Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1772 |
Resumo: | This text proposes a theoretical analysis and the historical and socio-cultural practices of writing, based on the Discursive Tradition model and on the philological-linguistic practice. Requirements on Bahia, produced in the 18th century, within the scope of Public Administration of the former Overseas Council, will be analyzed. Philology promotes the retrieval and reconfiguration of linguistic data in editions of eighteenth-century institutional texts, considering the modes of production of the agents of writing. When producing a legal-administrative text in Portuguese America, it was necessary for the clerk to know well the system of what we today call Discursive Tradition. In other words, it was necessary to know the ways of saying that govern the organization of this type of textual construction, marked by mandatory formulas and lexical units that are articulated in the text. Therefore, based on the Discursive Traditions model, certain regularities and linguistic variations can be noticed in this textual genre. In this way, the theoretical anchoring of this work is based on the studies of the Discursive Tradition model (COSERIU, 1979; SCHLIBEN-LANGE, 1993; SCHMIDT-RIESE, 2010; KABATEK, 2004; 2006; 2012) and Philology (CAMBRAIA, 2005; MARQUILHAS, 2000; GONÇALVES, 2017; 2018; 2019). Finally, the Requirements record information and requests, based on legal acts or jurisprudence, presenting themselves as relevant instruments in requesting petitions from the population to public authorities. |
id |
UFPR-12_4d712c2bfa9881cf491fbf0dac99b5ed |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1772 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-12 |
network_name_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th centuryTradição Discursiva, Filologia e Corpus Histórico-Diacrônico: análise de Requerimentos do século XVIIITradição DiscursivaFilologiaHistoricidade TextualRequerimentosCorpus Histórico-DiacrônicoDiscursive TraditionPhilologyTextual HistoricityRequirementsHistorical-Diachronic CorpusThis text proposes a theoretical analysis and the historical and socio-cultural practices of writing, based on the Discursive Tradition model and on the philological-linguistic practice. Requirements on Bahia, produced in the 18th century, within the scope of Public Administration of the former Overseas Council, will be analyzed. Philology promotes the retrieval and reconfiguration of linguistic data in editions of eighteenth-century institutional texts, considering the modes of production of the agents of writing. When producing a legal-administrative text in Portuguese America, it was necessary for the clerk to know well the system of what we today call Discursive Tradition. In other words, it was necessary to know the ways of saying that govern the organization of this type of textual construction, marked by mandatory formulas and lexical units that are articulated in the text. Therefore, based on the Discursive Traditions model, certain regularities and linguistic variations can be noticed in this textual genre. In this way, the theoretical anchoring of this work is based on the studies of the Discursive Tradition model (COSERIU, 1979; SCHLIBEN-LANGE, 1993; SCHMIDT-RIESE, 2010; KABATEK, 2004; 2006; 2012) and Philology (CAMBRAIA, 2005; MARQUILHAS, 2000; GONÇALVES, 2017; 2018; 2019). Finally, the Requirements record information and requests, based on legal acts or jurisprudence, presenting themselves as relevant instruments in requesting petitions from the population to public authorities.Este texto propõe uma análise teórica e das práticas históricas e socioculturais da escrita, com base no modelo de Tradição Discursiva e na prática filológico-linguística. Serão analisados Requerimentos sobre a Bahia, produzidos no século XVIII, no âmbito da Administração Pública do antigo Conselho Ultramarino. A Filologia promove o resgate e a reconfiguração de dados linguísticos em edições de textos institucionais setecentistas, considerando os modos de produção dos agentes da escrita. Ao se produzir um texto jurídico-administrativo na América Portuguesa, era preciso que o escrevente conhecesse bem o sistema do que nós chamamos hoje de Tradição Discursiva. Em outras palavras, era necessário conhecer os modos de dizer que regem a organização desse tipo de construção textual, marcado por fórmulas obrigatórias e unidades lexicais que se articulam no texto. Portanto, partindo do modelo de Tradições Discursivas, podem ser notadas certas regularidades e variações linguísticas nesse gênero textual. Nesse caminho, a ancoragem teórica deste trabalho fundamenta-se nos estudos do modelo de Tradição Discursiva (COSERIU, 1979; SCHLIBEN-LANGE, 1993; SCHMIDT-RIESE, 2010; KABATEK, 2004; 2006; 2012) e da Filologia (CAMBRAIA, 2005; MARQUILHAS, 2000; GONÇALVES, 2017; 2018; 2019). Por fim, os Requerimentos registram informações e pedidos, com base em atos legais ou de jurisprudência, apresentando-se como instrumentos relevantes na solicitação de petições da população às autoridades públicas.Associação Brasileira de Linguística2020-12-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionDossiê TemáticoTextoapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/177210.25189/rabralin.v19i3.1772Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 3 (2020); 582-598Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 3 (2020); 582-5980102-715810.25189/rabralin.v19i3reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1772/1943https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1772/2072Copyright (c) 2020 Eliana Correia Brandão Gonçalvesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonçalves, Eliana Correia Brandão2021-03-04T12:43:00Zoai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1772Revistahttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralinPUBhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/oairkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org2178-76031678-1805opendoar:2021-03-04T12:43Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century Tradição Discursiva, Filologia e Corpus Histórico-Diacrônico: análise de Requerimentos do século XVIII |
title |
Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century |
spellingShingle |
Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century Gonçalves, Eliana Correia Brandão Tradição Discursiva Filologia Historicidade Textual Requerimentos Corpus Histórico-Diacrônico Discursive Tradition Philology Textual Historicity Requirements Historical-Diachronic Corpus |
title_short |
Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century |
title_full |
Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century |
title_fullStr |
Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century |
title_full_unstemmed |
Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century |
title_sort |
Discursive Tradition, Philology and Historical-Diachronic Corpus: Requirements analysis of the 18th century |
author |
Gonçalves, Eliana Correia Brandão |
author_facet |
Gonçalves, Eliana Correia Brandão |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gonçalves, Eliana Correia Brandão |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Tradição Discursiva Filologia Historicidade Textual Requerimentos Corpus Histórico-Diacrônico Discursive Tradition Philology Textual Historicity Requirements Historical-Diachronic Corpus |
topic |
Tradição Discursiva Filologia Historicidade Textual Requerimentos Corpus Histórico-Diacrônico Discursive Tradition Philology Textual Historicity Requirements Historical-Diachronic Corpus |
description |
This text proposes a theoretical analysis and the historical and socio-cultural practices of writing, based on the Discursive Tradition model and on the philological-linguistic practice. Requirements on Bahia, produced in the 18th century, within the scope of Public Administration of the former Overseas Council, will be analyzed. Philology promotes the retrieval and reconfiguration of linguistic data in editions of eighteenth-century institutional texts, considering the modes of production of the agents of writing. When producing a legal-administrative text in Portuguese America, it was necessary for the clerk to know well the system of what we today call Discursive Tradition. In other words, it was necessary to know the ways of saying that govern the organization of this type of textual construction, marked by mandatory formulas and lexical units that are articulated in the text. Therefore, based on the Discursive Traditions model, certain regularities and linguistic variations can be noticed in this textual genre. In this way, the theoretical anchoring of this work is based on the studies of the Discursive Tradition model (COSERIU, 1979; SCHLIBEN-LANGE, 1993; SCHMIDT-RIESE, 2010; KABATEK, 2004; 2006; 2012) and Philology (CAMBRAIA, 2005; MARQUILHAS, 2000; GONÇALVES, 2017; 2018; 2019). Finally, the Requirements record information and requests, based on legal acts or jurisprudence, presenting themselves as relevant instruments in requesting petitions from the population to public authorities. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dossiê Temático Texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1772 10.25189/rabralin.v19i3.1772 |
url |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1772 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.25189/rabralin.v19i3.1772 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1772/1943 https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1772/2072 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Eliana Correia Brandão Gonçalves info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Eliana Correia Brandão Gonçalves |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 3 (2020); 582-598 Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 3 (2020); 582-598 0102-7158 10.25189/rabralin.v19i3 reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
collection |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org |
_version_ |
1798329771390664704 |