Concentrated judicial review in Brazil and Colombia: which (or whose) rights are protected?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Investigações Constitucionais |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/69583 |
Resumo: | Over the last few decades, judicial power has expanded, especially in constitutional or supreme courts. Recently, scholars in comparative constitutional law have focused their attention on analyzing the causes and consequences of this expansion in different constitutional systems. There are still no studies that compare the role played by constitutional or supreme courts in the defense of individual and social rights, specifically with regard to the link between the protection of rights and the extent to which social actors are granted standing to assert constitutional claims. This paper intends to provide some thoughts on this issue. The text will analyze the relationship between the protection of rights and the extent to which plaintiffs are granted the right to file constitutional claims in Colombia and Brazil. We conclude that the comparison between Brazil and Colombia presents relevant insights into how the dimension of authority, specifically standing to access the main courts in each system, can make a large difference in the protection of social and individual rights. |
id |
UFPR-14_9b902d9ae30fb9de18f32c22df2b0025 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/69583 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-14 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Concentrated judicial review in Brazil and Colombia: which (or whose) rights are protected?Direito Constitucional Comparadoprotection of individual and social rights; Colombian Constitutional Court; Brazilian Federal Supreme Court; criteria of autonomy and authority; criteria for standing to access the courts.Over the last few decades, judicial power has expanded, especially in constitutional or supreme courts. Recently, scholars in comparative constitutional law have focused their attention on analyzing the causes and consequences of this expansion in different constitutional systems. There are still no studies that compare the role played by constitutional or supreme courts in the defense of individual and social rights, specifically with regard to the link between the protection of rights and the extent to which social actors are granted standing to assert constitutional claims. This paper intends to provide some thoughts on this issue. The text will analyze the relationship between the protection of rights and the extent to which plaintiffs are granted the right to file constitutional claims in Colombia and Brazil. We conclude that the comparison between Brazil and Colombia presents relevant insights into how the dimension of authority, specifically standing to access the main courts in each system, can make a large difference in the protection of social and individual rights.NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPRCaldeira, Marcus Flávio Horta2020-10-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/6958310.5380/rinc.v7i1.69583Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 7, n. 1 (2020): janeiro/abril; 161-187Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 7, n. 1 (2020): janeiro/abril; 161-187Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 7, n. 1 (2020): janeiro/abril; 161-1872359-563910.5380/rinc.v7i1reponame:Revista de Investigações Constitucionaisinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/69583/41958Direitos autorais 2020 Marcus Flávio Horta Caldeirahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-09-13T13:19:02Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/69583Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rincPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/oairevista@ninc.com.br||2359-56392359-5639opendoar:2021-09-13T13:19:02Revista de Investigações Constitucionais - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Concentrated judicial review in Brazil and Colombia: which (or whose) rights are protected? |
title |
Concentrated judicial review in Brazil and Colombia: which (or whose) rights are protected? |
spellingShingle |
Concentrated judicial review in Brazil and Colombia: which (or whose) rights are protected? Caldeira, Marcus Flávio Horta Direito Constitucional Comparado protection of individual and social rights; Colombian Constitutional Court; Brazilian Federal Supreme Court; criteria of autonomy and authority; criteria for standing to access the courts. |
title_short |
Concentrated judicial review in Brazil and Colombia: which (or whose) rights are protected? |
title_full |
Concentrated judicial review in Brazil and Colombia: which (or whose) rights are protected? |
title_fullStr |
Concentrated judicial review in Brazil and Colombia: which (or whose) rights are protected? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Concentrated judicial review in Brazil and Colombia: which (or whose) rights are protected? |
title_sort |
Concentrated judicial review in Brazil and Colombia: which (or whose) rights are protected? |
author |
Caldeira, Marcus Flávio Horta |
author_facet |
Caldeira, Marcus Flávio Horta |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Caldeira, Marcus Flávio Horta |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito Constitucional Comparado protection of individual and social rights; Colombian Constitutional Court; Brazilian Federal Supreme Court; criteria of autonomy and authority; criteria for standing to access the courts. |
topic |
Direito Constitucional Comparado protection of individual and social rights; Colombian Constitutional Court; Brazilian Federal Supreme Court; criteria of autonomy and authority; criteria for standing to access the courts. |
description |
Over the last few decades, judicial power has expanded, especially in constitutional or supreme courts. Recently, scholars in comparative constitutional law have focused their attention on analyzing the causes and consequences of this expansion in different constitutional systems. There are still no studies that compare the role played by constitutional or supreme courts in the defense of individual and social rights, specifically with regard to the link between the protection of rights and the extent to which social actors are granted standing to assert constitutional claims. This paper intends to provide some thoughts on this issue. The text will analyze the relationship between the protection of rights and the extent to which plaintiffs are granted the right to file constitutional claims in Colombia and Brazil. We conclude that the comparison between Brazil and Colombia presents relevant insights into how the dimension of authority, specifically standing to access the main courts in each system, can make a large difference in the protection of social and individual rights. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-18 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/69583 10.5380/rinc.v7i1.69583 |
url |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/69583 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5380/rinc.v7i1.69583 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/69583/41958 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2020 Marcus Flávio Horta Caldeira http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2020 Marcus Flávio Horta Caldeira http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPR |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPR |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 7, n. 1 (2020): janeiro/abril; 161-187 Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 7, n. 1 (2020): janeiro/abril; 161-187 Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 7, n. 1 (2020): janeiro/abril; 161-187 2359-5639 10.5380/rinc.v7i1 reponame:Revista de Investigações Constitucionais instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais |
collection |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ninc.com.br|| |
_version_ |
1797174658452160512 |