Why is making mistakes still so wrong? Some reflections on the role of error in mathematics teaching and assessment.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vaz, Rafael Filipe Novôa
Publication Date: 2022
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Revemop
Download full: https://periodicos.ufop.br/revemop/article/view/5413
Summary: Some obstacles need to be discussed and overcome so that evaluative practices aimed at learning can be implemented in the educational system. Thinking about a formative assessment, whether through exams or other assessment formats, requires breaking the classificatory view of assessment and the dichotomous perspective of error. The main argument I defend in this text is that the existence of a formative assessment permeates the recognition of error as an element of great pedagogical potential. By interpreting the error as representing 'not learning', 'not knowing', we reduce the possibilities for didactic interventions. However, if we interpret the error as an element of a process, of a knowledge under construction, breaking the dichotomy of right and wrong, we expand the perspectives of using the error as a springboard for learning.
id UFOP-3_480bc6d4018d67db7265bc255522ef6a
oai_identifier_str oai:pp.www.periodicos.ufop.br:article/5413
network_acronym_str UFOP-3
network_name_str Revemop
repository_id_str
spelling Why is making mistakes still so wrong? Some reflections on the role of error in mathematics teaching and assessment.¿Por qué cometer errores sigue siendo tan malo? Algunas reflexiones sobre el papel del error en la enseñanza y evaluación de las matemáticas.Por que errar ainda é tão errado? Algumas reflexões sobre o papel do erro no ensino e na avaliação de matemática.AssessmentMistakeMathFormative assessmentApprenticeshipsEvaluaciónErrorMatemáticasEvaluación formativaAprendizajesAvaliaçãoErroMatemáticaAvaliação formativaAprendizagensSome obstacles need to be discussed and overcome so that evaluative practices aimed at learning can be implemented in the educational system. Thinking about a formative assessment, whether through exams or other assessment formats, requires breaking the classificatory view of assessment and the dichotomous perspective of error. The main argument I defend in this text is that the existence of a formative assessment permeates the recognition of error as an element of great pedagogical potential. By interpreting the error as representing 'not learning', 'not knowing', we reduce the possibilities for didactic interventions. However, if we interpret the error as an element of a process, of a knowledge under construction, breaking the dichotomy of right and wrong, we expand the perspectives of using the error as a springboard for learning.Es necesario discutir y superar algunos obstáculos para que las prácticas evaluativas orientadas al aprendizaje sean implementadas en el sistema educativo. Pensar una evaluación formativa, ya sea a través de exámenes u otros formatos de evaluación, exige romper con la visión clasificatoria de la evaluación y la perspectiva dicotómica del error. El principal argumento que defiendo en este texto es que la existencia de una evaluación formativa permea el reconocimiento del error como elemento de gran potencial pedagógico. Al interpretar el error como representante del 'no aprender', del 'no saber', reducimos las posibilidades de las intervenciones didácticas. Sin embargo, si interpretamos el error como elemento de un proceso, de un saber en construcción, rompiendo la dicotomía del bien y del mal, ampliamos las perspectivas de utilizar el error como trampolín para el aprendizaje.Alguns obstáculos precisam ser discutidos e superados para que as práticas avaliativas voltadas às aprendizagens sejam implementadas no sistema educacional. Pensar em uma avaliação formativa, seja através dos exames ou de outros formatos avaliativos, requer o rompimento da visão classificatória da avaliação e da perspectiva dicotômica do erro. O principal argumento que defendo neste texto é que a existência de uma avaliação formativa perpassa pelo reconhecimento do erro como um elemento de grande potencial pedagógico. Ao interpretarmos o erro como um representante da ‘não aprendizagem, do ‘não saber’, reduzimos as possibilidades de intervenções didáticas. Entretanto, se interpretamos o erro como elemento de um processo, de um saber em construção, rompendo a dicotomia do certo e do errado, ampliamos as perspectivas da utilização do erro como um trampolim para a aprendizagem.Editora da UFOP2022-05-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufop.br/revemop/article/view/541310.33532/revemop.e202215Revemop; v. 4 (2022): Rolling Pass; e2022152596-0245reponame:Revemopinstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOPporhttps://periodicos.ufop.br/revemop/article/view/5413/4069Copyright (c) 2022 Revemophttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVaz, Rafael Filipe Novôa 2022-05-30T17:01:49Zoai:pp.www.periodicos.ufop.br:article/5413Revistahttps://periodicos.ufop.br/revemop/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufop.br/revemop/oairevemop@ufop.edu.br||2596-02452596-0245opendoar:2022-05-30T17:01:49Revemop - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Why is making mistakes still so wrong? Some reflections on the role of error in mathematics teaching and assessment.
¿Por qué cometer errores sigue siendo tan malo? Algunas reflexiones sobre el papel del error en la enseñanza y evaluación de las matemáticas.
Por que errar ainda é tão errado? Algumas reflexões sobre o papel do erro no ensino e na avaliação de matemática.
title Why is making mistakes still so wrong? Some reflections on the role of error in mathematics teaching and assessment.
spellingShingle Why is making mistakes still so wrong? Some reflections on the role of error in mathematics teaching and assessment.
Vaz, Rafael Filipe Novôa
Assessment
Mistake
Math
Formative assessment
Apprenticeships
Evaluación
Error
Matemáticas
Evaluación formativa
Aprendizajes
Avaliação
Erro
Matemática
Avaliação formativa
Aprendizagens
title_short Why is making mistakes still so wrong? Some reflections on the role of error in mathematics teaching and assessment.
title_full Why is making mistakes still so wrong? Some reflections on the role of error in mathematics teaching and assessment.
title_fullStr Why is making mistakes still so wrong? Some reflections on the role of error in mathematics teaching and assessment.
title_full_unstemmed Why is making mistakes still so wrong? Some reflections on the role of error in mathematics teaching and assessment.
title_sort Why is making mistakes still so wrong? Some reflections on the role of error in mathematics teaching and assessment.
author Vaz, Rafael Filipe Novôa
author_facet Vaz, Rafael Filipe Novôa
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vaz, Rafael Filipe Novôa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Assessment
Mistake
Math
Formative assessment
Apprenticeships
Evaluación
Error
Matemáticas
Evaluación formativa
Aprendizajes
Avaliação
Erro
Matemática
Avaliação formativa
Aprendizagens
topic Assessment
Mistake
Math
Formative assessment
Apprenticeships
Evaluación
Error
Matemáticas
Evaluación formativa
Aprendizajes
Avaliação
Erro
Matemática
Avaliação formativa
Aprendizagens
description Some obstacles need to be discussed and overcome so that evaluative practices aimed at learning can be implemented in the educational system. Thinking about a formative assessment, whether through exams or other assessment formats, requires breaking the classificatory view of assessment and the dichotomous perspective of error. The main argument I defend in this text is that the existence of a formative assessment permeates the recognition of error as an element of great pedagogical potential. By interpreting the error as representing 'not learning', 'not knowing', we reduce the possibilities for didactic interventions. However, if we interpret the error as an element of a process, of a knowledge under construction, breaking the dichotomy of right and wrong, we expand the perspectives of using the error as a springboard for learning.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufop.br/revemop/article/view/5413
10.33532/revemop.e202215
url https://periodicos.ufop.br/revemop/article/view/5413
identifier_str_mv 10.33532/revemop.e202215
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufop.br/revemop/article/view/5413/4069
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revemop
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revemop
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da UFOP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da UFOP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revemop; v. 4 (2022): Rolling Pass; e202215
2596-0245
reponame:Revemop
instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron:UFOP
instname_str Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron_str UFOP
institution UFOP
reponame_str Revemop
collection Revemop
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revemop - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revemop@ufop.edu.br||
_version_ 1797068971374018560