Dialogues between Courts: the Unconstitutional State of Affairs in Colombia and Brazil (ADPF 347/DF)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Flavia Danielle Santiago
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Clementino, Gabriella Caldas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/35766
Resumo: How can courts respond to the omissions by majority powers in the formulation and implementation of public policy? Based on this question, this paper addresses the State of Unconstitutional Affairs, an institute developed in Colombia and incorporated by the Federal Supreme Court in ADPF nº347/DF, based on the many dialogues between South American courts. This research adopts the inductive method, in the analysis of the many decisions rendered by Colombian and Brazilian courts, in order to expose the incidental assumptions and limits imposed on the application of jurisprudential construction. This study, therefore, discusses the feasibility of judicial activism legitimized by the protection of fundamental rights, in light of the principle of the separation of powers, by the courts responsible for judicial review.
id UEL-2_8b84977d849bf8843015aab587cadfea
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35766
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling Dialogues between Courts: the Unconstitutional State of Affairs in Colombia and Brazil (ADPF 347/DF)Diálogos entre Cortes: o Estado de Coisas Inconstitucional na Colômbia e no Brasil (ADPF 347/DF)Unconstitutional State Of Affairs. Dialogues between courts. Constitutional Court of Colombia. Brazilian Supreme Court. ADPF nº 347/DFEstado de Coisas Inconstitucional. Diálogos entre cortes. Corte Constitucional da Colômbia. Supremo Tribunal Federal. ADPF nº 347/DF.How can courts respond to the omissions by majority powers in the formulation and implementation of public policy? Based on this question, this paper addresses the State of Unconstitutional Affairs, an institute developed in Colombia and incorporated by the Federal Supreme Court in ADPF nº347/DF, based on the many dialogues between South American courts. This research adopts the inductive method, in the analysis of the many decisions rendered by Colombian and Brazilian courts, in order to expose the incidental assumptions and limits imposed on the application of jurisprudential construction. This study, therefore, discusses the feasibility of judicial activism legitimized by the protection of fundamental rights, in light of the principle of the separation of powers, by the courts responsible for judicial review.Como os tribunais podem responder às omissões dos poderes majoritários na formulação e execução de políticas públicas? Partindo desta pergunta de pesquisa, o artigo aborda o Estado de Coisas Inconstitucional, instituto desenvolvido na Colômbia e incorporado pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal na ADPF nº347/DF, amparado em considerações quanto ao diálogo entre cortes sul-americanas. A pesquisa adota o método indutivo, na análise das decisões proferidas pelos tribunais colombiano e brasileiro, para exposição dos pressupostos de incidência e limites impostos à aplicação da construção jurisprudencial. Discute-se, assim, a viabilidade de ativismo judicial legitimado pela proteção dos direitos fundamentais, à luz do princípio da separação dos poderes, pelos tribunais encarregados pela revisão judicial.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2020-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/3576610.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n1p153Revista do Direito Público; v. 15 n. 1 (2020); 153-1731980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/35766/27274Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Públicohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Flavia Danielle SantiagoClementino, Gabriella Caldas2022-09-23T16:30:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35766Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2022-09-23T16:30:47Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dialogues between Courts: the Unconstitutional State of Affairs in Colombia and Brazil (ADPF 347/DF)
Diálogos entre Cortes: o Estado de Coisas Inconstitucional na Colômbia e no Brasil (ADPF 347/DF)
title Dialogues between Courts: the Unconstitutional State of Affairs in Colombia and Brazil (ADPF 347/DF)
spellingShingle Dialogues between Courts: the Unconstitutional State of Affairs in Colombia and Brazil (ADPF 347/DF)
Lima, Flavia Danielle Santiago
Unconstitutional State Of Affairs. Dialogues between courts. Constitutional Court of Colombia. Brazilian Supreme Court. ADPF nº 347/DF
Estado de Coisas Inconstitucional. Diálogos entre cortes. Corte Constitucional da Colômbia. Supremo Tribunal Federal. ADPF nº 347/DF.
title_short Dialogues between Courts: the Unconstitutional State of Affairs in Colombia and Brazil (ADPF 347/DF)
title_full Dialogues between Courts: the Unconstitutional State of Affairs in Colombia and Brazil (ADPF 347/DF)
title_fullStr Dialogues between Courts: the Unconstitutional State of Affairs in Colombia and Brazil (ADPF 347/DF)
title_full_unstemmed Dialogues between Courts: the Unconstitutional State of Affairs in Colombia and Brazil (ADPF 347/DF)
title_sort Dialogues between Courts: the Unconstitutional State of Affairs in Colombia and Brazil (ADPF 347/DF)
author Lima, Flavia Danielle Santiago
author_facet Lima, Flavia Danielle Santiago
Clementino, Gabriella Caldas
author_role author
author2 Clementino, Gabriella Caldas
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Flavia Danielle Santiago
Clementino, Gabriella Caldas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Unconstitutional State Of Affairs. Dialogues between courts. Constitutional Court of Colombia. Brazilian Supreme Court. ADPF nº 347/DF
Estado de Coisas Inconstitucional. Diálogos entre cortes. Corte Constitucional da Colômbia. Supremo Tribunal Federal. ADPF nº 347/DF.
topic Unconstitutional State Of Affairs. Dialogues between courts. Constitutional Court of Colombia. Brazilian Supreme Court. ADPF nº 347/DF
Estado de Coisas Inconstitucional. Diálogos entre cortes. Corte Constitucional da Colômbia. Supremo Tribunal Federal. ADPF nº 347/DF.
description How can courts respond to the omissions by majority powers in the formulation and implementation of public policy? Based on this question, this paper addresses the State of Unconstitutional Affairs, an institute developed in Colombia and incorporated by the Federal Supreme Court in ADPF nº347/DF, based on the many dialogues between South American courts. This research adopts the inductive method, in the analysis of the many decisions rendered by Colombian and Brazilian courts, in order to expose the incidental assumptions and limits imposed on the application of jurisprudential construction. This study, therefore, discusses the feasibility of judicial activism legitimized by the protection of fundamental rights, in light of the principle of the separation of powers, by the courts responsible for judicial review.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/35766
10.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n1p153
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/35766
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n1p153
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/35766/27274
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Público
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Público
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 15 n. 1 (2020); 153-173
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305932951257088

Registros relacionados