Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gonçalves, Eliana Correia Brandão
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1772
Resumo: This text proposes a theoretical analysis and the historical and socio-cultural practices of writing, based on the Discursive Tradition model and on the philological-linguistic practice. Requirements on Bahia, produced in the 18th century, within the scope of Public Administration of the former Overseas Council, will be analyzed. Philology promotes the retrieval and reconfiguration of linguistic data in editions of eighteenth-century institutional texts, considering the modes of production of the agents of writing. When producing a legal-administrative text in Portuguese America, it was necessary for the clerk to know well the system of what we today call Discursive Tradition. In other words, it was necessary to know the ways of saying that govern the organization of this type of textual construction, marked by mandatory formulas and lexical units that are articulated in the text. Therefore, based on the Discursive Traditions model, certain regularities and linguistic variations can be noticed in this textual genre. In this way, the theoretical anchoring of this work is based on the studies of the Discursive Tradition model (COSERIU, 1979; SCHLIBEN-LANGE, 1993; SCHMIDT-RIESE, 2010; KABATEK, 2004; 2006; 2012) and Philology (CAMBRAIA, 2005; MARQUILHAS, 2000; GONÇALVES, 2017; 2018; 2019). Finally, the Requirements record information and requests, based on legal acts or jurisprudence, presenting themselves as relevant instruments in requesting petitions from the population to public authorities.
id UFPR-12_4d712c2bfa9881cf491fbf0dac99b5ed
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1772
network_acronym_str UFPR-12
network_name_str Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th centuryTradição Discursiva, Filologia e Corpus Histórico-Diacrônico: análise de Requerimentos do século XVIIITradição DiscursivaFilologiaHistoricidade TextualRequerimentosCorpus Histórico-DiacrônicoDiscursive TraditionPhilologyTextual HistoricityRequirementsHistorical-Diachronic CorpusThis text proposes a theoretical analysis and the historical and socio-cultural practices of writing, based on the Discursive Tradition model and on the philological-linguistic practice. Requirements on Bahia, produced in the 18th century, within the scope of Public Administration of the former Overseas Council, will be analyzed. Philology promotes the retrieval and reconfiguration of linguistic data in editions of eighteenth-century institutional texts, considering the modes of production of the agents of writing. When producing a legal-administrative text in Portuguese America, it was necessary for the clerk to know well the system of what we today call Discursive Tradition. In other words, it was necessary to know the ways of saying that govern the organization of this type of textual construction, marked by mandatory formulas and lexical units that are articulated in the text. Therefore, based on the Discursive Traditions model, certain regularities and linguistic variations can be noticed in this textual genre. In this way, the theoretical anchoring of this work is based on the studies of the Discursive Tradition model (COSERIU, 1979; SCHLIBEN-LANGE, 1993; SCHMIDT-RIESE, 2010; KABATEK, 2004; 2006; 2012) and Philology (CAMBRAIA, 2005; MARQUILHAS, 2000; GONÇALVES, 2017; 2018; 2019). Finally, the Requirements record information and requests, based on legal acts or jurisprudence, presenting themselves as relevant instruments in requesting petitions from the population to public authorities.Este texto propõe uma análise teórica e das práticas históricas e socioculturais da escrita, com base no modelo de Tradição Discursiva e na prática filológico-linguística. Serão analisados Requerimentos sobre a Bahia, produzidos no século XVIII, no âmbito da Administração Pública do antigo Conselho Ultramarino. A Filologia promove o resgate e a reconfiguração de dados linguísticos em edições de textos institucionais setecentistas, considerando os modos de produção dos agentes da escrita. Ao se produzir um texto jurídico-administrativo na América Portuguesa, era preciso que o escrevente conhecesse bem o sistema do que nós chamamos hoje de Tradição Discursiva. Em outras palavras, era necessário conhecer os modos de dizer que regem a organização desse tipo de construção textual, marcado por fórmulas obrigatórias e unidades lexicais que se articulam no texto. Portanto, partindo do modelo de Tradições Discursivas, podem ser notadas certas regularidades e variações linguísticas nesse gênero textual. Nesse caminho, a ancoragem teórica deste trabalho fundamenta-se nos estudos do modelo de Tradição Discursiva (COSERIU, 1979; SCHLIBEN-LANGE, 1993; SCHMIDT-RIESE, 2010; KABATEK, 2004; 2006; 2012) e da Filologia (CAMBRAIA, 2005; MARQUILHAS, 2000; GONÇALVES, 2017; 2018; 2019). Por fim, os Requerimentos registram informações e pedidos, com base em atos legais ou de jurisprudência, apresentando-se como instrumentos relevantes na solicitação de petições da população às autoridades públicas.Associação Brasileira de Linguística2020-12-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionDossiê TemáticoTextoapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/177210.25189/rabralin.v19i3.1772Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 3 (2020); 582-598Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 3 (2020); 582-5980102-715810.25189/rabralin.v19i3reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1772/1943https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1772/2072Copyright (c) 2020 Eliana Correia Brandão Gonçalvesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonçalves, Eliana Correia Brandão2021-03-04T12:43:00Zoai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1772Revistahttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralinPUBhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/oairkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org2178-76031678-1805opendoar:2021-03-04T12:43Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century
Tradição Discursiva, Filologia e Corpus Histórico-Diacrônico: análise de Requerimentos do século XVIII
title Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century
spellingShingle Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century
Gonçalves, Eliana Correia Brandão
Tradição Discursiva
Filologia
Historicidade Textual
Requerimentos
Corpus Histórico-Diacrônico
Discursive Tradition
Philology
Textual Historicity
Requirements
Historical-Diachronic Corpus
title_short Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century
title_full Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century
title_fullStr Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century
title_full_unstemmed Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century
title_sort Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century
author Gonçalves, Eliana Correia Brandão
author_facet Gonçalves, Eliana Correia Brandão
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonçalves, Eliana Correia Brandão
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tradição Discursiva
Filologia
Historicidade Textual
Requerimentos
Corpus Histórico-Diacrônico
Discursive Tradition
Philology
Textual Historicity
Requirements
Historical-Diachronic Corpus
topic Tradição Discursiva
Filologia
Historicidade Textual
Requerimentos
Corpus Histórico-Diacrônico
Discursive Tradition
Philology
Textual Historicity
Requirements
Historical-Diachronic Corpus
description This text proposes a theoretical analysis and the historical and socio-cultural practices of writing, based on the Discursive Tradition model and on the philological-linguistic practice. Requirements on Bahia, produced in the 18th century, within the scope of Public Administration of the former Overseas Council, will be analyzed. Philology promotes the retrieval and reconfiguration of linguistic data in editions of eighteenth-century institutional texts, considering the modes of production of the agents of writing. When producing a legal-administrative text in Portuguese America, it was necessary for the clerk to know well the system of what we today call Discursive Tradition. In other words, it was necessary to know the ways of saying that govern the organization of this type of textual construction, marked by mandatory formulas and lexical units that are articulated in the text. Therefore, based on the Discursive Traditions model, certain regularities and linguistic variations can be noticed in this textual genre. In this way, the theoretical anchoring of this work is based on the studies of the Discursive Tradition model (COSERIU, 1979; SCHLIBEN-LANGE, 1993; SCHMIDT-RIESE, 2010; KABATEK, 2004; 2006; 2012) and Philology (CAMBRAIA, 2005; MARQUILHAS, 2000; GONÇALVES, 2017; 2018; 2019). Finally, the Requirements record information and requests, based on legal acts or jurisprudence, presenting themselves as relevant instruments in requesting petitions from the population to public authorities.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Dossiê Temático
Texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1772
10.25189/rabralin.v19i3.1772
url https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1772
identifier_str_mv 10.25189/rabralin.v19i3.1772
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1772/1943
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1772/2072
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Eliana Correia Brandão Gonçalves
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Eliana Correia Brandão Gonçalves
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Linguística
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Linguística
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 3 (2020); 582-598
Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 3 (2020); 582-598
0102-7158
10.25189/rabralin.v19i3
reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
collection Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org
_version_ 1798329771390664704