CROCE, GRAMSCI AND THE “AUTONOMY OF POLITICS”

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bianchi, Álvaro
Data de Publicação: 2007
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Sociologia e Política
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/rsp/article/view/13686
Resumo: Within the reflections that Gramsci developed in his Quaderni del carcere, the theme of the autonomyof the political occupies a key position. It was on the basis of these reflections that Gramsci carriedout his research regarding politics and the possibility of a Political Science. According to BenedettoCroce, Nicolas Machiavel can be credited as the first theorist to have asserted the autonomy ofpolitics. For Croce, it is this autonomy that makes it possible to establish a radical distinction betweenethics and politics and between “political philosophy” and the “empirical science of politics”. Gramscimakes critical use of Croce’s reflections as his point of departure in his reading of Machiavel.Recognition of the autonomy of the political implies that the the latter cannot be reduced to religionnor ethics. As fields of knowledge and as activities, Political Science and politics had their own rules,distinguishing themselves from other forms of knowledge and human activity. Yet for the Sardinian Marxist, “autonomy” was not meant to imply a radical separation between politics and morality.
id UFPR-10_762349f3d5657b63320e275318e6251d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/13686
network_acronym_str UFPR-10
network_name_str Revista de Sociologia e Política
repository_id_str
spelling CROCE, GRAMSCI AND THE “AUTONOMY OF POLITICS”CROCE, GRAMSCI ET “L’AUTONOMIE DE LA POLITIQUE”CROCE, GRAMSCI E A “AUTONOMIA DA POLÍTICA”Gramsci; Croce; Maquiavel; autonomie de la politique; autonomia da política; ciência; filosofia; the autonomy of politicsWithin the reflections that Gramsci developed in his Quaderni del carcere, the theme of the autonomyof the political occupies a key position. It was on the basis of these reflections that Gramsci carriedout his research regarding politics and the possibility of a Political Science. According to BenedettoCroce, Nicolas Machiavel can be credited as the first theorist to have asserted the autonomy ofpolitics. For Croce, it is this autonomy that makes it possible to establish a radical distinction betweenethics and politics and between “political philosophy” and the “empirical science of politics”. Gramscimakes critical use of Croce’s reflections as his point of departure in his reading of Machiavel.Recognition of the autonomy of the political implies that the the latter cannot be reduced to religionnor ethics. As fields of knowledge and as activities, Political Science and politics had their own rules,distinguishing themselves from other forms of knowledge and human activity. Yet for the Sardinian Marxist, “autonomy” was not meant to imply a radical separation between politics and morality.Dans la réflexion que Gramsci présente dans les Quaderni del carcere, le thème de l’autonomie dela politique prend une place importante. C’est sur cette réflexion que Gramsci a mené sa rechercheconcernant la politique et la possibilitié d’une science politique. Selon Benedetto Croce, il revient àNicolas Machiavel le mérite d’avoir affirmé pour la première fois l’autonomie de la politique. PourCroce, cette autonomie permettait d’établir une distinction radicale entre éthique et politique et entre« philosophie de la politique » et « science empirique de la politique ». Gramsci a critiquement utiliséla réflexion de Croce, point de départ de sa lecture de Machiavel. La reconnaissance de l’autonomie de la politique impliquait que celle-ci ne saurait se réduire à la religion ou à l’éthique. En tant quedomaine de connaissance et en tant qu’activités, la Science Politique et la politique avaient leurspropres règles, ce qui les différenciaient d’autres formes de connaissance et d’activité humaine.Néanmoins cette « autonomie » ne signifiait pas pour le marxiste sarde une séparation radicale entrepolitique et morale. C’est pour cette raison que Gramsci trouvait chez Machiavel un précurseur de laphilosophie de la praxis à plein sens, c’est-à-dire le créateur d’une « science-action-révolutionaire ».Na reflexão que Gramsci desenvolveu nos Quaderni del carcere, o tema da autonomia da política ocupa umaimportante posição. Foi com base nessa reflexão que Gramsci desenvolveu sua pesquisa a respeito depolítica e da possibilidade de uma ciência política. Segundo Benedetto Croce, cabia a Nicolau Maquiavelo mérito de ter afirmado pela primeira vez a autonomia da política. Para Croce, essa autonomia permitiaestabelecer uma distinção radical entre ética e política e entre “filosofia da política” e “ciência empíricada política”. Gramsci tomou criticamente a reflexão croceana como ponto de partida de sua leitura deMaquiavel. O reconhecimento da autonomia da política implicava que esta não poderia ser reduzida àreligião ou à ética. Como campo do conhecimento e como atividade, a ciência política e a política tinhamregras próprias, que as distinguiam de outras formas do conhecimento e da atividade humana. Mas tal“autonomia” não implicava, para o marxista sardo, uma separação radical entre política e moral. Por essarazão, Gramsci encontrava em Maquiavel um precursor da filosofia da práxis em sentido pleno, ou seja, ocriador de uma “ciência-ação revolucionária”.UFPR2007-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rsp/article/view/13686Revista de Sociologia e Política; n. 29 (2007)1678-98730104-4478reponame:Revista de Sociologia e Políticainstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rsp/article/view/13686/9227Bianchi, Álvaroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2009-03-25T22:18:28Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/13686Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rspPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rsp/oai||editoriarsp@ufpr.br1678-98730104-4478opendoar:2009-03-25T22:18:28Revista de Sociologia e Política - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CROCE, GRAMSCI AND THE “AUTONOMY OF POLITICS”
CROCE, GRAMSCI ET “L’AUTONOMIE DE LA POLITIQUE”
CROCE, GRAMSCI E A “AUTONOMIA DA POLÍTICA”
title CROCE, GRAMSCI AND THE “AUTONOMY OF POLITICS”
spellingShingle CROCE, GRAMSCI AND THE “AUTONOMY OF POLITICS”
Bianchi, Álvaro
Gramsci; Croce; Maquiavel; autonomie de la politique; autonomia da política; ciência; filosofia; the autonomy of politics
title_short CROCE, GRAMSCI AND THE “AUTONOMY OF POLITICS”
title_full CROCE, GRAMSCI AND THE “AUTONOMY OF POLITICS”
title_fullStr CROCE, GRAMSCI AND THE “AUTONOMY OF POLITICS”
title_full_unstemmed CROCE, GRAMSCI AND THE “AUTONOMY OF POLITICS”
title_sort CROCE, GRAMSCI AND THE “AUTONOMY OF POLITICS”
author Bianchi, Álvaro
author_facet Bianchi, Álvaro
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bianchi, Álvaro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gramsci; Croce; Maquiavel; autonomie de la politique; autonomia da política; ciência; filosofia; the autonomy of politics
topic Gramsci; Croce; Maquiavel; autonomie de la politique; autonomia da política; ciência; filosofia; the autonomy of politics
description Within the reflections that Gramsci developed in his Quaderni del carcere, the theme of the autonomyof the political occupies a key position. It was on the basis of these reflections that Gramsci carriedout his research regarding politics and the possibility of a Political Science. According to BenedettoCroce, Nicolas Machiavel can be credited as the first theorist to have asserted the autonomy ofpolitics. For Croce, it is this autonomy that makes it possible to establish a radical distinction betweenethics and politics and between “political philosophy” and the “empirical science of politics”. Gramscimakes critical use of Croce’s reflections as his point of departure in his reading of Machiavel.Recognition of the autonomy of the political implies that the the latter cannot be reduced to religionnor ethics. As fields of knowledge and as activities, Political Science and politics had their own rules,distinguishing themselves from other forms of knowledge and human activity. Yet for the Sardinian Marxist, “autonomy” was not meant to imply a radical separation between politics and morality.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-11-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/rsp/article/view/13686
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/rsp/article/view/13686
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/rsp/article/view/13686/9227
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFPR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFPR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Sociologia e Política; n. 29 (2007)
1678-9873
0104-4478
reponame:Revista de Sociologia e Política
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Revista de Sociologia e Política
collection Revista de Sociologia e Política
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Sociologia e Política - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||editoriarsp@ufpr.br
_version_ 1799761025001586689