Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinical and Biomedical Research |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/61295 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) persists as a severe global public health issue. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of an in-house TB PCR (polymerase chain reaction) in sputum.Methods: DNA from sputum specimens were submitted to a nested-PCR protocol for the IS6110 region detection. PCR results were compared to those of the traditional methods for TB diagnosis, i.e., acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy and culture. We analyzed sputum samples obtained from 133 patients.Results: A total of 48 (36%) cultures yielded indeterminate results due to contamination. This high contamination rate may be explained by the fact that samples from fibrocystic patients were included in this study. Additionally, other five samples were positive for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Therefore, it was possible to compare 80 patients for M. tuberculosis detection. We found 14 positive samples: five presented positive results in the three methods (5/14; 35.7%), two were positive in culture and PCR (2/14; 14.3%), one was positive in AFB and PCR (1/14; 7.1%), five were positive only in PCR (5/14; 35.7%) and 1 was positive only in culture (1/14; 7.1%). Thus, positivity rates for each technique were: 7.5% for AFB (6/80), 10% for culture (8/80) and 16.25% for PCR (13/80). Among the 48 patients who had indeterminate results in sputum culture, two samples were positive in PCR.Conclusion: Considering the limitations of the traditional methods, the use of PCR as a molecular technique could be advantageous for TB diagnosis. |
id |
UFRGS-20_ccd05f182860211b60194f65dfa092c6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/61295 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-20 |
network_name_str |
Clinical and Biomedical Research |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospitalIntroduction: Tuberculosis (TB) persists as a severe global public health issue. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of an in-house TB PCR (polymerase chain reaction) in sputum.Methods: DNA from sputum specimens were submitted to a nested-PCR protocol for the IS6110 region detection. PCR results were compared to those of the traditional methods for TB diagnosis, i.e., acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy and culture. We analyzed sputum samples obtained from 133 patients.Results: A total of 48 (36%) cultures yielded indeterminate results due to contamination. This high contamination rate may be explained by the fact that samples from fibrocystic patients were included in this study. Additionally, other five samples were positive for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Therefore, it was possible to compare 80 patients for M. tuberculosis detection. We found 14 positive samples: five presented positive results in the three methods (5/14; 35.7%), two were positive in culture and PCR (2/14; 14.3%), one was positive in AFB and PCR (1/14; 7.1%), five were positive only in PCR (5/14; 35.7%) and 1 was positive only in culture (1/14; 7.1%). Thus, positivity rates for each technique were: 7.5% for AFB (6/80), 10% for culture (8/80) and 16.25% for PCR (13/80). Among the 48 patients who had indeterminate results in sputum culture, two samples were positive in PCR.Conclusion: Considering the limitations of the traditional methods, the use of PCR as a molecular technique could be advantageous for TB diagnosis. HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS2016-05-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/61295Clinical & Biomedical Research; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2016): Clinical and Biomedical ResearchClinical and Biomedical Research; v. 36 n. 1 (2016): Clinical and Biomedical Research2357-9730reponame:Clinical and Biomedical Researchinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSenghttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/61295/pdfde-Paris, FernandaVoigt, FrancineMachado, Alice Beatriz Mombach PinheiroOliveira, Kátia Ruschel PilgerWillers, Denise Maria CunhaMayora, Dirce VelosoPaiva, Rodrigo MinutoBarth, Afonso Luísinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-19T14:25:53Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/61295Revistahttps://www.seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpaPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/oai||cbr@hcpa.edu.br2357-97302357-9730opendoar:2024-01-19T14:25:53Clinical and Biomedical Research - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital |
title |
Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital |
spellingShingle |
Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital de-Paris, Fernanda |
title_short |
Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital |
title_full |
Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital |
title_fullStr |
Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital |
title_full_unstemmed |
Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital |
title_sort |
Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: An experience at a tertiary hospital |
author |
de-Paris, Fernanda |
author_facet |
de-Paris, Fernanda Voigt, Francine Machado, Alice Beatriz Mombach Pinheiro Oliveira, Kátia Ruschel Pilger Willers, Denise Maria Cunha Mayora, Dirce Veloso Paiva, Rodrigo Minuto Barth, Afonso Luís |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Voigt, Francine Machado, Alice Beatriz Mombach Pinheiro Oliveira, Kátia Ruschel Pilger Willers, Denise Maria Cunha Mayora, Dirce Veloso Paiva, Rodrigo Minuto Barth, Afonso Luís |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de-Paris, Fernanda Voigt, Francine Machado, Alice Beatriz Mombach Pinheiro Oliveira, Kátia Ruschel Pilger Willers, Denise Maria Cunha Mayora, Dirce Veloso Paiva, Rodrigo Minuto Barth, Afonso Luís |
description |
Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) persists as a severe global public health issue. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of an in-house TB PCR (polymerase chain reaction) in sputum.Methods: DNA from sputum specimens were submitted to a nested-PCR protocol for the IS6110 region detection. PCR results were compared to those of the traditional methods for TB diagnosis, i.e., acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy and culture. We analyzed sputum samples obtained from 133 patients.Results: A total of 48 (36%) cultures yielded indeterminate results due to contamination. This high contamination rate may be explained by the fact that samples from fibrocystic patients were included in this study. Additionally, other five samples were positive for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Therefore, it was possible to compare 80 patients for M. tuberculosis detection. We found 14 positive samples: five presented positive results in the three methods (5/14; 35.7%), two were positive in culture and PCR (2/14; 14.3%), one was positive in AFB and PCR (1/14; 7.1%), five were positive only in PCR (5/14; 35.7%) and 1 was positive only in culture (1/14; 7.1%). Thus, positivity rates for each technique were: 7.5% for AFB (6/80), 10% for culture (8/80) and 16.25% for PCR (13/80). Among the 48 patients who had indeterminate results in sputum culture, two samples were positive in PCR.Conclusion: Considering the limitations of the traditional methods, the use of PCR as a molecular technique could be advantageous for TB diagnosis. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-05-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article Avaliado por Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/61295 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/61295 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/61295/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical & Biomedical Research; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2016): Clinical and Biomedical Research Clinical and Biomedical Research; v. 36 n. 1 (2016): Clinical and Biomedical Research 2357-9730 reponame:Clinical and Biomedical Research instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Clinical and Biomedical Research |
collection |
Clinical and Biomedical Research |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinical and Biomedical Research - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cbr@hcpa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1799767053788250112 |