Use of PCR–RFLP to identify Leishmania species in naturally-infected dogs.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andrade, Hélida Monteiro de
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Reis, Alexandre Barbosa, Santos, Sara Lopes dos, Volpini, Ângela Cristina, Marques, Marcos José, Romanha, Alvaro José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFOP
Texto Completo: http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/1059
Resumo: Tissue imprints on Giemsa stained slides from dogs were used to investigate the presence of Leishmania amastigotes by either optical microscopy (OM) or Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of DNA. Samples from skin, spleen, lymph node, liver and bone marrow from a Leishmaniasis endemic area dogs where Leishmania ( Leishmania ) chagasi and Leishmania ( Viannia) braziliensis are sympatric were studied. Dogs were initially diagnosed by Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF), as which 39 were IIF positive ( 1:40) and 16 negative. The IIF positive dogs were clinically grouped as symptomatic (n = 15), oligosymptomatic ( n = 12) and asymptomatic ( n = 12). Although PCR positivity was higher in symptomatic dogs, specially their skin samples, there was no significant difference among clinical groups or organs examined. Ten (62.5%) out of 16 IIF and OM negative animals were positive for PCR in at least one organ. Forty-eight positive PCR amplicons were further submitted to RFLP for Leishmania identification. All dogs were infected with L. ( L.) chagasiexcept one, infected withL. ( V.) braziliensis . PCR was more efficient than IIF and OM to diagnose canine visceral Leishmaniasis (CVL), regardless of the organ examined and the clinical form present. The use of PCR together with serology helps determining the extension of sub clinical infection in CVL endemic areas and provides a better estimate of the number of dogs to be targeted for control measures. In conclusion, our data reinforce the need for a specific diagnosis of canine infection in areas where diverse Leishmania species are sympatric and demonstrate that PCR–RFLP can be used to identify Leishmania species in dog tissue imprint stained slides.
id UFOP_89ba495c02076489232e04a2f00a89a7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufop.br:123456789/1059
network_acronym_str UFOP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFOP
repository_id_str 3233
spelling Use of PCR–RFLP to identify Leishmania species in naturally-infected dogs.LeishmaniaIndentificationDogsDiagnosis of visceral leishmaniasisTissue imprints on Giemsa stained slides from dogs were used to investigate the presence of Leishmania amastigotes by either optical microscopy (OM) or Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of DNA. Samples from skin, spleen, lymph node, liver and bone marrow from a Leishmaniasis endemic area dogs where Leishmania ( Leishmania ) chagasi and Leishmania ( Viannia) braziliensis are sympatric were studied. Dogs were initially diagnosed by Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF), as which 39 were IIF positive ( 1:40) and 16 negative. The IIF positive dogs were clinically grouped as symptomatic (n = 15), oligosymptomatic ( n = 12) and asymptomatic ( n = 12). Although PCR positivity was higher in symptomatic dogs, specially their skin samples, there was no significant difference among clinical groups or organs examined. Ten (62.5%) out of 16 IIF and OM negative animals were positive for PCR in at least one organ. Forty-eight positive PCR amplicons were further submitted to RFLP for Leishmania identification. All dogs were infected with L. ( L.) chagasiexcept one, infected withL. ( V.) braziliensis . PCR was more efficient than IIF and OM to diagnose canine visceral Leishmaniasis (CVL), regardless of the organ examined and the clinical form present. The use of PCR together with serology helps determining the extension of sub clinical infection in CVL endemic areas and provides a better estimate of the number of dogs to be targeted for control measures. In conclusion, our data reinforce the need for a specific diagnosis of canine infection in areas where diverse Leishmania species are sympatric and demonstrate that PCR–RFLP can be used to identify Leishmania species in dog tissue imprint stained slides.2012-07-10T16:53:30Z2012-07-10T16:53:30Z2006info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfANDRADE, H. M. de et al. Use of PCR–RFLP to identify Leishmania species in naturally-infected dogs. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 140, n. 3-4, p. 231-238, set. 2006. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401706002299>. Acesso em: 10 jul. 2012.03044017http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/1059O periódico Veterinary Parasitology concede permissão para depósito deste artigo no Repositório Institucional da UFOP. Número da licença: 3291410216072.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade, Hélida Monteiro deReis, Alexandre BarbosaSantos, Sara Lopes dosVolpini, Ângela CristinaMarques, Marcos JoséRomanha, Alvaro Joséengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFOPinstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOP2019-02-26T14:53:57Zoai:repositorio.ufop.br:123456789/1059Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufop.br/oai/requestrepositorio@ufop.edu.bropendoar:32332019-02-26T14:53:57Repositório Institucional da UFOP - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of PCR–RFLP to identify Leishmania species in naturally-infected dogs.
title Use of PCR–RFLP to identify Leishmania species in naturally-infected dogs.
spellingShingle Use of PCR–RFLP to identify Leishmania species in naturally-infected dogs.
Andrade, Hélida Monteiro de
Leishmania
Indentification
Dogs
Diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis
title_short Use of PCR–RFLP to identify Leishmania species in naturally-infected dogs.
title_full Use of PCR–RFLP to identify Leishmania species in naturally-infected dogs.
title_fullStr Use of PCR–RFLP to identify Leishmania species in naturally-infected dogs.
title_full_unstemmed Use of PCR–RFLP to identify Leishmania species in naturally-infected dogs.
title_sort Use of PCR–RFLP to identify Leishmania species in naturally-infected dogs.
author Andrade, Hélida Monteiro de
author_facet Andrade, Hélida Monteiro de
Reis, Alexandre Barbosa
Santos, Sara Lopes dos
Volpini, Ângela Cristina
Marques, Marcos José
Romanha, Alvaro José
author_role author
author2 Reis, Alexandre Barbosa
Santos, Sara Lopes dos
Volpini, Ângela Cristina
Marques, Marcos José
Romanha, Alvaro José
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andrade, Hélida Monteiro de
Reis, Alexandre Barbosa
Santos, Sara Lopes dos
Volpini, Ângela Cristina
Marques, Marcos José
Romanha, Alvaro José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Leishmania
Indentification
Dogs
Diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis
topic Leishmania
Indentification
Dogs
Diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis
description Tissue imprints on Giemsa stained slides from dogs were used to investigate the presence of Leishmania amastigotes by either optical microscopy (OM) or Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of DNA. Samples from skin, spleen, lymph node, liver and bone marrow from a Leishmaniasis endemic area dogs where Leishmania ( Leishmania ) chagasi and Leishmania ( Viannia) braziliensis are sympatric were studied. Dogs were initially diagnosed by Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF), as which 39 were IIF positive ( 1:40) and 16 negative. The IIF positive dogs were clinically grouped as symptomatic (n = 15), oligosymptomatic ( n = 12) and asymptomatic ( n = 12). Although PCR positivity was higher in symptomatic dogs, specially their skin samples, there was no significant difference among clinical groups or organs examined. Ten (62.5%) out of 16 IIF and OM negative animals were positive for PCR in at least one organ. Forty-eight positive PCR amplicons were further submitted to RFLP for Leishmania identification. All dogs were infected with L. ( L.) chagasiexcept one, infected withL. ( V.) braziliensis . PCR was more efficient than IIF and OM to diagnose canine visceral Leishmaniasis (CVL), regardless of the organ examined and the clinical form present. The use of PCR together with serology helps determining the extension of sub clinical infection in CVL endemic areas and provides a better estimate of the number of dogs to be targeted for control measures. In conclusion, our data reinforce the need for a specific diagnosis of canine infection in areas where diverse Leishmania species are sympatric and demonstrate that PCR–RFLP can be used to identify Leishmania species in dog tissue imprint stained slides.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006
2012-07-10T16:53:30Z
2012-07-10T16:53:30Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv ANDRADE, H. M. de et al. Use of PCR–RFLP to identify Leishmania species in naturally-infected dogs. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 140, n. 3-4, p. 231-238, set. 2006. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401706002299>. Acesso em: 10 jul. 2012.
03044017
http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/1059
identifier_str_mv ANDRADE, H. M. de et al. Use of PCR–RFLP to identify Leishmania species in naturally-infected dogs. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 140, n. 3-4, p. 231-238, set. 2006. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401706002299>. Acesso em: 10 jul. 2012.
03044017
url http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/1059
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFOP
instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron:UFOP
instname_str Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron_str UFOP
institution UFOP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFOP
collection Repositório Institucional da UFOP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFOP - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ufop.edu.br
_version_ 1813002805512765440