“Aiming to repel unjust aggression”: a sociology of police accounts and investigations into police lethality cases in Minas Gerais
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Sociologias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/sociologias/article/view/118639 |
Resumo: | Between 2012 and 2021, 1,146 people died because of police interventions in Minas Gerais. In almost all these cases, the official narrative of police reports was that these deaths occurred in situations of “confrontation”, in which police officers, acting in “strict compliance with legal duty”, used “moderate force” to “repel unjust aggression”. Literature in Brazil demonstrates that the mobilization of this grammar since the initial records is the first stage of a chain of procedures that, will eventually, almost always, result in the legal application of the “exclusion of illegality” to police lethality. Dialoguing with this production, this article presents the main results of a case study on inquiries into military police lethality in Minas Gerais. Adopting an ethnomethodological approach, we sought to understand how a complex system of representations, discourses and cognitions shared among police officers supports the construction of accounts on lethality cases, giving them the legal form of “legitimate self-defense”. In methodological terms, the study uses the analysis of 3,605 B.O. on deaths and injuries resulting from police interventions, registered in the state between 2013 and 2018, as well as 25 interviews with key-actors from the police forces and the Public Prosecutor’s Office. The research reveals that, in the discursive field, the Military Police of Minas Gerais has adopted institutional strategies to standardize the narratives of lethality records (official reports and military police investigations), activating, already in these documents, the grammar necessary for justifying the exclusion of illegality at the judicial stage. In procedural terms, the corporation has not only undertaken the investigations on its own lethality cases, but also interdicted attempts of external investigations made by the Civil Police. In the political/institutional sphere, the Military Police has systematically ignored determinations of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, fraying possibilities of external control of its activity. |
id |
UFRGS-10_6b4e95b5deffa59345ffc04409e0faf6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/118639 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-10 |
network_name_str |
Sociologias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
“Aiming to repel unjust aggression”: a sociology of police accounts and investigations into police lethality cases in Minas Gerais“Aspirando a repeler injusta agresión”: una sociología de los accounts policiales e las investigaciones de casos de letalidad policial en Minas Gerais“Visando repelir injusta agressão”: uma sociologia dos accounts policiais e das investigações dos casos de letalidade policial em Minas Geraisorganizações policiaisletalidade policialcontrole externo da atividade policialviolência policialinvestigaçãopolice organizationspolice lethalityexternal control of police activitypolice violenceinvestigationorganizaciones policialesletalidad policialcontrol externo de la actividad policial violencia policialinvestigaciónBetween 2012 and 2021, 1,146 people died because of police interventions in Minas Gerais. In almost all these cases, the official narrative of police reports was that these deaths occurred in situations of “confrontation”, in which police officers, acting in “strict compliance with legal duty”, used “moderate force” to “repel unjust aggression”. Literature in Brazil demonstrates that the mobilization of this grammar since the initial records is the first stage of a chain of procedures that, will eventually, almost always, result in the legal application of the “exclusion of illegality” to police lethality. Dialoguing with this production, this article presents the main results of a case study on inquiries into military police lethality in Minas Gerais. Adopting an ethnomethodological approach, we sought to understand how a complex system of representations, discourses and cognitions shared among police officers supports the construction of accounts on lethality cases, giving them the legal form of “legitimate self-defense”. In methodological terms, the study uses the analysis of 3,605 B.O. on deaths and injuries resulting from police interventions, registered in the state between 2013 and 2018, as well as 25 interviews with key-actors from the police forces and the Public Prosecutor’s Office. The research reveals that, in the discursive field, the Military Police of Minas Gerais has adopted institutional strategies to standardize the narratives of lethality records (official reports and military police investigations), activating, already in these documents, the grammar necessary for justifying the exclusion of illegality at the judicial stage. In procedural terms, the corporation has not only undertaken the investigations on its own lethality cases, but also interdicted attempts of external investigations made by the Civil Police. In the political/institutional sphere, the Military Police has systematically ignored determinations of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, fraying possibilities of external control of its activity.Entre 2012 y 2021, 1.146 personas murieron como resultado de intervenciones policiales en el estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil. En casi todos estos casos, la narrativa oficial de los informes policiales (B.O. -boletins de ocorrência) fue que estas muertes ocurrieron en situaciones de “enfrentamiento”, en las que los policías, actuando en “estricto cumplimiento del deber legal”, utilizaron “moderadamente los medios de fuerza necesarios”. para “repeler la injusta agresión”. Hay en Brasil abundante literatura que demuestra que la movilización de esta gramática, desde los registros iniciales, es la primera etapa de una cadena de procedimientos que, al final, casi siempre resultará en la aplicación jurídica de la “exclusión de ilicitud” a la letalidad policial. En diálogo con esa literatura, este artículo presenta los principales resultados de un estudio de caso sobre el procesamiento investigativo de la letalidad policial militar en Minas Gerais. Utilizando un abordaje etnometodológico se buscó comprender cómo un complejo sistema de representaciones, discursos y cogniciones compartidas entre policías sustenta la construcción de narrativas que califican jurídicamente los casos de letalidad policial como “legítima defensa”. En términos metodológicos, el estudio se basó en el análisis de 3.605 B.O. sobre muertos y heridos resultantes de intervenciones policiales registradas en el estado desde 2013 hasta 2018, además de 25 entrevistas a actores clave de las fuerzas policiales y del Ministerio Público. La investigación revela que, en el campo discursivo, la Policía Militar de Minas Gerais ha adoptado estrategias institucionales para estandarizar las narrativas insertadas en los registros de letalidad (reportes de hechos e investigaciones policiales militares), los cuales ya movilizan la gramática necesaria para la justificación de la “exclusión de ilicitud” en la etapa judicial. En términos procesales, la corporación no solo ha emprendido la investigación de sus propios casos de letalidad, sino que también ha obstruido intentos de investigaciones externas realizadas por la Policía Civil. En el ámbito político/institucional, la Policía Militar ha ignorado sistemáticamente las determinaciones del Ministerio Público, erosionando las posibilidades de control externo de su actividad. Entre 2012 e 2021, 1.146 pessoas morreram em decorrência de intervenções policiais em Minas Gerais. Em quase todos esses casos, a narrativa oficial dos boletins de ocorrência foi de que essas mortes se deram em situações de “confronto”, nas quais os policiais, atuado no “estrito cumprimento do dever legal”, usaram “moderadamente dos meios de força necessários” para “repelir injusta agressão”. Já há no Brasil farta literatura demonstrando que a mobilização dessa gramática, já nos registros iniciais, é a primeira etapa de uma cadeia de procedimentos que, ao final, quase sempre resultará na aplicação jurídica da “excludente de ilicitude” à letalidade policial. Dialogando com essa produção, este artigo apresenta os principais resultados de um estudo de caso sobre o processamento investigativo da letalidade policial militar em Minas Gerais. A partir de abordagem etnometodológica, buscou-se compreender como um complexo sistema de representações, discursos e cognições compartilhadas entre policiais sustenta a construção de accounts sobre os casos de letalidade, dando a eles a forma jurídica da “legítima defesa”. Em termos metodológicos, o estudo se vale da análise de 3.605 B.O. sobre mortes e ferimentos decorrentes de intervenções policiais registradas no estado entre 2013 e 2018, bem como de 25 entrevistas com atores-chave das forças policiais e do Ministério Público. A pesquisa revela que, no campo discursivo, a Polícia Militar de Minas Gerais tem adotado estratégias institucionais para padronizar as narrativas inseridas nos registros de letalidade (boletins de ocorrência e inquéritos policiais militares), já acionando, nesses documentos, a gramática necessária à fundamentação da excludente de ilicitude na etapa judicial. Em termos procedimentais, a corporação tem não apenas assumido a investigação de seus próprios casos letalidade, mas também interditado tentativas de apurações externas feitas pela Polícia Civil. Já na esfera política/institucional, a Polícia Militar tem sistematicamente ignorado determinações do Ministério Público, esgarçando possibilidades de controle externo de sua atividade. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2023-05-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/sociologias/article/view/11863910.1590/18070337-118639SOCIOLOGIAS; Vol. 25 (2023): Volume únicoSOCIOLOGIAS; Vol. 25 (2023): Volume únicoSociologias; v. 25 (2023): Volume único1807-03371517-4522reponame:Sociologias (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/sociologias/article/view/118639/88413Copyright (c) 2023 Luís Felipe Zilli, Amanda Matar de Figueiredo, Karina Rabelo Leite, Marcus Vinícius Gonçalves da Cruzhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZilli, Luís Felipede Figueiredo, Amanda MatarGonçalves da Cruz, Marcus ViníciusLeite Marinho, Karina Rabelo2023-10-06T01:13:24Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/118639Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/sociologiasPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/sociologias/oai||revsoc@ufrgs.br1807-03371517-4522opendoar:2023-10-06T01:13:24Sociologias (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
“Aiming to repel unjust aggression”: a sociology of police accounts and investigations into police lethality cases in Minas Gerais “Aspirando a repeler injusta agresión”: una sociología de los accounts policiales e las investigaciones de casos de letalidad policial en Minas Gerais “Visando repelir injusta agressão”: uma sociologia dos accounts policiais e das investigações dos casos de letalidade policial em Minas Gerais |
title |
“Aiming to repel unjust aggression”: a sociology of police accounts and investigations into police lethality cases in Minas Gerais |
spellingShingle |
“Aiming to repel unjust aggression”: a sociology of police accounts and investigations into police lethality cases in Minas Gerais Zilli, Luís Felipe organizações policiais letalidade policial controle externo da atividade policial violência policial investigação police organizations police lethality external control of police activity police violence investigation organizaciones policiales letalidad policial control externo de la actividad policial violencia policial investigación |
title_short |
“Aiming to repel unjust aggression”: a sociology of police accounts and investigations into police lethality cases in Minas Gerais |
title_full |
“Aiming to repel unjust aggression”: a sociology of police accounts and investigations into police lethality cases in Minas Gerais |
title_fullStr |
“Aiming to repel unjust aggression”: a sociology of police accounts and investigations into police lethality cases in Minas Gerais |
title_full_unstemmed |
“Aiming to repel unjust aggression”: a sociology of police accounts and investigations into police lethality cases in Minas Gerais |
title_sort |
“Aiming to repel unjust aggression”: a sociology of police accounts and investigations into police lethality cases in Minas Gerais |
author |
Zilli, Luís Felipe |
author_facet |
Zilli, Luís Felipe de Figueiredo, Amanda Matar Gonçalves da Cruz, Marcus Vinícius Leite Marinho, Karina Rabelo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Figueiredo, Amanda Matar Gonçalves da Cruz, Marcus Vinícius Leite Marinho, Karina Rabelo |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zilli, Luís Felipe de Figueiredo, Amanda Matar Gonçalves da Cruz, Marcus Vinícius Leite Marinho, Karina Rabelo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
organizações policiais letalidade policial controle externo da atividade policial violência policial investigação police organizations police lethality external control of police activity police violence investigation organizaciones policiales letalidad policial control externo de la actividad policial violencia policial investigación |
topic |
organizações policiais letalidade policial controle externo da atividade policial violência policial investigação police organizations police lethality external control of police activity police violence investigation organizaciones policiales letalidad policial control externo de la actividad policial violencia policial investigación |
description |
Between 2012 and 2021, 1,146 people died because of police interventions in Minas Gerais. In almost all these cases, the official narrative of police reports was that these deaths occurred in situations of “confrontation”, in which police officers, acting in “strict compliance with legal duty”, used “moderate force” to “repel unjust aggression”. Literature in Brazil demonstrates that the mobilization of this grammar since the initial records is the first stage of a chain of procedures that, will eventually, almost always, result in the legal application of the “exclusion of illegality” to police lethality. Dialoguing with this production, this article presents the main results of a case study on inquiries into military police lethality in Minas Gerais. Adopting an ethnomethodological approach, we sought to understand how a complex system of representations, discourses and cognitions shared among police officers supports the construction of accounts on lethality cases, giving them the legal form of “legitimate self-defense”. In methodological terms, the study uses the analysis of 3,605 B.O. on deaths and injuries resulting from police interventions, registered in the state between 2013 and 2018, as well as 25 interviews with key-actors from the police forces and the Public Prosecutor’s Office. The research reveals that, in the discursive field, the Military Police of Minas Gerais has adopted institutional strategies to standardize the narratives of lethality records (official reports and military police investigations), activating, already in these documents, the grammar necessary for justifying the exclusion of illegality at the judicial stage. In procedural terms, the corporation has not only undertaken the investigations on its own lethality cases, but also interdicted attempts of external investigations made by the Civil Police. In the political/institutional sphere, the Military Police has systematically ignored determinations of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, fraying possibilities of external control of its activity. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/sociologias/article/view/118639 10.1590/18070337-118639 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/sociologias/article/view/118639 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/18070337-118639 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/sociologias/article/view/118639/88413 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SOCIOLOGIAS; Vol. 25 (2023): Volume único SOCIOLOGIAS; Vol. 25 (2023): Volume único Sociologias; v. 25 (2023): Volume único 1807-0337 1517-4522 reponame:Sociologias (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Sociologias (Online) |
collection |
Sociologias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sociologias (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revsoc@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1799766143140888576 |