National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Teixeira, Ilka Nicéia D’Aquino Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Labronici, Liliana Maria, Mantovani, Maria de Fátima
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
Texto Completo: https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/1177
Resumo: Objective: To identify the most prevalent nursing ethical issues published in scientific Brazilian journals. Methods: A systematic literature review with the following inclusion criteria: (1) articles on Nursing Ethics written in Portuguese, English, French, and Spanish; (2) published in Brazilian journals; (3) in the period from January 1997 to February 2009. The search was carried out in four databases BDENF, LILACS, MEDLINE, and SCIELO. The key-words were ethics AND nursing. The selected studies were classified into categories. The content of the articles were analyzed using the Collective Subject Discourse. The categories generated discourses by organizing the main excerpts from the abstracts of the selected studies, which are the “key expressions”. Results: A hundred and thirty three articles that met the inclusion criteria were classified into eight categories: 1. Nursing Care; 2. Dilemmas and Controversies; 3. Education; 4. Legal Aspects; 5. Research; 6. Management; 7. Values and Beliefs; 8. Perspectives and Health Policies. The category “Nursing Care” prevailed in 36% of the selected articles, and it was classified into six subcategories. “Dilemmas and Controversies” was the second most prevalent category (15%). Conclusion: The number of theoretical papers on ethical issues is high, but there is little research on the ethical experiences in nursing practice.
id UFOR-2_f922d54792d9ad8722e272f16c447c9f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/1177
network_acronym_str UFOR-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
repository_id_str
spelling National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80Produção científica nacional sobre ética de enfermagem: revisão sistemática da literatura - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80BioéticaÉticaEnfermagemLiteratura de Revisão como Assunto.Objective: To identify the most prevalent nursing ethical issues published in scientific Brazilian journals. Methods: A systematic literature review with the following inclusion criteria: (1) articles on Nursing Ethics written in Portuguese, English, French, and Spanish; (2) published in Brazilian journals; (3) in the period from January 1997 to February 2009. The search was carried out in four databases BDENF, LILACS, MEDLINE, and SCIELO. The key-words were ethics AND nursing. The selected studies were classified into categories. The content of the articles were analyzed using the Collective Subject Discourse. The categories generated discourses by organizing the main excerpts from the abstracts of the selected studies, which are the “key expressions”. Results: A hundred and thirty three articles that met the inclusion criteria were classified into eight categories: 1. Nursing Care; 2. Dilemmas and Controversies; 3. Education; 4. Legal Aspects; 5. Research; 6. Management; 7. Values and Beliefs; 8. Perspectives and Health Policies. The category “Nursing Care” prevailed in 36% of the selected articles, and it was classified into six subcategories. “Dilemmas and Controversies” was the second most prevalent category (15%). Conclusion: The number of theoretical papers on ethical issues is high, but there is little research on the ethical experiences in nursing practice.Objetivo: Identificar as questões éticas de enfermagem, prevalentes nos periódicos científicos brasileiros. Método: Revisão sistemática da literatura com os seguintes critérios de inclusão: (1) artigos sobre Ética de Enfermagem escritos em português, inglês, francês e espanhol; (2) publicados em periódicos nacionais; (3) período de janeiro de 1997 a fevereiro de 2009. A busca foi realizada em quatro bases de dados: BDENF, LILACS, MEDLINE e SCIELO. Utilizaram-se as palavras-chave Ética e Enfermagem. Os estudos selecionados foram classificados em categorias. Para a análise de conteúdo, os autores adotaram a técnica do Discurso do Sujeito Coletivo, construindo-se discursos para as categorias, a partir da reunião de trechos principais dos resumos dos estudos, que são as “expressões-chave”. Resultados: Cento e trinta e três artigos preencheram os critérios de inclusão, sendo classificados em oito categorias conforme o conteúdo do estudo: 1. Cuidado de Enfermagem; 2. Dilemas e Controvérsias; 3. Educação; 4. Aspectos Legais; 5. Pesquisas; 6. Gestão; 7. Valores e Crenças; 8. Perspectivas e Políticas de Saúde. A categoria “Cuidado de Enfermagem” foi mais prevalente, apresentando 36% dos artigos selecionados, sendo esses classificados em seis subcategorias. “Dilemas e Controvérsias” foi a segunda categoria prevalente (15%). Conclusão: O número de artigos teóricos sobre questões éticas é elevado; porém, há poucas pesquisas sobre as experiências éticas na prática de enfermagem.Universidade de Fortaleza2012-01-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed Article""Avaliado pelos pares""Avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/117710.5020/1177Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 23 No. 1 (2010); 80-91Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 23 Núm. 1 (2010); 80-91Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 23 n. 1 (2010); 80-911806-1230reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúdeinstname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)instacron:UFORporhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/1177/2296Teixeira, Ilka Nicéia D’Aquino OliveiraLabronici, Liliana MariaMantovani, Maria de Fátimainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-01-10T12:20:11Zoai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/1177Revistahttps://periodicos.unifor.br/RBPS/oai1806-12301806-1222opendoar:2012-01-10T12:20:11Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80
Produção científica nacional sobre ética de enfermagem: revisão sistemática da literatura - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80
title National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80
spellingShingle National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80
Teixeira, Ilka Nicéia D’Aquino Oliveira
Bioética
Ética
Enfermagem
Literatura de Revisão como Assunto.
title_short National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80
title_full National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80
title_fullStr National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80
title_full_unstemmed National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80
title_sort National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80
author Teixeira, Ilka Nicéia D’Aquino Oliveira
author_facet Teixeira, Ilka Nicéia D’Aquino Oliveira
Labronici, Liliana Maria
Mantovani, Maria de Fátima
author_role author
author2 Labronici, Liliana Maria
Mantovani, Maria de Fátima
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teixeira, Ilka Nicéia D’Aquino Oliveira
Labronici, Liliana Maria
Mantovani, Maria de Fátima
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bioética
Ética
Enfermagem
Literatura de Revisão como Assunto.
topic Bioética
Ética
Enfermagem
Literatura de Revisão como Assunto.
description Objective: To identify the most prevalent nursing ethical issues published in scientific Brazilian journals. Methods: A systematic literature review with the following inclusion criteria: (1) articles on Nursing Ethics written in Portuguese, English, French, and Spanish; (2) published in Brazilian journals; (3) in the period from January 1997 to February 2009. The search was carried out in four databases BDENF, LILACS, MEDLINE, and SCIELO. The key-words were ethics AND nursing. The selected studies were classified into categories. The content of the articles were analyzed using the Collective Subject Discourse. The categories generated discourses by organizing the main excerpts from the abstracts of the selected studies, which are the “key expressions”. Results: A hundred and thirty three articles that met the inclusion criteria were classified into eight categories: 1. Nursing Care; 2. Dilemmas and Controversies; 3. Education; 4. Legal Aspects; 5. Research; 6. Management; 7. Values and Beliefs; 8. Perspectives and Health Policies. The category “Nursing Care” prevailed in 36% of the selected articles, and it was classified into six subcategories. “Dilemmas and Controversies” was the second most prevalent category (15%). Conclusion: The number of theoretical papers on ethical issues is high, but there is little research on the ethical experiences in nursing practice.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed Article"
"Avaliado pelos pares"
"Avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/1177
10.5020/1177
url https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/1177
identifier_str_mv 10.5020/1177
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/1177/2296
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Fortaleza
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Fortaleza
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 23 No. 1 (2010); 80-91
Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 23 Núm. 1 (2010); 80-91
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 23 n. 1 (2010); 80-91
1806-1230
reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)
instacron:UFOR
instname_str Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)
instacron_str UFOR
institution UFOR
reponame_str Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
collection Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798313056653017088