National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/1177 |
Resumo: | Objective: To identify the most prevalent nursing ethical issues published in scientific Brazilian journals. Methods: A systematic literature review with the following inclusion criteria: (1) articles on Nursing Ethics written in Portuguese, English, French, and Spanish; (2) published in Brazilian journals; (3) in the period from January 1997 to February 2009. The search was carried out in four databases BDENF, LILACS, MEDLINE, and SCIELO. The key-words were ethics AND nursing. The selected studies were classified into categories. The content of the articles were analyzed using the Collective Subject Discourse. The categories generated discourses by organizing the main excerpts from the abstracts of the selected studies, which are the “key expressions”. Results: A hundred and thirty three articles that met the inclusion criteria were classified into eight categories: 1. Nursing Care; 2. Dilemmas and Controversies; 3. Education; 4. Legal Aspects; 5. Research; 6. Management; 7. Values and Beliefs; 8. Perspectives and Health Policies. The category “Nursing Care” prevailed in 36% of the selected articles, and it was classified into six subcategories. “Dilemmas and Controversies” was the second most prevalent category (15%). Conclusion: The number of theoretical papers on ethical issues is high, but there is little research on the ethical experiences in nursing practice. |
id |
UFOR-2_f922d54792d9ad8722e272f16c447c9f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/1177 |
network_acronym_str |
UFOR-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80Produção científica nacional sobre ética de enfermagem: revisão sistemática da literatura - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80BioéticaÉticaEnfermagemLiteratura de Revisão como Assunto.Objective: To identify the most prevalent nursing ethical issues published in scientific Brazilian journals. Methods: A systematic literature review with the following inclusion criteria: (1) articles on Nursing Ethics written in Portuguese, English, French, and Spanish; (2) published in Brazilian journals; (3) in the period from January 1997 to February 2009. The search was carried out in four databases BDENF, LILACS, MEDLINE, and SCIELO. The key-words were ethics AND nursing. The selected studies were classified into categories. The content of the articles were analyzed using the Collective Subject Discourse. The categories generated discourses by organizing the main excerpts from the abstracts of the selected studies, which are the “key expressions”. Results: A hundred and thirty three articles that met the inclusion criteria were classified into eight categories: 1. Nursing Care; 2. Dilemmas and Controversies; 3. Education; 4. Legal Aspects; 5. Research; 6. Management; 7. Values and Beliefs; 8. Perspectives and Health Policies. The category “Nursing Care” prevailed in 36% of the selected articles, and it was classified into six subcategories. “Dilemmas and Controversies” was the second most prevalent category (15%). Conclusion: The number of theoretical papers on ethical issues is high, but there is little research on the ethical experiences in nursing practice.Objetivo: Identificar as questões éticas de enfermagem, prevalentes nos periódicos científicos brasileiros. Método: Revisão sistemática da literatura com os seguintes critérios de inclusão: (1) artigos sobre Ética de Enfermagem escritos em português, inglês, francês e espanhol; (2) publicados em periódicos nacionais; (3) período de janeiro de 1997 a fevereiro de 2009. A busca foi realizada em quatro bases de dados: BDENF, LILACS, MEDLINE e SCIELO. Utilizaram-se as palavras-chave Ética e Enfermagem. Os estudos selecionados foram classificados em categorias. Para a análise de conteúdo, os autores adotaram a técnica do Discurso do Sujeito Coletivo, construindo-se discursos para as categorias, a partir da reunião de trechos principais dos resumos dos estudos, que são as “expressões-chave”. Resultados: Cento e trinta e três artigos preencheram os critérios de inclusão, sendo classificados em oito categorias conforme o conteúdo do estudo: 1. Cuidado de Enfermagem; 2. Dilemas e Controvérsias; 3. Educação; 4. Aspectos Legais; 5. Pesquisas; 6. Gestão; 7. Valores e Crenças; 8. Perspectivas e Políticas de Saúde. A categoria “Cuidado de Enfermagem” foi mais prevalente, apresentando 36% dos artigos selecionados, sendo esses classificados em seis subcategorias. “Dilemas e Controvérsias” foi a segunda categoria prevalente (15%). Conclusão: O número de artigos teóricos sobre questões éticas é elevado; porém, há poucas pesquisas sobre as experiências éticas na prática de enfermagem.Universidade de Fortaleza2012-01-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed Article""Avaliado pelos pares""Avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/117710.5020/1177Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 23 No. 1 (2010); 80-91Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 23 Núm. 1 (2010); 80-91Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 23 n. 1 (2010); 80-911806-1230reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúdeinstname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)instacron:UFORporhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/1177/2296Teixeira, Ilka Nicéia D’Aquino OliveiraLabronici, Liliana MariaMantovani, Maria de Fátimainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-01-10T12:20:11Zoai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/1177Revistahttps://periodicos.unifor.br/RBPS/oai1806-12301806-1222opendoar:2012-01-10T12:20:11Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80 Produção científica nacional sobre ética de enfermagem: revisão sistemática da literatura - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80 |
title |
National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80 |
spellingShingle |
National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80 Teixeira, Ilka Nicéia D’Aquino Oliveira Bioética Ética Enfermagem Literatura de Revisão como Assunto. |
title_short |
National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80 |
title_full |
National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80 |
title_fullStr |
National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80 |
title_full_unstemmed |
National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80 |
title_sort |
National scientific literature on nursing ethics: a systematic Review - doi:10.5020/18061230.2010.p80 |
author |
Teixeira, Ilka Nicéia D’Aquino Oliveira |
author_facet |
Teixeira, Ilka Nicéia D’Aquino Oliveira Labronici, Liliana Maria Mantovani, Maria de Fátima |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Labronici, Liliana Maria Mantovani, Maria de Fátima |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Teixeira, Ilka Nicéia D’Aquino Oliveira Labronici, Liliana Maria Mantovani, Maria de Fátima |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bioética Ética Enfermagem Literatura de Revisão como Assunto. |
topic |
Bioética Ética Enfermagem Literatura de Revisão como Assunto. |
description |
Objective: To identify the most prevalent nursing ethical issues published in scientific Brazilian journals. Methods: A systematic literature review with the following inclusion criteria: (1) articles on Nursing Ethics written in Portuguese, English, French, and Spanish; (2) published in Brazilian journals; (3) in the period from January 1997 to February 2009. The search was carried out in four databases BDENF, LILACS, MEDLINE, and SCIELO. The key-words were ethics AND nursing. The selected studies were classified into categories. The content of the articles were analyzed using the Collective Subject Discourse. The categories generated discourses by organizing the main excerpts from the abstracts of the selected studies, which are the “key expressions”. Results: A hundred and thirty three articles that met the inclusion criteria were classified into eight categories: 1. Nursing Care; 2. Dilemmas and Controversies; 3. Education; 4. Legal Aspects; 5. Research; 6. Management; 7. Values and Beliefs; 8. Perspectives and Health Policies. The category “Nursing Care” prevailed in 36% of the selected articles, and it was classified into six subcategories. “Dilemmas and Controversies” was the second most prevalent category (15%). Conclusion: The number of theoretical papers on ethical issues is high, but there is little research on the ethical experiences in nursing practice. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-01-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed Article" "Avaliado pelos pares" "Avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/1177 10.5020/1177 |
url |
https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/1177 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5020/1177 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/1177/2296 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 23 No. 1 (2010); 80-91 Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 23 Núm. 1 (2010); 80-91 Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 23 n. 1 (2010); 80-91 1806-1230 reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor) instacron:UFOR |
instname_str |
Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor) |
instacron_str |
UFOR |
institution |
UFOR |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
collection |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808844174441578496 |