Helpful clicks: consumers’ perceived diagnosticity of online book reviews
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Consumer Behavior Review |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/index.php/cbr/article/view/258115 |
Resumo: | This paper investigates online feedback systems and their perceived diagnosticity in the book industry, using a mixed methods approach, with data retrieved from Amazon. Several variables concur to give the overall perceived diagnosticity of customer reviews: score systems, written text and its themes, and reviews date. Even though reviews are positively biased, long negative reviews are perceived as the most diagnostic. The older the review, the higher the perceived diagnosticity, due to the combined effects of early bird bias and winner circle bias. By understanding the role that variables have on diagnosticity, the findings can be used by scholars, as well as by e-commerce and marketplace webmasters who seek ways to improve the feedback systems of the online platforms in or outside the book industry. |
id |
UFPE-5_8d3000a65c02c0204a3174b589ee3362 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.periodicos.ufpe.br:article/258115 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPE-5 |
network_name_str |
Consumer Behavior Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Helpful clicks: consumers’ perceived diagnosticity of online book reviewsdiagnosticityonline feedback systemsbook industrycultural consumptionelectronic word-of-mouthThis paper investigates online feedback systems and their perceived diagnosticity in the book industry, using a mixed methods approach, with data retrieved from Amazon. Several variables concur to give the overall perceived diagnosticity of customer reviews: score systems, written text and its themes, and reviews date. Even though reviews are positively biased, long negative reviews are perceived as the most diagnostic. The older the review, the higher the perceived diagnosticity, due to the combined effects of early bird bias and winner circle bias. By understanding the role that variables have on diagnosticity, the findings can be used by scholars, as well as by e-commerce and marketplace webmasters who seek ways to improve the feedback systems of the online platforms in or outside the book industry.Universidade Federal de Pernambuco2024-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionQuantitative and qualitative mixed method.application/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/index.php/cbr/article/view/25811510.51359/2526-7884.2024.258115CBR - Consumer Behavior Review; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): january-december; 1-18CBR - Consumer Behavior Review; v. 8 n. 1 (2024): january-december; 1-182526-7884reponame:Consumer Behavior Reviewinstname:Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)instacron:UFPEenghttps://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/index.php/cbr/article/view/258115/46412Copyright (c) 2024 CBR - Consumer Behavior Reviewhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPiva, BeatriceMarques, Lénia2024-04-15T13:46:15Zoai:oai.periodicos.ufpe.br:article/258115Revistahttps://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/cbrPUBhttps://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/cbr/oaicbr@ufpe.br||periodicos.ufpe@ufpe.br2526-78842526-7884opendoar:2024-04-15T13:46:15Consumer Behavior Review - Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Helpful clicks: consumers’ perceived diagnosticity of online book reviews |
title |
Helpful clicks: consumers’ perceived diagnosticity of online book reviews |
spellingShingle |
Helpful clicks: consumers’ perceived diagnosticity of online book reviews Piva, Beatrice diagnosticity online feedback systems book industry cultural consumption electronic word-of-mouth |
title_short |
Helpful clicks: consumers’ perceived diagnosticity of online book reviews |
title_full |
Helpful clicks: consumers’ perceived diagnosticity of online book reviews |
title_fullStr |
Helpful clicks: consumers’ perceived diagnosticity of online book reviews |
title_full_unstemmed |
Helpful clicks: consumers’ perceived diagnosticity of online book reviews |
title_sort |
Helpful clicks: consumers’ perceived diagnosticity of online book reviews |
author |
Piva, Beatrice |
author_facet |
Piva, Beatrice Marques, Lénia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Marques, Lénia |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Piva, Beatrice Marques, Lénia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
diagnosticity online feedback systems book industry cultural consumption electronic word-of-mouth |
topic |
diagnosticity online feedback systems book industry cultural consumption electronic word-of-mouth |
description |
This paper investigates online feedback systems and their perceived diagnosticity in the book industry, using a mixed methods approach, with data retrieved from Amazon. Several variables concur to give the overall perceived diagnosticity of customer reviews: score systems, written text and its themes, and reviews date. Even though reviews are positively biased, long negative reviews are perceived as the most diagnostic. The older the review, the higher the perceived diagnosticity, due to the combined effects of early bird bias and winner circle bias. By understanding the role that variables have on diagnosticity, the findings can be used by scholars, as well as by e-commerce and marketplace webmasters who seek ways to improve the feedback systems of the online platforms in or outside the book industry. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-04-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Quantitative and qualitative mixed method. |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/index.php/cbr/article/view/258115 10.51359/2526-7884.2024.258115 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/index.php/cbr/article/view/258115 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.51359/2526-7884.2024.258115 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/index.php/cbr/article/view/258115/46412 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 CBR - Consumer Behavior Review https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 CBR - Consumer Behavior Review https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
CBR - Consumer Behavior Review; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): january-december; 1-18 CBR - Consumer Behavior Review; v. 8 n. 1 (2024): january-december; 1-18 2526-7884 reponame:Consumer Behavior Review instname:Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) instacron:UFPE |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) |
instacron_str |
UFPE |
institution |
UFPE |
reponame_str |
Consumer Behavior Review |
collection |
Consumer Behavior Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Consumer Behavior Review - Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cbr@ufpe.br||periodicos.ufpe@ufpe.br |
_version_ |
1797220396146098176 |