–is the basis upon which Panofsky conceived of his tripartite method of artistic meaning investigation: the Iconology. Likewise, the elaboration of the concept of habitus and his renowned thesis from Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism share a scholastic foundation with Allegorism itself.Este trabalho abrange o conceito de habitus segundo a obra Arquitetura Gótica e Escolástica de Erwin Panofsky, visando o seu distanciamento das historiografias passadas – como a de Wölfflin, Riegl, Warburg ou Cassirer –, os debates que os trabalhos de Panofsky produziram, e a influência que sua teoria e metodologia exerceram sobre autores das mais diversas áreas através desse conceito. Tal influência faria com que o conceito fosse reapropriado por autores como Gombrich, Eco, Bourdieu e Chartier. Os dois últimos, especialmente, reconheceram no habitus a superação, por Panofsky, de suas críticas à obra de Wölfflin e Riegl: a superação do positivismo e do formalismo, assim como o abandono da procura pelo precursor, da idéia de uma capacidade e liberdade da invenção individual, da abordagem psicológica do gênio e seu distanciamento da “História do Espírito”. Apesar de se mostrar uma eficaz solução teórica a muitas questões históricas abertas até então (algumas comuns também à escola dos Annales), foi dedicada a esse conceito muita pouca atenção por parte de historiadores e teóricos. Na maioria das vezes, estes se voltam apenas para seu renomado método Iconológico, ou para as “formas simbólicas”. Contudo, há no conceito de habitus e na Iconologia uma gênese historiográfica muito próxima. Ambos surgem do interesse de Panofsky pelo fenômeno gótico, pela escolástica – especialmente por Aquino e Suger – e pelo Alegorismo sagrado. O Alegorismo – a concepção medieval de se revelar sentidos trinos em textos e imagens – é a base na qual Panofsky concebeu seu método tripartite de investigação do significado artístico: a Iconologia. Do mesmo modo, a formulação do habitus e de sua renomada tese em Arquitetura Gótica e Escolástica tem uma base escolástica em comum com o próprio Alegorismo.Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto2017-04-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/585Artefilosofia; v. 7 n. 12 (2012): Teatro e espaço urbano; 155-176Artefilosofia; Vol. 7 No. 12 (2012): Teatro e espaço urbano; 155-1762526-78921809-8274reponame:Artefilosofiainstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOPporhttps://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/585/541Copyright (c) 2017 Revista ArteFilosofiahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNeto, Liszt Vianna2022-03-25T11:18:49Zoai:pp.www.periodicos.ufop.br:article/585Revistahttps://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/oaiartefilosofia.defil@ufop.edu.br || periodicos.sisbin@ufop.edu.br1809-82742526-7892opendoar:2022-03-25T11:18:49Artefilosofia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Iconologia, Alegorismo Medieval e o conceito de habitus na obra de E. Panofsky
title Iconologia, Alegorismo Medieval e o conceito de habitus na obra de E. Panofsky
spellingShingle Iconologia, Alegorismo Medieval e o conceito de habitus na obra de E. Panofsky
Neto, Liszt Vianna
Art History
Historiography
Panofsky
História da Arte
Historiografia
Panofsky
title_short Iconologia, Alegorismo Medieval e o conceito de habitus na obra de E. Panofsky
title_full Iconologia, Alegorismo Medieval e o conceito de habitus na obra de E. Panofsky
title_fullStr Iconologia, Alegorismo Medieval e o conceito de habitus na obra de E. Panofsky
title_full_unstemmed Iconologia, Alegorismo Medieval e o conceito de habitus na obra de E. Panofsky
title_sort Iconologia, Alegorismo Medieval e o conceito de habitus na obra de E. Panofsky
author Neto, Liszt Vianna
author_facet Neto, Liszt Vianna
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Neto, Liszt Vianna
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Art History
Historiography
Panofsky
História da Arte
Historiografia
Panofsky
topic Art History
Historiography
Panofsky
História da Arte
Historiografia
Panofsky
description The present article addresses the concept of habitus according to Erwin Panofsky's work Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism, seeking todistance it from past historiographical traditions–such as Wölfflin's, Riegl's, Warburg's and Cassirer's. It also aims at the debates which Panofsky's works engendered, and the influence that his theory and methodology exerted, through the concept of habitus, upon authors coming from the most diverse fields of knowledge. Such influence would cause this concept to be readapted by authors such as Gombrich, Eco, Bourdieu and Chartier. These last two recognized in the concept Panofsky's overcomingof his criticisms of Wölfflin and Riegl: the overcoming of Positivism and Formalism, as well as the abandonment of the search for the pioneer,oftheidea of anindividual's freedom and capacity for invention,of the psychological approach to genius and his detachment from the“History ofthe Spirit”. Despite being an efficient theoretical solution to many open historical questions (some of them common to The Annales School), this concept received very little attention from historians and theoreticians. Most often they turn their sights strictly to his renowned Iconologic method, or to the "symbolic forms". However, both the concept of habitus and the Iconologic method share a common historiographic genesis. Both come from Panofsky's interest in the Gothic phenomena,in Scholasticism–especially from his interest in Aquinas and Suger–and in the Sacred Allegorism. Allegorism–the medieval idea of revealing triple meanings inimages and texts–is the basis upon which Panofsky conceived of his tripartite method of artistic meaning investigation: the Iconology. Likewise, the elaboration of the concept of habitus and his renowned thesis from Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism share a scholastic foundation with Allegorism itself.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/585
url https://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/585
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/585/541
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista ArteFilosofia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista ArteFilosofia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Artefilosofia; v. 7 n. 12 (2012): Teatro e espaço urbano; 155-176
Artefilosofia; Vol. 7 No. 12 (2012): Teatro e espaço urbano; 155-176
2526-7892
1809-8274
reponame:Artefilosofia
instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron:UFOP
instname_str Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron_str UFOP
institution UFOP
reponame_str Artefilosofia
collection Artefilosofia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Artefilosofia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artefilosofia.defil@ufop.edu.br || periodicos.sisbin@ufop.edu.br
_version_ 1798313557401534464