The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pihlainen, Kalle
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: História da Historiografia
Texto Completo: https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1527
Resumo: In this article, I investigate the role of a particular kind of ‘materiality’ at work in the writing and reading of history. This involves examining the challenges posed to constructivist approaches to history by various post-linguistic-turn claims about presence and experience as well as by so-called post-narrativism. The core focus will be on outlining an argument for updating ‘narrativist’ or constructivist theory of history to deal with these recent concerns. This requires directing more attention to the relations between author, text, and reader, particularly concerning the key issues of reality, embodiment, and immersion. To demonstrate the value of approaching these relations in terms of ‘materiality,’ I consider three questions aimed at illuminating the balancing act between referentiality and invention performed in history writing as a genre: How can language ‘embody’ reality? How do referential texts encode reality? And, how could we read referential texts specifically with respect to reality?
id UFOP-2_5ffb746bb24fd6ce622c82b3096222c7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/1527
network_acronym_str UFOP-2
network_name_str História da Historiografia
repository_id_str
spelling The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading HistoryLas posibilidades de ‘materialidad’ en la escritura y la lectura de la historiaLas posibilidades de ‘materialidad’ en la escritura y la lectura de la historiaExperienceConstructivismReceptionExperiênciaConstrutivismoRecepçãoExperienciaConstructivismoRecepciónIn this article, I investigate the role of a particular kind of ‘materiality’ at work in the writing and reading of history. This involves examining the challenges posed to constructivist approaches to history by various post-linguistic-turn claims about presence and experience as well as by so-called post-narrativism. The core focus will be on outlining an argument for updating ‘narrativist’ or constructivist theory of history to deal with these recent concerns. This requires directing more attention to the relations between author, text, and reader, particularly concerning the key issues of reality, embodiment, and immersion. To demonstrate the value of approaching these relations in terms of ‘materiality,’ I consider three questions aimed at illuminating the balancing act between referentiality and invention performed in history writing as a genre: How can language ‘embody’ reality? How do referential texts encode reality? And, how could we read referential texts specifically with respect to reality?En este artículo investigo el rol de una clase particular de ‘materialidad’ que opera en la escritura y la lectura de la historia. Esto implica examinar los desafíos planteados a los enfoques constructivistas de la historia tanto por los argumentos del giro post-lingüístico sobre la presencia y la experiencia como por el denomindado post-narrativismo. El foco central será presentar un argumento para actualizar la teoría de la historia ‘narrativista’ o constructivista a fin de que esta pueda lidiar con esas preocupaciones recientes. Esto requiere dedicar mayor atención a las relaciones entre autor, texto y lector, particularmente respecto de los asuntos clave relativos a la realidad, la corporalidad (embodiment) y la inmersión. Para mostrar la utilidad del acercamiento a esas relaciones en términos de ‘materialidad’, considero tres preguntas que apuntan a iluminar el acto de equilibrarentre referencialidad e invención performado en la escritura de la historia como género: ¿cómo puede el lenguaje ‘corporizar’ (embody) la realidad? ¿Cómo pueden los textos referenciales codificar la realidad? Y ¿cómo podríamos leer los textos referenciales, específicamente con respecto a la realidad?Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2019-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/152710.15848/hh.v12i31.1527História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 12 No. 31 (2019); 47-81História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 12 Núm. 31 (2019); 47-81História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 12 n. 31 (2019); 47-811983-9928reponame:História da Historiografiainstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOPenghttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1527/804Pihlainen, Kalleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-05-02T02:36:25Zoai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/1527Revistahttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revistaPUBhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/oaivaldei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com1983-99281983-9928opendoar:2020-05-02T02:36:25História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History
Las posibilidades de ‘materialidad’ en la escritura y la lectura de la historia
Las posibilidades de ‘materialidad’ en la escritura y la lectura de la historia
title The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History
spellingShingle The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History
Pihlainen, Kalle
Experience
Constructivism
Reception
Experiência
Construtivismo
Recepção
Experiencia
Constructivismo
Recepción
title_short The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History
title_full The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History
title_fullStr The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History
title_full_unstemmed The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History
title_sort The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History
author Pihlainen, Kalle
author_facet Pihlainen, Kalle
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pihlainen, Kalle
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Experience
Constructivism
Reception
Experiência
Construtivismo
Recepção
Experiencia
Constructivismo
Recepción
topic Experience
Constructivism
Reception
Experiência
Construtivismo
Recepção
Experiencia
Constructivismo
Recepción
description In this article, I investigate the role of a particular kind of ‘materiality’ at work in the writing and reading of history. This involves examining the challenges posed to constructivist approaches to history by various post-linguistic-turn claims about presence and experience as well as by so-called post-narrativism. The core focus will be on outlining an argument for updating ‘narrativist’ or constructivist theory of history to deal with these recent concerns. This requires directing more attention to the relations between author, text, and reader, particularly concerning the key issues of reality, embodiment, and immersion. To demonstrate the value of approaching these relations in terms of ‘materiality,’ I consider three questions aimed at illuminating the balancing act between referentiality and invention performed in history writing as a genre: How can language ‘embody’ reality? How do referential texts encode reality? And, how could we read referential texts specifically with respect to reality?
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1527
10.15848/hh.v12i31.1527
url https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1527
identifier_str_mv 10.15848/hh.v12i31.1527
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1527/804
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 12 No. 31 (2019); 47-81
História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 12 Núm. 31 (2019); 47-81
História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 12 n. 31 (2019); 47-81
1983-9928
reponame:História da Historiografia
instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron:UFOP
instname_str Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron_str UFOP
institution UFOP
reponame_str História da Historiografia
collection História da Historiografia
repository.name.fl_str_mv História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv valdei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com
_version_ 1797220359811891200