Dialogical constitutionalism manifestations in the Brazilian judicial review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Investigações Constitucionais |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/40515 |
Resumo: | The exponential growth in judicial review in Brazil, compared with the international scenery, is not out of tune – and it has a direct relation with many Brazilian constitutional features. An analytical text (with over 400 articles) and a large spectrum of fundamental rights, provide an ambience that favors highly intense controversy about State obligations in providing goods and public services, or even about the possible tensions that may arise between those same rights. The Brazilian Supreme Court faces that unmanageable number of lawsuits, notably related with claims regarding the non-granting of socioeconomic rights. That scenery is leading the Brazilian Supreme Court to some kind of experimentalism in the designing of its own rulings, applying techniques that can be easily associated with many manifestations of the so-called dialogical constitutionalism. All those experiences reveal that granting socioeconomic rights as a distributive justice goal requires a dialogic strategy in judicial review, in order to provide progressive implementation, preventing inequality. Still, those dialogic provisions face serious obstacles related with the menace of a merely symbolic use by the Judiciary and with a path of substitutive deliberation again by the Judiciary leading to reinforce Legislative inertia, social alienation from the debate and undermining democratic accountability. Adopting a dialogical constitutionalism model in Brazil might be a proper solution to allow its system to reach the functional development of the constitution’s goals – but it requires a deeper theoretical reflection. |
id |
UFPR-14_970d01cbee2b2d12c8ff9d49668f3a2e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/40515 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-14 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Dialogical constitutionalism manifestations in the Brazilian judicial reviewDireito; Direito ConstitucionalThe exponential growth in judicial review in Brazil, compared with the international scenery, is not out of tune – and it has a direct relation with many Brazilian constitutional features. An analytical text (with over 400 articles) and a large spectrum of fundamental rights, provide an ambience that favors highly intense controversy about State obligations in providing goods and public services, or even about the possible tensions that may arise between those same rights. The Brazilian Supreme Court faces that unmanageable number of lawsuits, notably related with claims regarding the non-granting of socioeconomic rights. That scenery is leading the Brazilian Supreme Court to some kind of experimentalism in the designing of its own rulings, applying techniques that can be easily associated with many manifestations of the so-called dialogical constitutionalism. All those experiences reveal that granting socioeconomic rights as a distributive justice goal requires a dialogic strategy in judicial review, in order to provide progressive implementation, preventing inequality. Still, those dialogic provisions face serious obstacles related with the menace of a merely symbolic use by the Judiciary and with a path of substitutive deliberation again by the Judiciary leading to reinforce Legislative inertia, social alienation from the debate and undermining democratic accountability. Adopting a dialogical constitutionalism model in Brazil might be a proper solution to allow its system to reach the functional development of the constitution’s goals – but it requires a deeper theoretical reflection.NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPRValle, Vanice Regina Lírio do2014-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/4051510.5380/rinc.v1i3.40515Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 1, n. 3 (2014): setembro/dezembro; 59-90Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 1, n. 3 (2014): setembro/dezembro; 59-90Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 1, n. 3 (2014): setembro/dezembro; 59-902359-563910.5380/rinc.v1i3reponame:Revista de Investigações Constitucionaisinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/40515/26565Direitos autorais 2016 Vanice Regina Lírio do Vallehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-07-25T23:55:24Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/40515Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rincPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/oairevista@ninc.com.br||2359-56392359-5639opendoar:2017-07-25T23:55:24Revista de Investigações Constitucionais - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dialogical constitutionalism manifestations in the Brazilian judicial review |
title |
Dialogical constitutionalism manifestations in the Brazilian judicial review |
spellingShingle |
Dialogical constitutionalism manifestations in the Brazilian judicial review Valle, Vanice Regina Lírio do Direito; Direito Constitucional |
title_short |
Dialogical constitutionalism manifestations in the Brazilian judicial review |
title_full |
Dialogical constitutionalism manifestations in the Brazilian judicial review |
title_fullStr |
Dialogical constitutionalism manifestations in the Brazilian judicial review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dialogical constitutionalism manifestations in the Brazilian judicial review |
title_sort |
Dialogical constitutionalism manifestations in the Brazilian judicial review |
author |
Valle, Vanice Regina Lírio do |
author_facet |
Valle, Vanice Regina Lírio do |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Valle, Vanice Regina Lírio do |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito; Direito Constitucional |
topic |
Direito; Direito Constitucional |
description |
The exponential growth in judicial review in Brazil, compared with the international scenery, is not out of tune – and it has a direct relation with many Brazilian constitutional features. An analytical text (with over 400 articles) and a large spectrum of fundamental rights, provide an ambience that favors highly intense controversy about State obligations in providing goods and public services, or even about the possible tensions that may arise between those same rights. The Brazilian Supreme Court faces that unmanageable number of lawsuits, notably related with claims regarding the non-granting of socioeconomic rights. That scenery is leading the Brazilian Supreme Court to some kind of experimentalism in the designing of its own rulings, applying techniques that can be easily associated with many manifestations of the so-called dialogical constitutionalism. All those experiences reveal that granting socioeconomic rights as a distributive justice goal requires a dialogic strategy in judicial review, in order to provide progressive implementation, preventing inequality. Still, those dialogic provisions face serious obstacles related with the menace of a merely symbolic use by the Judiciary and with a path of substitutive deliberation again by the Judiciary leading to reinforce Legislative inertia, social alienation from the debate and undermining democratic accountability. Adopting a dialogical constitutionalism model in Brazil might be a proper solution to allow its system to reach the functional development of the constitution’s goals – but it requires a deeper theoretical reflection. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-12-31 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/40515 10.5380/rinc.v1i3.40515 |
url |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/40515 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5380/rinc.v1i3.40515 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/40515/26565 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Vanice Regina Lírio do Valle http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Vanice Regina Lírio do Valle http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPR |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPR |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 1, n. 3 (2014): setembro/dezembro; 59-90 Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 1, n. 3 (2014): setembro/dezembro; 59-90 Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 1, n. 3 (2014): setembro/dezembro; 59-90 2359-5639 10.5380/rinc.v1i3 reponame:Revista de Investigações Constitucionais instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais |
collection |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ninc.com.br|| |
_version_ |
1797174657604911104 |