Comparative biodisponibility of a single dose captopril Formulations - doi:10.5020/18061230.2006.p5
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
DOI: | 10.5020/953 |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/953 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to evaluate, on human volunteers, the performance of one captopril tablet formulation (Neo-Química Comércio Indústria Ltda) against one standard tablet formulation (Capoten® 50mg Bristol-Myers Squibb Brasil S.A).Twenty-four healthy volunteers, as assessed by clinical and laboratory test evaluations, were enrolled in the study. The study was of a two way randomised crossover design comparing both captopril formulations. Plasma samples for determination of captopril were obtained by pre-dose and at frequent intervals for up to 24h post to one of the single dose formulations and were quantified by a validated method employing high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LCMSMS). The subjects were monitored through-out the study and the formulations were considered to be well tolerated. The maximum reached concentration (Cmax) and areas under the curve (AUC0-24h) were compared. Captopril Cmax geometric mean ratio was 108.5% (90% IC=101.8-115.7) of Capoten® values. Captopril AUC(0-24h) geometric mean ratio was 109.3% (90% CI=102.7-116.3) of Capoten®. Since 90% CI for both Cmax and ratio AUC(0-24h) for captopril were within the 80 to 125% interval proposed by both the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Sanitary Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), it is concluded that Captopril Neo- Química was bioequivalent to Capoten® for both the rate and extent of absorption. |
id |
UFOR-2_7b73b319f06e0a9488aafcffbe76a1c3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/953 |
network_acronym_str |
UFOR-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
spelling |
Comparative biodisponibility of a single dose captopril Formulations - doi:10.5020/18061230.2006.p5Biodisponibilidade comparativa de doses únicas de formulações de captopril - doi:10.5020/18061230.2006.p5CaptoprilBioequivalênciaFarmacocinéticaCromatografia líquida de alta pressão.The aim of this study was to evaluate, on human volunteers, the performance of one captopril tablet formulation (Neo-Química Comércio Indústria Ltda) against one standard tablet formulation (Capoten® 50mg Bristol-Myers Squibb Brasil S.A).Twenty-four healthy volunteers, as assessed by clinical and laboratory test evaluations, were enrolled in the study. The study was of a two way randomised crossover design comparing both captopril formulations. Plasma samples for determination of captopril were obtained by pre-dose and at frequent intervals for up to 24h post to one of the single dose formulations and were quantified by a validated method employing high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LCMSMS). The subjects were monitored through-out the study and the formulations were considered to be well tolerated. The maximum reached concentration (Cmax) and areas under the curve (AUC0-24h) were compared. Captopril Cmax geometric mean ratio was 108.5% (90% IC=101.8-115.7) of Capoten® values. Captopril AUC(0-24h) geometric mean ratio was 109.3% (90% CI=102.7-116.3) of Capoten®. Since 90% CI for both Cmax and ratio AUC(0-24h) for captopril were within the 80 to 125% interval proposed by both the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Sanitary Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), it is concluded that Captopril Neo- Química was bioequivalent to Capoten® for both the rate and extent of absorption.O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar, em voluntários sadios, a performance de uma formulação de um comprimido de Captopril (Neo-Química Comércio Indústria Ltda) comparando com a formulação de referência (Capoten® 50mg Bristol-Myers Squibb Brasil S.A). Vinte e quatro voluntários participaram do estudo após avaliações clínicas e laboratoriais. O estudo teve desenho aberto, randomizado e cruzado com dois períodos de internamento e intervalo de no mínimo duas semanas. Amostras plasmáticas para determinação de Captopril foram obtidas antes e em intervalos de até 24h após a administração de uma das formulações em dose única. Para a quantificação combinou-se cromatografia líquida de alta eficiência e espectrometria de massa. Os voluntários foram monitorados durante o estudo e as formulações consideradas bem toleradas. A concentração máxima obtida (Cmax) e a área sob a curva (AUC) foram comparadas. A média geométrica do Cmax para o Captopril Neo-Química foi 108,5 % (IC 90% = 101,8-115,7) e AUC0-24 foi 109,3% (90% IC=102,7-116,3) dos valores do Capoten®. Visto que 90% de Cmax, AUC0-24, apresentavam-se dentro do intervalo de confiança de 80-125% proposto pela Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) e pelo Food and Drug Administration (FDA), concluiu-se que o Captopril Neo-Química comprimido 50mg foi bioequivalente a Capoten??50mg, de acordo com sua taxa e extensão de absorção.Universidade de Fortaleza2012-01-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed Article""Avaliado pelos pares""Avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/95310.5020/953Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2006); 5-10Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 19 Núm. 1 (2006); 5-10Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 19 n. 1 (2006); 5-101806-1230reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúdeinstname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)instacron:UFORporhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/953/2116Soares, Aline Kércia AlvesQuental, Diana PierreMoraes, Maria Elisabete Amaral deMoraes, Manoel Odorico deBezerra, Fernando Antônio FrotaNucci, Gilberto deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-01-10T12:18:00Zoai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/953Revistahttps://periodicos.unifor.br/RBPS/oai1806-12301806-1222opendoar:2012-01-10T12:18Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative biodisponibility of a single dose captopril Formulations - doi:10.5020/18061230.2006.p5 Biodisponibilidade comparativa de doses únicas de formulações de captopril - doi:10.5020/18061230.2006.p5 |
title |
Comparative biodisponibility of a single dose captopril Formulations - doi:10.5020/18061230.2006.p5 |
spellingShingle |
Comparative biodisponibility of a single dose captopril Formulations - doi:10.5020/18061230.2006.p5 Comparative biodisponibility of a single dose captopril Formulations - doi:10.5020/18061230.2006.p5 Soares, Aline Kércia Alves Captopril Bioequivalência Farmacocinética Cromatografia líquida de alta pressão. Soares, Aline Kércia Alves Captopril Bioequivalência Farmacocinética Cromatografia líquida de alta pressão. |
title_short |
Comparative biodisponibility of a single dose captopril Formulations - doi:10.5020/18061230.2006.p5 |
title_full |
Comparative biodisponibility of a single dose captopril Formulations - doi:10.5020/18061230.2006.p5 |
title_fullStr |
Comparative biodisponibility of a single dose captopril Formulations - doi:10.5020/18061230.2006.p5 Comparative biodisponibility of a single dose captopril Formulations - doi:10.5020/18061230.2006.p5 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative biodisponibility of a single dose captopril Formulations - doi:10.5020/18061230.2006.p5 Comparative biodisponibility of a single dose captopril Formulations - doi:10.5020/18061230.2006.p5 |
title_sort |
Comparative biodisponibility of a single dose captopril Formulations - doi:10.5020/18061230.2006.p5 |
author |
Soares, Aline Kércia Alves |
author_facet |
Soares, Aline Kércia Alves Soares, Aline Kércia Alves Quental, Diana Pierre Moraes, Maria Elisabete Amaral de Moraes, Manoel Odorico de Bezerra, Fernando Antônio Frota Nucci, Gilberto de Quental, Diana Pierre Moraes, Maria Elisabete Amaral de Moraes, Manoel Odorico de Bezerra, Fernando Antônio Frota Nucci, Gilberto de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Quental, Diana Pierre Moraes, Maria Elisabete Amaral de Moraes, Manoel Odorico de Bezerra, Fernando Antônio Frota Nucci, Gilberto de |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Soares, Aline Kércia Alves Quental, Diana Pierre Moraes, Maria Elisabete Amaral de Moraes, Manoel Odorico de Bezerra, Fernando Antônio Frota Nucci, Gilberto de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Captopril Bioequivalência Farmacocinética Cromatografia líquida de alta pressão. |
topic |
Captopril Bioequivalência Farmacocinética Cromatografia líquida de alta pressão. |
description |
The aim of this study was to evaluate, on human volunteers, the performance of one captopril tablet formulation (Neo-Química Comércio Indústria Ltda) against one standard tablet formulation (Capoten® 50mg Bristol-Myers Squibb Brasil S.A).Twenty-four healthy volunteers, as assessed by clinical and laboratory test evaluations, were enrolled in the study. The study was of a two way randomised crossover design comparing both captopril formulations. Plasma samples for determination of captopril were obtained by pre-dose and at frequent intervals for up to 24h post to one of the single dose formulations and were quantified by a validated method employing high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LCMSMS). The subjects were monitored through-out the study and the formulations were considered to be well tolerated. The maximum reached concentration (Cmax) and areas under the curve (AUC0-24h) were compared. Captopril Cmax geometric mean ratio was 108.5% (90% IC=101.8-115.7) of Capoten® values. Captopril AUC(0-24h) geometric mean ratio was 109.3% (90% CI=102.7-116.3) of Capoten®. Since 90% CI for both Cmax and ratio AUC(0-24h) for captopril were within the 80 to 125% interval proposed by both the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Sanitary Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), it is concluded that Captopril Neo- Química was bioequivalent to Capoten® for both the rate and extent of absorption. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-01-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed Article" "Avaliado pelos pares" "Avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/953 10.5020/953 |
url |
https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/953 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5020/953 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/953/2116 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2006); 5-10 Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 19 Núm. 1 (2006); 5-10 Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 19 n. 1 (2006); 5-10 1806-1230 reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor) instacron:UFOR |
instname_str |
Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor) |
instacron_str |
UFOR |
institution |
UFOR |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
collection |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822182603671732224 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5020/953 |