Controversy over the juvenile justice model underpinning the Child and Adolescent Statute
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Sociologias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/sociologias/article/view/117917 |
Resumo: | In this article, we seek to analyze a concrete process: the struggles in the political and professional arena around the definition of juvenile justice in Brazil at the end of the 1980s. The approval of the Child and Adolescent Statute (Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente - ECA) in 1990 is often represented as a rupture with the previous model, provided for in the Code for Minors (Código de Menores) of 1927 and 1979. Generally, the ECA is framed as a “revolution”, a “paradigm shift” in relation to the previous model, that is, as an expression of a rupture with the previous moment. For this, we chose to recover this struggle, seeking to capture the ways of thinking or rationalities about juvenile justice, the social representations about youth and criminality and the actors involved in this process, especially from interviews and parliamentary speeches. With this, we conclude that the juvenile justice content in ECA is the result of disputes fought in the juridical field by those identified as “garantistas” and “menoristas” and, despite bringing innovations in the sense of imposing limitations on state intervention, it still presents continuities in relation to the previous model. |
id |
UFRGS-10_72092baf9a39459fc1a5ddd56e6d5419 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/117917 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-10 |
network_name_str |
Sociologias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Controversy over the juvenile justice model underpinning the Child and Adolescent StatuteAs disputas em torno da definição do modelo de justiça juvenil do Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente / Controversy over the juvenile justice model underpinning the Child and Adolescent Statutejuvenile justicepunishmentStatute of Child and Adolescentlegal reformscriminal policyjustiça juvenilpuniçãoEstatuto da Criança e do Adolescentereformas legislativaspolítica criminalIn this article, we seek to analyze a concrete process: the struggles in the political and professional arena around the definition of juvenile justice in Brazil at the end of the 1980s. The approval of the Child and Adolescent Statute (Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente - ECA) in 1990 is often represented as a rupture with the previous model, provided for in the Code for Minors (Código de Menores) of 1927 and 1979. Generally, the ECA is framed as a “revolution”, a “paradigm shift” in relation to the previous model, that is, as an expression of a rupture with the previous moment. For this, we chose to recover this struggle, seeking to capture the ways of thinking or rationalities about juvenile justice, the social representations about youth and criminality and the actors involved in this process, especially from interviews and parliamentary speeches. With this, we conclude that the juvenile justice content in ECA is the result of disputes fought in the juridical field by those identified as “garantistas” and “menoristas” and, despite bringing innovations in the sense of imposing limitations on state intervention, it still presents continuities in relation to the previous model.No presente artigo, busca-se analisar um processo concreto: as disputas travadas na arena política e profissional em torno da definição da justiça juvenil no Brasil ao final dos anos 1980. O questionamento que deu origem à pesquisa decorre do interesse em verificar se a aprovação do Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente (ECA), em 1990, constitui uma ruptura em relação ao modelo anterior, previsto nos Códigos de Menores de 1927 e 1979. Isso porque, geralmente, retrata-se o ECA como uma “revolução”, uma “mudança de paradigma” em relação ao modelo anterior, ou seja, como expressão de ruptura com o momento precedente. Para isso, optamos por recuperar essa disputa, buscando captar os modos de pensar ou racionalidades sobre a justiça juvenil, as representações sociais sobre jovens e criminalidade e os atores envolvidos nesse processo, especialmente a partir de entrevistas e discursos parlamentares. Com isso, concluímos que as disposições no ECA sobre justiça juvenil são resultado das disputas travadas no campo jurídico por aqueles identificados como “garantistas” e “menoristas” e que, apesar de trazerem inovações no sentido de impor limitações à intervenção estatal, ainda apresentam continuidades com relação ao modelo anterior. ==== In this article, we seek to analyze a concrete process: the struggles in the political and professional arena around the definition of juvenile justice in Brazil at the end of the 1980s. The approval of the Child and Adolescent Statute (Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente - ECA) in 1990 is often represented as a rupture with the previous model, provided for in the Code for Minors (Código de Menores) of 1927 and 1979. Generally, the ECA is framed as a “revolution”, a “paradigm shift” in relation to the previous model, that is, as an expression of a rupture with the previous moment. For this, we chose to recover this struggle, seeking to capture the ways of thinking or rationalities about juvenile justice, the social representations about youth and criminality and the actors involved in this process, especially from interviews and parliamentary speeches. With this, we conclude that the juvenile justice content in ECA is the result of disputes fought in the juridical field by those identified as “garantistas” and “menoristas” and, despite bringing innovations in the sense of imposing limitations on state intervention, it still presents continuities in relation to the previous model.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2021-12-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/sociologias/article/view/11791710.1590/15174522-117917SOCIOLOGIAS; Vol. 23 No. 58 (2021): Adolescents deemed as a problem: narrative disputes, production of law and punishment; 138-167SOCIOLOGIAS; Vol. 23 Núm. 58 (2021): O adolescente visto como problema: disputas narrativas, produção legislativa e punição; 138-167Sociologias; v. 23 n. 58 (2021): O adolescente visto como problema: disputas narrativas, produção legislativa e punição; 138-1671807-03371517-4522reponame:Sociologias (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/sociologias/article/view/117917/65489Copyright (c) 2021 Ana Claudia Cifaliinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCifali, Ana Claudia2021-12-12T18:26:45Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/117917Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/sociologiasPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/sociologias/oai||revsoc@ufrgs.br1807-03371517-4522opendoar:2021-12-12T18:26:45Sociologias (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Controversy over the juvenile justice model underpinning the Child and Adolescent Statute As disputas em torno da definição do modelo de justiça juvenil do Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente / Controversy over the juvenile justice model underpinning the Child and Adolescent Statute |
title |
Controversy over the juvenile justice model underpinning the Child and Adolescent Statute |
spellingShingle |
Controversy over the juvenile justice model underpinning the Child and Adolescent Statute Cifali, Ana Claudia juvenile justice punishment Statute of Child and Adolescent legal reforms criminal policy justiça juvenil punição Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente reformas legislativas política criminal |
title_short |
Controversy over the juvenile justice model underpinning the Child and Adolescent Statute |
title_full |
Controversy over the juvenile justice model underpinning the Child and Adolescent Statute |
title_fullStr |
Controversy over the juvenile justice model underpinning the Child and Adolescent Statute |
title_full_unstemmed |
Controversy over the juvenile justice model underpinning the Child and Adolescent Statute |
title_sort |
Controversy over the juvenile justice model underpinning the Child and Adolescent Statute |
author |
Cifali, Ana Claudia |
author_facet |
Cifali, Ana Claudia |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cifali, Ana Claudia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
juvenile justice punishment Statute of Child and Adolescent legal reforms criminal policy justiça juvenil punição Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente reformas legislativas política criminal |
topic |
juvenile justice punishment Statute of Child and Adolescent legal reforms criminal policy justiça juvenil punição Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente reformas legislativas política criminal |
description |
In this article, we seek to analyze a concrete process: the struggles in the political and professional arena around the definition of juvenile justice in Brazil at the end of the 1980s. The approval of the Child and Adolescent Statute (Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente - ECA) in 1990 is often represented as a rupture with the previous model, provided for in the Code for Minors (Código de Menores) of 1927 and 1979. Generally, the ECA is framed as a “revolution”, a “paradigm shift” in relation to the previous model, that is, as an expression of a rupture with the previous moment. For this, we chose to recover this struggle, seeking to capture the ways of thinking or rationalities about juvenile justice, the social representations about youth and criminality and the actors involved in this process, especially from interviews and parliamentary speeches. With this, we conclude that the juvenile justice content in ECA is the result of disputes fought in the juridical field by those identified as “garantistas” and “menoristas” and, despite bringing innovations in the sense of imposing limitations on state intervention, it still presents continuities in relation to the previous model. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/sociologias/article/view/117917 10.1590/15174522-117917 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/sociologias/article/view/117917 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/15174522-117917 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/sociologias/article/view/117917/65489 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Ana Claudia Cifali info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Ana Claudia Cifali |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SOCIOLOGIAS; Vol. 23 No. 58 (2021): Adolescents deemed as a problem: narrative disputes, production of law and punishment; 138-167 SOCIOLOGIAS; Vol. 23 Núm. 58 (2021): O adolescente visto como problema: disputas narrativas, produção legislativa e punição; 138-167 Sociologias; v. 23 n. 58 (2021): O adolescente visto como problema: disputas narrativas, produção legislativa e punição; 138-167 1807-0337 1517-4522 reponame:Sociologias (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Sociologias (Online) |
collection |
Sociologias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sociologias (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revsoc@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1799766143119917056 |