The structure of scientific revolution: a brief explanation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1336 |
Resumo: | How is scientific progress effected? Are there criteria for choosing scientific theories? What is the impact of cognitive and extra-cognitive values on scientific communities? To address issues like these, science philosopher Thomas Kuhn develops a structuralist perspective with a historical basis. We present the structure of scientific revolutions proposed by this thinker. Initially, we deal with the notion of paradigm, a key concept in its explanation of the functioning of science and scientific progress. Then we present the phases through which an area of research commonly goes through its trajectory: pre-science, normal science, crisis and revolution. We conclude the paper by drawing some parallels of this thinker's position with other epistemological perspectives of the last century. |
id |
UFRB-4_7e132861e3940f431324bb0eed7161ea |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/1336 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The structure of scientific revolution: a brief explanationA estrutura das revoluções científicas de Kuhn: uma breve exposiçãoParadigma; Progresso científico; Revolução científica; Ciência Normal.Paradigm; Scientific progress; Scientific revolution; Normal science.How is scientific progress effected? Are there criteria for choosing scientific theories? What is the impact of cognitive and extra-cognitive values on scientific communities? To address issues like these, science philosopher Thomas Kuhn develops a structuralist perspective with a historical basis. We present the structure of scientific revolutions proposed by this thinker. Initially, we deal with the notion of paradigm, a key concept in its explanation of the functioning of science and scientific progress. Then we present the phases through which an area of research commonly goes through its trajectory: pre-science, normal science, crisis and revolution. We conclude the paper by drawing some parallels of this thinker's position with other epistemological perspectives of the last century.Como ocorre o progresso científico? Existem critérios para a escolha de teorias científicas? Qual o impacto de valores cognitivos e extra-cognitivos sobre as comunidades científicas? Para tratar de questões como estas, o filósofo da ciência Thomas Kuhn adota uma perspectiva estruturalista com embasamento histórico. Apresentamos a estrutura das revoluções científicas proposta por este pensador. Tratamos, inicialmente, da noção de paradigma, conceito chave da sua explicação do funcionamento da ciência e do progresso científico. Em seguida, expomos as fases pelas quais uma área de pesquisa comumente passa ao longo de sua trajetória: pré-ciência, ciência normal, crise e revolução. Finalizamos o artigo traçando alguns paralelos da posição deste pensador com outras perspectivas epistemológicas do século passado.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2020-02-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/133610.31977/grirfi.v20i1.1336Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 1 (2020); 173-1922178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1336/976Copyright (c) 2020 Marcos Antonio Alves, Alan Rafael Valenteinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Marcos AntonioValente, Alan Rafael2020-06-30T18:13:21Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/1336Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:13:21Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The structure of scientific revolution: a brief explanation A estrutura das revoluções científicas de Kuhn: uma breve exposição |
title |
The structure of scientific revolution: a brief explanation |
spellingShingle |
The structure of scientific revolution: a brief explanation Alves, Marcos Antonio Paradigma; Progresso científico; Revolução científica; Ciência Normal. Paradigm; Scientific progress; Scientific revolution; Normal science. |
title_short |
The structure of scientific revolution: a brief explanation |
title_full |
The structure of scientific revolution: a brief explanation |
title_fullStr |
The structure of scientific revolution: a brief explanation |
title_full_unstemmed |
The structure of scientific revolution: a brief explanation |
title_sort |
The structure of scientific revolution: a brief explanation |
author |
Alves, Marcos Antonio |
author_facet |
Alves, Marcos Antonio Valente, Alan Rafael |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Valente, Alan Rafael |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alves, Marcos Antonio Valente, Alan Rafael |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Paradigma; Progresso científico; Revolução científica; Ciência Normal. Paradigm; Scientific progress; Scientific revolution; Normal science. |
topic |
Paradigma; Progresso científico; Revolução científica; Ciência Normal. Paradigm; Scientific progress; Scientific revolution; Normal science. |
description |
How is scientific progress effected? Are there criteria for choosing scientific theories? What is the impact of cognitive and extra-cognitive values on scientific communities? To address issues like these, science philosopher Thomas Kuhn develops a structuralist perspective with a historical basis. We present the structure of scientific revolutions proposed by this thinker. Initially, we deal with the notion of paradigm, a key concept in its explanation of the functioning of science and scientific progress. Then we present the phases through which an area of research commonly goes through its trajectory: pre-science, normal science, crisis and revolution. We conclude the paper by drawing some parallels of this thinker's position with other epistemological perspectives of the last century. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1336 10.31977/grirfi.v20i1.1336 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1336 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v20i1.1336 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1336/976 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Marcos Antonio Alves, Alan Rafael Valente info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Marcos Antonio Alves, Alan Rafael Valente |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 1 (2020); 173-192 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732699927445504 |