The "Be" man's anguished face as the ability to share subjective

• Autor(a) principal: e Silva, Marcos da Silva
• Data de Publicação: 2010
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Contradictio
• Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/contradictio/article/view/18162
• topic: Angústia, Ser, Existenz, Realidade

The Reality phenomenological and understanding "Being" as a possibility The reality of the phenomenon occurs when going to meet with another reality, reality may be perceived as sympathetic phenomenon, depending on the way, and as questions reality itself. Just what we believe is possible to understand, then, the phenomenon just the actual extent that understand. If we do not have knowledge of an object, how could we understand them? The problem is we put a lot of awareness on objects, thereby losing the notion of being objective reality, when what can be offered is to understand the reality through the eyes of reality itself, because the reality changes, plus the concept of reality not. This makes us realize that the reality is much more than herself, and that the fence, not this separate, as the infinite combination of real and agree to a genius, given the exalted romanticism. For the romantic, the reality is a whole of what is needed closer, not analytically, but in order to understand him to drive. Thus, we created chances of realities, in which the phenomenon is given by itself, and may be conceivable that all reality, and reality of human beings are a lot of confusion, which do not understand is that while a possibility, as Kierkegaard talks: I say therefore that there is anything that has by nature the opportunity to do something any action or suffer a [...]. And that's why we put this definition: The beings are nothing more than possibilities. (LE BLANC, 1998, apud Kierkegaard, 1813: Sofista 247e). Thus, in front of the world there are always possibilities of a confrontation with the multiplicity. In fact the multitude the man away from what it is more inherent, the condition of being the man is not merely epistemic, but more to understand what this front as its choice. "From 1800, the" being "is not simply a problem of thinking, going to be a problem for the philosophy of the Indian existenz as Hannah Arendt (1906: 15)" The term "eXistenZ" indicates, firstly, nothing more than be the man, regardless of all the qualities and abilities that can be investigated. "(ARENDT, 1906: 15). The world of "being" is now the world of "endless possibilities". The potential is the metaphysical condition of the existence of which is, as stated in Hannah Arendt (1906: 19) "man enough to realize that he is dependent - not for anything in particular, nor any limitation in general but of the fact that it is. "(ARENDT, 1906 19). Be a pure assumption that it is impossible to know. The "being" is always an empty space that consists of possibility that it could be, when completed by another. What does "be" be understood in its ontological sense is the very "being": what does is the echo of the possibility, awareness of the being-there, we are moving forward in time, because the possibilities of "being" often are in one, as it is timeless, a combination of time and action to "incorporate".