Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de-Paris, Fernanda
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Voigt, Francine, Machado, Alice Beatriz Mombach Pinheiro, Oliveira, Kátia Ruschel Pilger, Willers, Denise Maria Cunha, Mayora, Dirce Veloso, Paiva, Rodrigo Minuto, Barth, Afonso Luís
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinical and Biomedical Research
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/61295
Resumo: Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) persists as a severe global public health issue. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of an in-house TB PCR (polymerase chain reaction) in sputum.Methods: DNA from sputum specimens were submitted to a nested-PCR protocol for the IS6110 region detection. PCR results were compared to those of the traditional methods for TB diagnosis, i.e., acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy and culture. We analyzed sputum samples obtained from 133 patients.Results: A total of 48 (36%) cultures yielded indeterminate results due to contamination. This high contamination rate may be explained by the fact that samples from fibrocystic patients were included in this study. Additionally, other five samples were positive for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Therefore, it was possible to compare 80 patients for M. tuberculosis detection. We found 14 positive samples: five presented positive results in the three methods (5/14; 35.7%), two were positive in culture and PCR (2/14; 14.3%), one was positive in AFB and PCR (1/14; 7.1%), five were positive only in PCR (5/14; 35.7%) and 1 was positive only in culture (1/14; 7.1%). Thus, positivity rates for each technique were: 7.5% for AFB (6/80), 10% for culture (8/80) and 16.25% for PCR (13/80). Among the 48 patients who had indeterminate results in sputum culture, two samples were positive in PCR.Conclusion: Considering the limitations of the traditional methods, the use of PCR as a molecular technique could be advantageous for TB diagnosis. 
id UFRGS-20_ccd05f182860211b60194f65dfa092c6
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/61295
network_acronym_str UFRGS-20
network_name_str Clinical and Biomedical Research
repository_id_str
spelling Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospitalIntroduction: Tuberculosis (TB) persists as a severe global public health issue. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of an in-house TB PCR (polymerase chain reaction) in sputum.Methods: DNA from sputum specimens were submitted to a nested-PCR protocol for the IS6110 region detection. PCR results were compared to those of the traditional methods for TB diagnosis, i.e., acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy and culture. We analyzed sputum samples obtained from 133 patients.Results: A total of 48 (36%) cultures yielded indeterminate results due to contamination. This high contamination rate may be explained by the fact that samples from fibrocystic patients were included in this study. Additionally, other five samples were positive for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Therefore, it was possible to compare 80 patients for M. tuberculosis detection. We found 14 positive samples: five presented positive results in the three methods (5/14; 35.7%), two were positive in culture and PCR (2/14; 14.3%), one was positive in AFB and PCR (1/14; 7.1%), five were positive only in PCR (5/14; 35.7%) and 1 was positive only in culture (1/14; 7.1%). Thus, positivity rates for each technique were: 7.5% for AFB (6/80), 10% for culture (8/80) and 16.25% for PCR (13/80). Among the 48 patients who had indeterminate results in sputum culture, two samples were positive in PCR.Conclusion: Considering the limitations of the traditional methods, the use of PCR as a molecular technique could be advantageous for TB diagnosis. HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS2016-05-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/61295Clinical & Biomedical Research; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2016): Clinical and Biomedical ResearchClinical and Biomedical Research; v. 36 n. 1 (2016): Clinical and Biomedical Research2357-9730reponame:Clinical and Biomedical Researchinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSenghttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/61295/pdfde-Paris, FernandaVoigt, FrancineMachado, Alice Beatriz Mombach PinheiroOliveira, Kátia Ruschel PilgerWillers, Denise Maria CunhaMayora, Dirce VelosoPaiva, Rodrigo MinutoBarth, Afonso Luísinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-19T14:25:53Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/61295Revistahttps://www.seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpaPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/oai||cbr@hcpa.edu.br2357-97302357-9730opendoar:2024-01-19T14:25:53Clinical and Biomedical Research - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital
title Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital
spellingShingle Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital
de-Paris, Fernanda
title_short Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital
title_full Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital
title_fullStr Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital
title_sort Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital
author de-Paris, Fernanda
author_facet de-Paris, Fernanda
Voigt, Francine
Machado, Alice Beatriz Mombach Pinheiro
Oliveira, Kátia Ruschel Pilger
Willers, Denise Maria Cunha
Mayora, Dirce Veloso
Paiva, Rodrigo Minuto
Barth, Afonso Luís
author_role author
author2 Voigt, Francine
Machado, Alice Beatriz Mombach Pinheiro
Oliveira, Kátia Ruschel Pilger
Willers, Denise Maria Cunha
Mayora, Dirce Veloso
Paiva, Rodrigo Minuto
Barth, Afonso Luís
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de-Paris, Fernanda
Voigt, Francine
Machado, Alice Beatriz Mombach Pinheiro
Oliveira, Kátia Ruschel Pilger
Willers, Denise Maria Cunha
Mayora, Dirce Veloso
Paiva, Rodrigo Minuto
Barth, Afonso Luís
description Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) persists as a severe global public health issue. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of an in-house TB PCR (polymerase chain reaction) in sputum.Methods: DNA from sputum specimens were submitted to a nested-PCR protocol for the IS6110 region detection. PCR results were compared to those of the traditional methods for TB diagnosis, i.e., acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy and culture. We analyzed sputum samples obtained from 133 patients.Results: A total of 48 (36%) cultures yielded indeterminate results due to contamination. This high contamination rate may be explained by the fact that samples from fibrocystic patients were included in this study. Additionally, other five samples were positive for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Therefore, it was possible to compare 80 patients for M. tuberculosis detection. We found 14 positive samples: five presented positive results in the three methods (5/14; 35.7%), two were positive in culture and PCR (2/14; 14.3%), one was positive in AFB and PCR (1/14; 7.1%), five were positive only in PCR (5/14; 35.7%) and 1 was positive only in culture (1/14; 7.1%). Thus, positivity rates for each technique were: 7.5% for AFB (6/80), 10% for culture (8/80) and 16.25% for PCR (13/80). Among the 48 patients who had indeterminate results in sputum culture, two samples were positive in PCR.Conclusion: Considering the limitations of the traditional methods, the use of PCR as a molecular technique could be advantageous for TB diagnosis. 
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-05-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/61295
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/61295
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/61295/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinical & Biomedical Research; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2016): Clinical and Biomedical Research
Clinical and Biomedical Research; v. 36 n. 1 (2016): Clinical and Biomedical Research
2357-9730
reponame:Clinical and Biomedical Research
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Clinical and Biomedical Research
collection Clinical and Biomedical Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinical and Biomedical Research - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cbr@hcpa.edu.br
_version_ 1799767053788250112