Efeito protetor de coprodutos do processamento de frutas tropicais em cepas probióticas Lactobacillus após liofilização e armazenamento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Araújo, Caroliny Mesquita
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/17140
Resumo: The production of fruit represents a segment of great importance for the economy, since most of this production is destined to the processing industry for the manufacture of several products, with that, it generates large quantities of co-products agroindustries, these constituted of barks, seeds, bagasse, stalks and other parts of the fruit which contain in their composition simple sugars and non-digestible oligosaccharides, as well as phenolic compounds. It is believed that these co-products can act in the protection of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), such as Lactobacillus, during preservation processes applied in industry, replacing sugars that are generally used, adding value to these coproducts that are commonly discarded in the environment. This study evaluated the protective effect of co-products from the processing of tropical fruits (Malpighia glabra L.), cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) and guava (Psidium guayaba L.) on probiotic strains (Lactobacillus paracasei L-10, L. casei L-26 and L. acidophilus LA-05) after freeze-drying and storage. For this, analyzes of the viability of Lactobacillus strains were performed before and after the lyophilization process in the presence of the tested fruit co-products. In addition, the occurrence of damage to membrane integrity, membrane potential and efflux activity of Lactobacillus strains caused by the lyophilization process with each fruit co-product was evaluated by means of flow cytometry; as well as analysis of the survival of lyophilized strains during 90 days of storage under refrigeration and ambient temperature. The lyophilization process caused a decrease in viable cell counts of all Lactobacillus strains tested, with the greatest reductions for lyophilized L. casei L-26 in the absence of fruit co-products (approximate reduction of 2.9 log CFU / mL). After 48 h of lyophilization, the number of viable cells was higher for lyophilized strains with fruit co-products (7.4 - 8.9 log CFU / mL) when compared to lyophilized strains without substrate or in the presence of fructoligosaccharide. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated the protective effect exerted by fruit co-products tested on Lactobacillus strains, which presented lower subpopulations with damage, mainly in membrane integrity and efflux activity. Lactobacillus strains lyophilized with co-products maintained viability (approximately 2.6-5.3 log CFU / mL) after 90 days storage at room temperature or refrigeration, with counts higher than lyophilized strains without co-products (1-4 log UFC / mL). In general, the greatest protective effects were observed for lyophilized strains in the presence of the acerola co-product (~ 5 log CFU / mL). The protective effects exerted by fruit co-products tested on Lactobacillus strains could be related to the high amounts of sugars, fibers and phenolic compounds present in these materials. These results show the potential of the coproducts of the processing of acerola, cashew and guava as protective substrates for use in the process of lyophilization of probiotic strains of Lactobacillus.
id UFPB_75c43994560d6c02645eebb6467fda25
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufpb.br:123456789/17140
network_acronym_str UFPB
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB
repository_id_str
spelling Efeito protetor de coprodutos do processamento de frutas tropicais em cepas probióticas Lactobacillus após liofilização e armazenamentoFrutasResíduos agroindustriaisPreservaçãoCrioprotetoresLactobacillus sppDanos celularesFruitsAgroindustrial wastePreservationCryoprotectantsLactobacillus sppCell damageFrutas tropicaisCoprodutos agroindustriaisCepas probióticasCNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::NUTRICAOThe production of fruit represents a segment of great importance for the economy, since most of this production is destined to the processing industry for the manufacture of several products, with that, it generates large quantities of co-products agroindustries, these constituted of barks, seeds, bagasse, stalks and other parts of the fruit which contain in their composition simple sugars and non-digestible oligosaccharides, as well as phenolic compounds. It is believed that these co-products can act in the protection of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), such as Lactobacillus, during preservation processes applied in industry, replacing sugars that are generally used, adding value to these coproducts that are commonly discarded in the environment. This study evaluated the protective effect of co-products from the processing of tropical fruits (Malpighia glabra L.), cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) and guava (Psidium guayaba L.) on probiotic strains (Lactobacillus paracasei L-10, L. casei L-26 and L. acidophilus LA-05) after freeze-drying and storage. For this, analyzes of the viability of Lactobacillus strains were performed before and after the lyophilization process in the presence of the tested fruit co-products. In addition, the occurrence of damage to membrane integrity, membrane potential and efflux activity of Lactobacillus strains caused by the lyophilization process with each fruit co-product was evaluated by means of flow cytometry; as well as analysis of the survival of lyophilized strains during 90 days of storage under refrigeration and ambient temperature. The lyophilization process caused a decrease in viable cell counts of all Lactobacillus strains tested, with the greatest reductions for lyophilized L. casei L-26 in the absence of fruit co-products (approximate reduction of 2.9 log CFU / mL). After 48 h of lyophilization, the number of viable cells was higher for lyophilized strains with fruit co-products (7.4 - 8.9 log CFU / mL) when compared to lyophilized strains without substrate or in the presence of fructoligosaccharide. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated the protective effect exerted by fruit co-products tested on Lactobacillus strains, which presented lower subpopulations with damage, mainly in membrane integrity and efflux activity. Lactobacillus strains lyophilized with co-products maintained viability (approximately 2.6-5.3 log CFU / mL) after 90 days storage at room temperature or refrigeration, with counts higher than lyophilized strains without co-products (1-4 log UFC / mL). In general, the greatest protective effects were observed for lyophilized strains in the presence of the acerola co-product (~ 5 log CFU / mL). The protective effects exerted by fruit co-products tested on Lactobacillus strains could be related to the high amounts of sugars, fibers and phenolic compounds present in these materials. These results show the potential of the coproducts of the processing of acerola, cashew and guava as protective substrates for use in the process of lyophilization of probiotic strains of Lactobacillus.NenhumaA produção de frutas representa um segmento de grande importância para a economia, uma vez que a maior parte dessa produção é destinada a indústria de processamento para a fabricação de diversos produtos, com isso, é gerada grandes quantidades de coprodutos agroindústrias, estes constituídos de cascas, sementes, bagaço, talos e outras partes da fruta que apresentam em sua composição açúcares simples e oligossacarídeos não digeríveis, como também compostos fenólicos. Acredita se, que esses coprodutos possam atuar na proteção de bactérias ácido-láticas (BAL) como os Lactobacillus, durante processos de preservação aplicados na indústria, substituindo açúcares que geralmente são utilizados, agregando valor a estes coprodutos que são comumente descartados no meio ambiente. Este estudo avaliou o efeito protetor de coprodutos do processamento das frutas tropicais acerola (Malpighia glabra L.), caju (Anacardium occidentale L.) e goiaba (Psidium guayaba L.) sobre as cepas probióticas (Lactobacillus paracasei L-10, L. casei L-26 e L. acidophillus LA-05) após processo de liofilização e ao longo do armazenamento. Para isso, foram realizadas análises de avaliação da viabilidade das cepas de Lactobacillus antes e após o processo de liofilização na presença dos coprodutos de frutas testados. Além disso, foi avaliada a ocorrência de danos na integridade de membrana, potencial de membrana e atividade de efluxo das cepas de Lactobacillus, causados pelo processo de liofilização com cada coproduto de fruta, por meio de citometria de fluxo; bem como a análise da sobrevivência das cepas liofilizadas durante 90 dias de armazenamento sob temperatura de refrigeração e ambiente. O processo de liofilização causou diminuição das contagens de células viáveis de todas as cepas de Lactobacillus testadas, com maiores reduções para L. casei L-26 liofilizada na ausência dos coprodutos de frutas (redução aproximada de 2,9 log UFC/mL). Após 48 h da liofilização, o número de células viáveis foi maior para as cepas liofilizadas com os coprodutos de frutas (7,4 - 8,9 log UFC/mL) quando comparada as cepas liofilizadas sem substrato ou na presença de frutoligossacarídeo. A análise de citometria de fluxo comprovou o efeito protetor exercido pelos coprodutos de frutas testados sobre as cepas de Lactobacillus, as quais apresentaram menores subpopulações com danos, principalmente na integridade de membrana e atividade de efluxo. As cepas de Lactobacillus liofilizadas com os coprodutos mantiveram a viabilidade (aproximadamente 2,6 - 5,3 log UFC/mL) após 90 dias de armazenamento em temperatura ambiente ou de refrigerção, com contagens superiores às cepas liofilizadas sem coprodutos (1 - 4 log UFC/mL). De forma geral, os maiores efeitos protetores foram observados para as cepas liofilizadas na presença do coproduto de acerola (~ 5 log UFC/mL). Os efeitos protetores exercidos pelos coprodutos de frutas testados sobre as cepas de Lactobacillus poderiam estar relacionados às elevadas quantidades de açúcares, fibras e compostos fenólicos presentes nestes materiais. Esses resultados mostram o potencial de uso dos coprodutos do processamento de acerola, caju e goiaba como substratos protetores para uso no processo de liofilização de cepas probióticas de Lactobacillus.Universidade Federal da ParaíbaBrasilCiências da NutriçãoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da NutriçãoUFPBOliveira, Maria Elieidy Gomes dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1572879054255587Araújo, Caroliny Mesquita2020-03-13T16:57:13Z2019-05-102020-03-13T16:57:13Z2019-04-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesishttps://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/17140porAttribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPBinstname:Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)instacron:UFPB2020-03-14T06:12:57Zoai:repositorio.ufpb.br:123456789/17140Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufpb.br/PUBhttp://tede.biblioteca.ufpb.br:8080/oai/requestdiretoria@ufpb.br|| diretoria@ufpb.bropendoar:2020-03-14T06:12:57Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB - Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efeito protetor de coprodutos do processamento de frutas tropicais em cepas probióticas Lactobacillus após liofilização e armazenamento
title Efeito protetor de coprodutos do processamento de frutas tropicais em cepas probióticas Lactobacillus após liofilização e armazenamento
spellingShingle Efeito protetor de coprodutos do processamento de frutas tropicais em cepas probióticas Lactobacillus após liofilização e armazenamento
Araújo, Caroliny Mesquita
Frutas
Resíduos agroindustriais
Preservação
Crioprotetores
Lactobacillus spp
Danos celulares
Fruits
Agroindustrial waste
Preservation
Cryoprotectants
Lactobacillus spp
Cell damage
Frutas tropicais
Coprodutos agroindustriais
Cepas probióticas
CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::NUTRICAO
title_short Efeito protetor de coprodutos do processamento de frutas tropicais em cepas probióticas Lactobacillus após liofilização e armazenamento
title_full Efeito protetor de coprodutos do processamento de frutas tropicais em cepas probióticas Lactobacillus após liofilização e armazenamento
title_fullStr Efeito protetor de coprodutos do processamento de frutas tropicais em cepas probióticas Lactobacillus após liofilização e armazenamento
title_full_unstemmed Efeito protetor de coprodutos do processamento de frutas tropicais em cepas probióticas Lactobacillus após liofilização e armazenamento
title_sort Efeito protetor de coprodutos do processamento de frutas tropicais em cepas probióticas Lactobacillus após liofilização e armazenamento
author Araújo, Caroliny Mesquita
author_facet Araújo, Caroliny Mesquita
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Maria Elieidy Gomes de
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1572879054255587
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araújo, Caroliny Mesquita
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Frutas
Resíduos agroindustriais
Preservação
Crioprotetores
Lactobacillus spp
Danos celulares
Fruits
Agroindustrial waste
Preservation
Cryoprotectants
Lactobacillus spp
Cell damage
Frutas tropicais
Coprodutos agroindustriais
Cepas probióticas
CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::NUTRICAO
topic Frutas
Resíduos agroindustriais
Preservação
Crioprotetores
Lactobacillus spp
Danos celulares
Fruits
Agroindustrial waste
Preservation
Cryoprotectants
Lactobacillus spp
Cell damage
Frutas tropicais
Coprodutos agroindustriais
Cepas probióticas
CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::NUTRICAO
description The production of fruit represents a segment of great importance for the economy, since most of this production is destined to the processing industry for the manufacture of several products, with that, it generates large quantities of co-products agroindustries, these constituted of barks, seeds, bagasse, stalks and other parts of the fruit which contain in their composition simple sugars and non-digestible oligosaccharides, as well as phenolic compounds. It is believed that these co-products can act in the protection of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), such as Lactobacillus, during preservation processes applied in industry, replacing sugars that are generally used, adding value to these coproducts that are commonly discarded in the environment. This study evaluated the protective effect of co-products from the processing of tropical fruits (Malpighia glabra L.), cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) and guava (Psidium guayaba L.) on probiotic strains (Lactobacillus paracasei L-10, L. casei L-26 and L. acidophilus LA-05) after freeze-drying and storage. For this, analyzes of the viability of Lactobacillus strains were performed before and after the lyophilization process in the presence of the tested fruit co-products. In addition, the occurrence of damage to membrane integrity, membrane potential and efflux activity of Lactobacillus strains caused by the lyophilization process with each fruit co-product was evaluated by means of flow cytometry; as well as analysis of the survival of lyophilized strains during 90 days of storage under refrigeration and ambient temperature. The lyophilization process caused a decrease in viable cell counts of all Lactobacillus strains tested, with the greatest reductions for lyophilized L. casei L-26 in the absence of fruit co-products (approximate reduction of 2.9 log CFU / mL). After 48 h of lyophilization, the number of viable cells was higher for lyophilized strains with fruit co-products (7.4 - 8.9 log CFU / mL) when compared to lyophilized strains without substrate or in the presence of fructoligosaccharide. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated the protective effect exerted by fruit co-products tested on Lactobacillus strains, which presented lower subpopulations with damage, mainly in membrane integrity and efflux activity. Lactobacillus strains lyophilized with co-products maintained viability (approximately 2.6-5.3 log CFU / mL) after 90 days storage at room temperature or refrigeration, with counts higher than lyophilized strains without co-products (1-4 log UFC / mL). In general, the greatest protective effects were observed for lyophilized strains in the presence of the acerola co-product (~ 5 log CFU / mL). The protective effects exerted by fruit co-products tested on Lactobacillus strains could be related to the high amounts of sugars, fibers and phenolic compounds present in these materials. These results show the potential of the coproducts of the processing of acerola, cashew and guava as protective substrates for use in the process of lyophilization of probiotic strains of Lactobacillus.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-10
2019-04-05
2020-03-13T16:57:13Z
2020-03-13T16:57:13Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/17140
url https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/17140
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Brasil
Ciências da Nutrição
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Nutrição
UFPB
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Brasil
Ciências da Nutrição
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Nutrição
UFPB
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB
instname:Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)
instacron:UFPB
instname_str Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)
instacron_str UFPB
institution UFPB
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB - Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv diretoria@ufpb.br|| diretoria@ufpb.br
_version_ 1801842957964279808