A DISCRICIONARIEDADE JUDICIAL NA METODOLOGIA CIVIL-CONSTITUCIONAL

• Autor(a) principal: Terra, Aline de Miranda Valverde
• Data de Publicação: 2015
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)
• Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/41141
• topic: Direito Civil; Arbitrariedade. Discricionariedade judicial. Metodologia civil-constitucional.; Arbitrariness. Judicial discretion. Civil-constitutional methodology.

This article aims to sharply and critically analyze the judicial discretion based on the civil-constitutional methodology. To this end, it will be demonstrated that the judicial discretion is inherent to any application and interpretation process of law, and more or less extensive, depending on the greater or lesser vagueness of the legislative technique applicable to the hypothesis to be examined. It will be seen that the judicial discretion, however, should not degenerate into arbitrariness, which results in causeless or teratological decisions. The legitimate exercise of discretion requires (i) the rational assessment of the facts by the magistrate and (ii) respect to the principle of legality. Regarding the control instrument, it should be emphasized the constitutional requirement to the grounds of the decision, important for both endo-processual and extra-processual control.