Oral ability components: an analysis of analytic item indexes at Celpe-Bras exam
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1673 |
Resumo: | Large scale tests are frequently under a challenge as they have to inform what is being tested and also argue about their social accountability. In this paper, I discuss how the oral ability components are being evaluated by the rater avaliador-observador at the Celpe-bras exam. The analytic rubric was combined by the following features or items: comprehension, interactional competence, fluency, lexical adequacy, grammatical adequacy and pronunciation. The aim of this paper is to study the items properties in line with the rubrics descriptions and tasks. The analyses of the item difficulty index and the item discrimination index were made in the light of Bachman’s (1990) model of communicative language ability and was calculated using Rasch’s Partial Credit Model. One-thousand examinees’ scores were analyzed from the first oral exam edition of 2016. Item analysis endorses the idea that tasks influence the way components interact. By analyzing the items indexes, I argue that linguistic competence is more important to place examinees at the higher proficiency bands compared to the strategic competence related items. I also discuss that comprehension may be a requirement for the examinee to develop oral performance at the Celpe-Bras oral exam. |
id |
UFPR-12_1f5140d52907e2061cdcf777632d876d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1673 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-12 |
network_name_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Oral ability components: an analysis of analytic item indexes at Celpe-Bras exam Componentes da habilidade oral: uma análise das propriedades dos itens analíticos do exame Celpe-BrasProficiência oralCelpe-brasTeoria de resposta ao itemOral proficiencyCelpe-BrasItem response theoryLarge scale tests are frequently under a challenge as they have to inform what is being tested and also argue about their social accountability. In this paper, I discuss how the oral ability components are being evaluated by the rater avaliador-observador at the Celpe-bras exam. The analytic rubric was combined by the following features or items: comprehension, interactional competence, fluency, lexical adequacy, grammatical adequacy and pronunciation. The aim of this paper is to study the items properties in line with the rubrics descriptions and tasks. The analyses of the item difficulty index and the item discrimination index were made in the light of Bachman’s (1990) model of communicative language ability and was calculated using Rasch’s Partial Credit Model. One-thousand examinees’ scores were analyzed from the first oral exam edition of 2016. Item analysis endorses the idea that tasks influence the way components interact. By analyzing the items indexes, I argue that linguistic competence is more important to place examinees at the higher proficiency bands compared to the strategic competence related items. I also discuss that comprehension may be a requirement for the examinee to develop oral performance at the Celpe-Bras oral exam.As avaliações externas são constantemente desafiadas a informar exatamente o que o teste avalia e a pertinência do uso de seus resultados. Neste trabalho, discuto como os subcomponentes da habilidade oral do Celpe-bras interagem para construção da nota do avaliador-observador. A escala é compostas pelos seguintes itens: compreensão, competência interacional, fluência, adequação lexical, adequação gramatical e pronúncia. Com o objetivo de estudar as propriedades desses itens e relacioná-las aos descritores da grade e à tarefa de avaliação oral, apresentei uma análise das medidas de dificuldade e discriminação de cada um dos itens, apoiando-me no modelo da habilidade comunicativa da linguagem de Bachman (1990). O modelo Rasch básico na extensão Partial Credit Model foi utilizado para a análise dos itens. O corpus é composto por notas de 1.000 participantes da primeira edição de 2016. Após a análise, argumento que a tarefa interfere na forma como os subcomponentes da habilidade linguística interagem. Além disso, os dados sugerem que a competência linguística seja mais determinante para classificar os examinandos nas faixas mais elevadas do exame do que os subcomponentes da competência estratégica, e ainda, que a compreensão seja um requisito para o examinando demonstrar um desempenho adequado nas faixas de classificação do exame.Associação Brasileira de Linguística2020-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextoapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/167310.25189/rabralin.v19i3.1673Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 3 (2020); 799-824Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 3 (2020); 799-8240102-715810.25189/rabralin.v19i3reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1673/1874https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1673/2083Copyright (c) 2020 Laura Marcia Luiza Ferreirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira, Laura Marcia Luiza2021-03-15T13:34:35Zoai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1673Revistahttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralinPUBhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/oairkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org2178-76031678-1805opendoar:2021-03-15T13:34:35Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Oral ability components: an analysis of analytic item indexes at Celpe-Bras exam Componentes da habilidade oral: uma análise das propriedades dos itens analíticos do exame Celpe-Bras |
title |
Oral ability components: an analysis of analytic item indexes at Celpe-Bras exam |
spellingShingle |
Oral ability components: an analysis of analytic item indexes at Celpe-Bras exam Ferreira, Laura Marcia Luiza Proficiência oral Celpe-bras Teoria de resposta ao item Oral proficiency Celpe-Bras Item response theory |
title_short |
Oral ability components: an analysis of analytic item indexes at Celpe-Bras exam |
title_full |
Oral ability components: an analysis of analytic item indexes at Celpe-Bras exam |
title_fullStr |
Oral ability components: an analysis of analytic item indexes at Celpe-Bras exam |
title_full_unstemmed |
Oral ability components: an analysis of analytic item indexes at Celpe-Bras exam |
title_sort |
Oral ability components: an analysis of analytic item indexes at Celpe-Bras exam |
author |
Ferreira, Laura Marcia Luiza |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Laura Marcia Luiza |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Laura Marcia Luiza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Proficiência oral Celpe-bras Teoria de resposta ao item Oral proficiency Celpe-Bras Item response theory |
topic |
Proficiência oral Celpe-bras Teoria de resposta ao item Oral proficiency Celpe-Bras Item response theory |
description |
Large scale tests are frequently under a challenge as they have to inform what is being tested and also argue about their social accountability. In this paper, I discuss how the oral ability components are being evaluated by the rater avaliador-observador at the Celpe-bras exam. The analytic rubric was combined by the following features or items: comprehension, interactional competence, fluency, lexical adequacy, grammatical adequacy and pronunciation. The aim of this paper is to study the items properties in line with the rubrics descriptions and tasks. The analyses of the item difficulty index and the item discrimination index were made in the light of Bachman’s (1990) model of communicative language ability and was calculated using Rasch’s Partial Credit Model. One-thousand examinees’ scores were analyzed from the first oral exam edition of 2016. Item analysis endorses the idea that tasks influence the way components interact. By analyzing the items indexes, I argue that linguistic competence is more important to place examinees at the higher proficiency bands compared to the strategic competence related items. I also discuss that comprehension may be a requirement for the examinee to develop oral performance at the Celpe-Bras oral exam. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1673 10.25189/rabralin.v19i3.1673 |
url |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1673 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.25189/rabralin.v19i3.1673 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1673/1874 https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1673/2083 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Laura Marcia Luiza Ferreira info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Laura Marcia Luiza Ferreira |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 3 (2020); 799-824 Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 3 (2020); 799-824 0102-7158 10.25189/rabralin.v19i3 reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
collection |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org |
_version_ |
1798329771264835584 |